CARDINALS WILL IGNORE ANTIPOPE DEBATE; CATHOLICS WON'T

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 

 At last. The possibility that horrifies most Catholics (and the conviction that brings the remainder to their knees) that the two men most recently called 'the pope' - Francis and Leo - are nothing of the sort but in fact antipopes, has been very publicly acknowledged. John-Henry Westen of LifeSiteNews is petitioning the cardinalate to investigate. 

It's not as if the cardinals will beat their collective breast, repent of their silence and complicity in the Vatican regime and surrender their sinecures for the sake of truth. No. The value of Westen's invitation to all Catholics to sign lies in the choice made: sign, for Christ and His Church, or don't and side with error and apostasy.

The laws of the Church exist only to ensure the salvation of souls. But Jorge Bergoglio, illegally elected, manipulated his faux pontificate to wreak untold spiritual havoc and Robert Prevost (elected on the third ballot so how many of his cardinal-electors will want to investigate him?) has sworn to continue his predecessor's program. Neither Bergoglio nor Prevost has any validity and neither do their appointments - which renders merely academic any question of excommunication for the Society of St Pius X.

1n 1846 at La Salette, the Blessed Virgin Mary prophesied "two worm-ridden popes", and many believe Bergoglio and Prevost fill that bill. However, IF the cardinals investigate, and IF they find Bergoglio and Prevost to be truly popes, the Church is not competent to judge them: no man can judge the Roman pontiff. If on the other hand they were found to have denied Church teaching and were declared formal heretics, they ipso facto would lose faith and office.

And if they were declared antipopes, who, in a conciliar, synodal, apostate Church, could deliver justice? "We have not here but 5 loaves and 2 fishes..." (Mt 14:16). In the remnant of faithful clergy still inside the Barque of Peter, the Society of St Pius X springs to mind. 

self-explanatory

From John-Henry Westen:

There is a clear and definite break in the papal line after Pope Benedict XVI. Whereas previous popes may have led grievously sinful lives, they didn’t alter Church teaching in official documents. With Francis all that changed.

 

Let’s ignore the Pachamama idolatry of Francis and Leo’s allowance of the LGBT pilgrimage into St. Peter’s Basilica – which Bishop Schneider saw as the abomination of desolation entering the Holy Place, which Christ mentioned as a sign of the end times in Matthew 24.

 

Let’s ignore Francis saying all religions are pathways to God and Leo telling the Anglicans with their homosexual clergy and their female archbishops, “We are already one.”

 

READ: John-Henry Westen: An open letter to Cardinal Sarah on the SSPX

 

Let’s ignore Francis and Leo both giving audiences to the world’s most notorious homosexuality-promoting priest, Fr. James Martin.

 

Let’s ignore the Vatican-China deal struck under Francis and upheld under Leo where the Chinese Communist Party is able to name bishops, and the underground Church and her bishops are persecuted.

 

Let’s ignore Pope Leo’s appointment of many bishops who support women’s ordination and celebrate LGBT pride Masses.

 

Let’s focus only on official teaching documents which are contrary to the faith.

 

An antipope enabling his successor

Are we now to believe in blessings for homosexual couples as Fiducia Supplicans explicitly encourages? The spirit of Fiducia Supplicans is amply demonstrated by both Francis and Leo with their support for James Martin and his embrace of homosexuality.

 

Are we now to believe, as the revised Catechism under Francis teaches, that “the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person”? Believe that even when it flatly contradicts the witness of Sacred Scripture, St. Thomas Aquinas, Pope Pius XII, and the unbroken tradition that affirmed its legitimacy?

 

But of course, Pope Leo upholds it as he just told the world, “Someone who says I’m against abortion but says I’m in favor of the death penalty is not really pro-life.”

 

Must we now hold that divorced and remarried couples, without annulment or a commitment to continence, can under some circumstances be admitted to Holy Communion, as Amoris Laetitia and the Acta Apostolicae Sedis proclaim as official magisterium?

 

Do you affirm that the Novus Ordo is the sole legitimate expression of the Roman Rite, endorsing the severe restrictions on the Latin Mass as decreed in Traditionis Custodes, the subsequent rescript, and rigorously enforced under Leo?

 

And finally, are we now to deprive Our Lady – the Mother of God – of her titles of Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces, both proclaimed by saints and popes, as the document promulgated under Leo has demanded of us?

 

Has not Jesus sent His holy Mother to warn us of the apostasy? Did not Our Lady of La Salette – an approved apparition – tell us that “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of Anti-Christ”? Our Lady of La Salette also told us there would be “two worm-ridden popes.”

 

READ: Pope Leo is pushing the synodal error that process trumps truth

 

The famous stigmatist in France [presumably Marie-Julie Jahenny - ed] in the same century as La Salette, similarly prophesied that there would be “two successive anti-popes.”

 

And if the “private revelation” is a little too much for you, how about the public revelation in the Bible?

 

Christ Himself warned us “Many false prophets will arise and lead many astray.” (Matthew 24:11)

 

The first pope, St. Peter, warns us of “false teachers among you” who will “secretly introduce destructive heresies.” (2 Peter 2:1–2)

 

St. Luke warns similarly in Acts (20:29–30) “savage wolves will come in among you… even from your own number…”

 

 

Bishop Gaspard Béby Gnéba of Man Diocese, demoted by 'Pope Leo' for asking laity to report priests leading unchaste lives

The Catechism (CCC 675-677) describes a “final trial” that “will shake the faith,” a “religious deception” at the price of “apostasy,” and identifies the “supreme religious deception” as that of the Antichrist.

 

Pope St. John Paul II himself warned us of this 50 years ago in 1976 when he spoke (as Cardinal Wojtyła) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:

 

“We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think that wide circles of the American society or wide circles of the Christian community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the anti-Gospel.

 

This confrontation lies within the plans of divine Providence; it is trial which the whole Church… must take up.” https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/petition-to-cardinals-cant-we-consider-the-possibility-that-francis-and-leo-are-anti-popes/

John-Henry is the co-founder and CEO of LifeSiteNews.com. He and his wife Dianne have eight children and they live in the Ottawa Valley in Ontario, Canada.  

He has spoken at conferences and retreats, and appeared on radio and television throughout the world. John-Henry founded the Rome Life Forum, an annual strategy meeting for life, faith and family leaders worldwide. He is a board member of the John Paul II Academy for Human Life and the Family. He is a consultant to Canada’s largest pro-life organization Campaign Life Coalition, and serves on the executive of the Ontario branch of the organization. He has run three times for political office in the province of Ontario representing the Family Coalition Party.

John-Henry earned an MA from the University of Toronto in School and Child Clinical Psychology and an Honours BA from York University in Psychology.