WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH POPE PREVOST & THE PRESIDENT?

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.

Here's what is actually going on, guys 

US President Donald Trump is not the Trump we once knew. Under the spell of lunatic Zionist Paula White, he's been mean to 'Pope Leo XIV' and with mid-term polls looming, Republicans are fretting he'll lose the Catholic vote. American Catholics sitting on the fence need to realise that: 1) the millions of unborn babies who'd be condemned to death by a Democrat win belong to Almighty God; 2) Trump can no longer be counted on to defend them; and 3) Robert Prevost is a self-identified idolater and heretic. 

The Catholic Encyclopedia (1914, Vol. 7, p. 261) states: “The pope himself, if notoriously guilty of heresy, would cease to be pope because he would cease to be a member of the Church.” St Robert Bellarmine, Cardinal and Doctor of the Church, De Romano Pontifice, II, 30: "A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction."

Well, God has always preserved His Church from a heretical papacy. Fr Robert Prevost's (and Jorge Bergoglio's) public worship of a pagan god is further proof - if it were needed - that they were invalidly elected. Mean and ridiculous though Trump may be, he's not guilty of abusing the pontificate, or the Catholic Church, but an antipope.

Prevost was photographed with his Augustinian brother priests worshipping the Luciferian goddess Pachamama. That is, publicly breaking the First Commandment. 30-odd years ago. He has never denied it. Pachamama's devotees in South America pay her tribute by getting people passed-out drunk and buried alive as blood offerings to the demon. It's a big thing in Brazil. Pretty much like offering unborn children to the god of self-interest (Moloch) by the million, all around the world. 

Isn't that interesting? Both antipopes - Francis and Leo - publicly worshipped a pagan goddess who demands the sacrifice of live human beings. So one wonders why 'Pope Leo' is engaging in politics instead of saving souls. And why he appears to be veering to the left by inviting David Axelrod, top strategist for Barack Obama - who offered over 4.8 million infants to Moloch during his administration - to the Vatican. 

Not only did Prevost proceed, after the Axelrod meeting, to wade into the American president, but so did the three wokest, furthest-left American cardinals - Blase Cupich, Joseph Tobin and Robert McElroy - funnily enough, echoing Prevost's propaganda: not condemning abortion, but ICE and Iran. Coincidence, anyone?

No real Catholic will be influenced by these three false shepherds, compromised as they are by association with the sexual predator McCarrick. Just as no thinking Catholic would be upset by criticism of a 'pope' publicly exposed as an idolatrous heretic, and therefore disqualified from holding any office whatsoever in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, let alone occupancy of the See of Peter.

When the world willingly - and legally - sacrifices to the demon Moloch he gains more influence. In his hatred for humanity, Satan/Lucifer is at work on Trump through his proxies Paula White (assisted by Bishop Robert Barron), and Israel First Jews, to assuage his thirst for blood by war; and also influencing 'Pope Leo XIV',  avenging himself on Jesus Christ in the Blessed Eucharist. And if you join the dots, launching a fresh assault on His little ones, in the wombs of their mothers.

As Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre observed, “we will never understand the struggle between good and evil throughout history unless we see it as the personal and unyielding battle, for all time, between Satan and Jesus Christ.”

 

 

From the new, South African, uber-conservative, far-right RADICAL FIDELITY: 

	On Trump Inc., Having Nowhere to Lay Your Head, and The Only Banner to Die Under

 

It is perhaps long past time for Catholics to measure their loyalties against these divine standards.

 

Up to the moment I started writing down my thoughts (Thursday, April 16), you could not click on a Catholic or secular news outlet without being bombarded with something pertaining to the Trump vs. Leo XIV debacle, the Trump “Jesus” Truth Social post, or the consequential fallout.

Liberal Catholic outlets such as Where Peter Is, Religion Digital, and National Catholic Reporter were frothing at the mouth with delight, as this was, after all, a two-birds-with-one-stone moment.

 

Not only could they dump on any Catholic who does not worship Karl Marx, but they could also garner sympathy for Synodal Church leader Leo XIV and his program of ushering in the One World Religion.

 

Even Trad Inc. laid down their toy guns and pre-1955 missals for two seconds and, with great magnanimous nobility, swore allegiance to their “pope” with fresh fervor.

 

After all, you had to choose a side.

 

I started noticing, all over the place, that many of those who have consistently condemned the Trad Inc. camp for their hypocrisy were suddenly making themselves guilty of practising exactly the same vice. Right before our eyes, we saw the birth of a new beast among Traditional Catholics: Trump Inc.

 

Gosh, I will be the first to admit that, on a very superficial level, I—as someone uber-conservative and on the far-right of the political spectrum—was secretly excited when Trump got re-elected.

 

In the beginning, he was doing exciting things, seemed friendly with Christians in the broad sense, at least initially said he was pro-life, and was all about America as opposed to the Globalist agenda. His rhetoric was that of a nationalist who wanted to put America first and bring some much-needed sanity to international politics. And he was entertaining.

Unfortunately, something happened, and he made what seems like a 180-degree turn on many important issues. Suffice it to say that I cannot speak for Trump hardliners, but if I had voted for him, I would be very disappointed right now.

 

Who you voted for in the United States is ultimately your business. What is not a good look, though, is if you are a Traditional Catholic and are not condemning his quasi-messianic posturing, which has become blatantly blasphemous. What is even worse is if, instead of condemning his wrongdoings, you are defending him.

 

Not only does this seem like hypocrisy in the same league as that of Trad Inc., but more seriously, you are seemingly betraying Christ out of loyalty to a non-believing, arrogant, warmongering, foul-mouthed, money-worshiping puppet of “God’s chosen people.”

 

Those remarks are by no means an endorsement of the usurper Leo XIV and his diabolical crew of Christ-haters who masquerade as “the hierarchy.” You would have to be stupid or in a coma not to know that the Synodal “Pope’s” denunciations of Trump and Netanyahu’s filthy and unjust war have nothing to do with any Catholic convictions he holds, but everything to do with virtue signalling and promoting the goals and designs of the satanic globalist agenda.

 

Just because I am not for Trump and Netanyahu or find Trump’s “Jesus” post disgusting and highly disturbing, does not mean I am pro the Synodal heretic Church, its leaders, or its false, woke, Marxist religion.

Ultimately, as far apart as these two sides may seem, they are part of the same kingdom—that of Satan.

 

What's that about leopards and their spots ... 

 

I am on another side. I am Catholic. Therefore, my loyalty is to Christ the King, to His true Church, and to what His Church teaches and demands of me. For Him and the Catholic Church, I will die. Not for Trump, and not for the Synodal enemies of Christ.

 

Yet I see Catholics sucked into this false dichotomy all the time. Without fail, I have to explain that because I am anti-Zionism does not make me pro-Islam. And because I am against Zionism also does not mean I am pro-Palestine. Ultimately, I believe that the Holy Land belongs to Catholics. Both Judaism and Islam are false religions, and we should pray for these people’s conversion, and war against their advances on what is left of Christendom.

 

Heresy

 

Another example may be found in the political situation of my own country, and in the reason why I refuse to vote. The ruling party consists of a collection of atheistic, Rolex-wearing Marxists who are bleeding the nation dry while upholding a constitution that is praised as one of the most “progressive” in the world, that is to say, one of the most radically opposed to the Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

 

The opposition, for its part, offers no real alternative and is in many ways even more sinister and dangerous. The Democratic Alliance aspires to imitate its liberal counterparts in America and Canada; it is permeated with Masonic influence and sustained by Soros-funded organizations that clandestinely promotes antichrist ideology.

 

Between these two poles lies the remainder of the political “options”: from tepid conservative Calvinists to radical anarchists, each proposing its own vision of order or revolution. Yet nowhere within this entire spectrum is there a party that truly submits itself to the Social Reign of Christ the King and the Catholic Church’s teachings.

 

Nowhere is there a movement that does not, in some measure, enshrine error, compromise with evil, or subordinate divine law to human preference.

 

Why, then, should I as a Catholic be obliged to choose between Judas and Pilate? Between the Sadducees and the Pharisees? Both sides opposed Christ, though in different ways, and both participated, directly or indirectly, in His rejection. Why should it be considered unreasonable, indeed, incomprehensible, that one might reject all of “the options” precisely because one has chosen The Option: fidelity to Christ without compromise, without dilution, and without apology? This inability to comprehend such a refusal is a hallmark of the spirit of our age. We are told, constantly and insistently, that we must choose a side but always within the limits prescribed for us. The options are presented as exhaustive, as though nothing exists beyond them. Yet this is an illusion carefully manufactured by those who shape public discourse.

 

Through the media, through education, through cultural institutions, a false framework is constructed in which opposition is permitted, but only within controlled boundaries. The result is not true conflict, but a managed dialectic and a perpetual oscillation between alternatives that ultimately serve the same underlying principles.

 

Thus, while men argue, vote, protest, and align themselves with one faction or another, the fundamental orientation of society remains unchanged: it continues to move away from God. The debates may shift, the rhetoric may intensify, the personalities may change, but the trajectory remains constant. In such a system, participation almost always serves only to legitimize what ought to be rejected outright.

 

60% of good white Catholics voted for Trump; will they again?

 

Worse still, even those who recognize certain errors can become ensnared by this framework. Even we who call ourselves Traditional Catholics can become so attached to “our side” that we begin to think and act as partisans first and Catholics second.

 

We excuse what should be condemned, minimize what should be resisted, and defend what is, in truth, indefensible, simply because it is associated with our chosen camp. In doing so, we attempt to enlist Christ Himself in our cause, rather than conforming ourselves entirely to His. In doing so we expect Him to “take one for our team”.

 

As Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre observed, “we will never understand the struggle between good and evil throughout history unless we see it as the personal and unyielding battle, for all time, between Satan and Jesus Christ.”

 

This is the most concrete reality underlying all others. Every political system, every cultural movement, every ideological current ultimately aligns itself with one of these two kingdoms, but more often than not with the former.

 

Herein lies the truth from which modern man has been systematically diverted: there is no third option. One is either fighting on the side of Christ the King and His Army of Light, or one is, by action or by compromise, contributing to the dominion of Lucifer and the kingdom of darkness.

 

Our Lord leaves no room for ambiguity: “He that is not with Me is against Me; and he that gathereth not with Me scattereth.” In Deuteronomy, God sets before His people life and death, blessing and curse, commanding them to choose life.

 

There is no neutral ground, no safe middle, no space in which one may remain indefinitely undecided or conveniently detached. Likewise, Saint John teaches that “if we say we have fellowship with Him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth.” And Saint James delivers the stark warning: “whosoever therefore will be a friend of this world becometh an enemy of God.”

 

These are not abstract spiritual principles to be admired from a distance but the criteria by which our every allegiance must be judged. It is perhaps long past time for Catholics to measure their loyalties against these divine standards.

 

Does your “side” truly gather with Christ, or does it merely invoke His name while advancing principles contrary to His law? Does it defend life in its fullness, or does it tolerate and justify its destruction in certain cases? Does it uphold truth, or does it accommodate falsehood for the sake of influence, success, or expediency? Does it walk in the light, or does it shake hands with darkness while raping little girls on pedophile islands?

 

And perhaps the most penetrating question of all: is Christ truly King of your allegiance or is He made into a convenient symbol employed in the service of something else?

 

There is no third path. As Bob Dylan expressed in his own way, “you’re gonna have to serve somebody… it may be the Devil or it may be the Lord, but you’re gonna have to serve somebody.”

Our Lord Himself commanded us to count the cost of following Him, and warned that discipleship entails sacrifice, loss, and even isolation. “The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air nests; but the Son of Man hath not where to lay His head.” If this is true of the Master, how much more should it be expected of His servants?

 

Perhaps, then, it is time for Catholics to recognize that, in fidelity to Christ, we too may have nowhere to lay our heads, especially not within the structures of modern political and ideological life. We must resist the temptation to seek comfort, security, or identity in systems that are fundamentally disordered.

 

We must cease playing the game of choosing between two sides which, despite their apparent opposition, ultimately operate within the same framework that excludes the full and uncompromising reign of Christ.

 

 

And from LifeSiteNews:

Catholic author Phil Lawler and blogger Chris Jackson have warned that the Democrat Party may benefit from President Donald Trump’s feud with Pope Leo XIV and liberal Catholic prelates.

 

In a Monday post, Lawler criticized Cardinals Blase Cupich, Joseph Tobin, and Robert McElroy for a recent 60 Minutes interview, in which the three prelates took aim at Trump while celebrating Leo and ignoring issues like abortion.

 

“The three American cardinals who held forth on Sixty Minutes were all promoted by Pope Francis. They do not represent the mainstream thinking of the U.S. bishops’ conference. But they do represent the leftward lurch of the previous pontificate, which Pope Leo has done little to correct,” Lawler wrote.

 

“The concerted political attacks on President Trump represent the priorities of the past pontificate. The sooner Pope Leo can establish his own leadership style, the sooner the world will listen to his own more measured appeals for peace.”

 

Lawler also said that he thinks that the U.S. papal nuncio’s office has been orchestrating attacks on Trump but that Trump may suffer for “picking a fight with the Roman Pontiff.”

 

“The President will alienate many faithful Catholics – members of a key ‘swing’ constituency – while pleasing only those who are already fully behind him,” he wrote.

 

The U.S. president attacked Leo on Truth Social late Sunday after the Pontiff repeatedly condemned the U.S.-backed war on Iran and other Trump policies. 

 

READ: Has Leo XIV contradicted Catholic teaching on just war?

 

 

 

Trump claimed Leo had “weak” positions on crime and foreign policy, saying he doesn’t “want a Pope who thinks it’s terrible that America attacked Venezuela” or “who criticizes the President of the United States.”

 

Jackson, who writes the Hiraeth in Exile blog on Substack, posted to X on Monday a computer-generated graphic of Pope Leo with his hand on top of a donkey representing the Democratic Party, with rays emanating from its head, as if the Pope is blessing it. Prominent Democrats like Barack Obama and Kamala Harris look up at the Pope as if in gratitude and adoration. Angels hold a banner spelling out what the scene represents: “Midterms.”

 

Here is what’s actually going on, guys. #midterms #popeleoxiv #DonaldTrump #CatholicChurch pic.twitter.com/isWlnGMf7v

— Chris Jackson (@BigModernism) April 13, 2026

 

 

“Now, no public document proves some formal Vatican-Democratic election task force. That would be too easy. But politics rarely works that way. More often it works through converging incentives, useful idiots, flattering access, and mutually beneficial narratives.

 

So let us state the point carefully: there is no smoking gun proving coordination, but there is more than enough to explain why conservative Catholics would suspect that the Trump-Leo conflict is being leveraged to demoralize the right ahead of the midterms,” wrote Jackson in a Tuesday Substack post.

 

The group went so far as to assert that Trump’s remarks come amid a “well-organized” effort by the left to distance Catholics from the Republican Party. 

 

“The recent amplifications of a discord between Rome and the White House, oftentimes exaggerated, trace back to left-leaning ‘Catholics in name only,’ who are determined to swing the Catholic vote back in the other direction,” the post continued.

 

“This is a highly coordinated operation from key Obama advisors and prominent liberal Catholic clergy intentionally stoking the flames of discord with the intention of separating the Catholic base from the Republican Party,” wrote the Catholic advocacy group. 

Bishop Robert Barron, who is part of the Trump administration’s Religious Liberty Commission, similarly called on Donald Trump to apologize to Pope Leo XIV for criticizing him, though Barron praised Trump for his defense of religious liberty. Other high-ranking prelates, some of them heterodox, like Cardinal Tobin, have issued defenses of the pope as well. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/democrats-could-benefit-from-trump-and-leos-feud-catholic-authors-w

Sir John Everett Millais’ 1865 oil-on-canvas painting, Joan of Arc

St Joan of Arc, please pray for the Church and for the world