UN AGENDA 2030 ACCELERATES A GLOBAL PRISON

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 

China, as you probably know, has Digital ID. And how! Biometric digital ID (verified by facial recognition cameras) is required before they can leave their neighbourhood zones. So it's hardly surprising that (on Halloween) when Italy announced mandatory digital ID for all citizens, the country erupted in revolt.From across the political spectrum they called a general strike, refusing to pay any tax until their government abandons the forced digital ID wallet.

The UN’s World Summit for Social Development has just opened in Doha, where they’re about to adopt a blueprint to impose digital ID systems in 50 countries by 2028. And the entire UN 2030 Agenda rests on one cornerstone: your voluntary adoption of Digital ID.

They're investing billions to sell you on its "convenience." They'll pitch it as the solution to illegal migration, voter fraud, and cybercrime. But this is a sales pitch for a surveillance prison. They learned how to do it from the vaccine passport rollout. New Zealand was their guinea pig and fell for it hook, line and sinker.

Now what do we do? Fall submissively into line like the Chinese, or RESIST and REBEL like the Italians? The least we can do is sign this petition (below). We might advisedly also draw most of our cash, keep it or buy gold or silver and a fireproof good quality safe. It's a plan B.

Plan A being, as always. PRAY.

https://citizengo.org/en-row/fr/16836-doha-summit--stop-the-un-s-agenda---

 

 

Italy revolts against Digital ID  

  

Rowan Dean: Digital ID marks the end of democracy

Australian broadcaster Rowan Dean has issued a stark warning. The global push toward digital identification systems is not a step forward for convenience or security, but a leap into what he calls “the end of democracy as we know it.”

 

Speaking on Sky News Australia, Dean outlined his belief that digital IDs are a gateway to total government control, drawing parallels to China’s social credit system and warning of a future where every aspect of daily life is monitored, restricted and dictated by bureaucrats, politicians, and corporate elites.

 

“A digital ID is the end of democracy as we know it,” Dean began. “It’s an irreversible step into a dystopian future, first with no cash, only digital currency controlled by governments, and eventually the ability for authorities to control and restrict every single aspect of your life.”

 

 

Dean referred to material published by the World Economic Forum (WEF), which illustrates how a digital identity could become central to all areas of life, from financial services and travel to healthcare, food access, and social media. He warned that what looks like a framework for convenience is in fact the foundation for surveillance and control on a global scale.

 

“Digital ID schemes potentially give absolute powers of surveillance and control over every aspect of your life to unelected bureaucrats, unscrupulous politicians and greedy corporations,” Dean said. “If you don’t think future authoritarian governments won’t use these powers ruthlessly, then you must have been fast asleep during COVID.”

 

Dean referenced the use of QR codes and vaccine mandates during the pandemic as evidence of how easily governments can expand and enforce intrusive technologies under the banner of safety.

 

According to a LifeSite News opinion piece he cited (see below - ed), the move toward digital identity systems has “nothing to do with curbing illegal immigration, securing jobs, or protecting youth online”. Instead, Dean said, it represents the “linchpin of a global surveillance state” being advanced by organisations like the United Nations.

 

Whistleblower and former Silicon Valley technologist Aman Jabi also featured in Dean’s report, describing how social recognition technology could soon be used to “unlock your digital identity”, turning basic access to daily services into a privilege contingent on compliance.

 

“The plan,” Jabi warned, “is to lock up humanity in smart cities, a superset of the so-called 15-minute city, where water management means rationing, traffic monitoring means limited mobility, and energy conservation means rationed heat, electricity and fuel.”

 

 

Dean noted that UK Labour leader Keir Starmer is already pursuing a mandatory digital ID system under the guise of tackling immigration issues, and he predicted similar efforts could soon appear in Australia.

 

He also criticised the growing push to tie digital identification to age verification for social media use, calling it a clever way to normalise the system under the pretext of “protecting children.”

 

“What better way to trick the public into getting a digital ID than linking it to restricting under-16s from social media?” Dean asked. “Suddenly it’s ‘for the kids’, and before you know it, facial recognition and biometric surveillance are part of everyday life.”

 

As Australia prepares to announce its own policy on age restrictions for under-16s online, Dean warned viewers to listen carefully for key terms like “digital identification,” “biometrics,” and “facial recognition.”

 

“If you hear those words, you’ll know the fix is in,” he concluded. “Surrender to a digital ID, and you surrender your children’s freedom and your own.” Rowan Dean: Digital ID marks the end of democracy

The lowdown in detail from Lifesitenews:

 

 Digital ID and biometrical facial scans for online age verification are quickly becoming passports to the internet thanks to legislation and big tech policy changes.

 

As governments begin enforcing age identity checks, Big Tech and social media companies are following suit with sweeping updates affecting all users in all parts of the globe.

 

READ: How I got Grok to admit the truth about homosexual ‘parenting’ studies

 

In September 2018 the World Economic Forum (WEF) published a report stating that digital identity will determine your level of access to information.

 

Fast-forward seven years, and this is has become a reality as digital IDs and biometric facial scanning become the new normal for passing internet checkpoints.

 

“This digital identity determines what products, services and information we can access – or, conversely, what is closed off to us.” — WEF, Identity in a Digital World: A new chapter in the social contract, September 2018

 

 

The new laws and policies come under the guise of “child safety,” but when looked at through a different lens, the message can be easily inverted to mean “adult endangerment” as everyone’s speech and access to information will be dependent upon some form of digital ID for accessing search engines and social media.

 

Whether through a government mandate or through the fusion of corporation and state via public-private partnerships, the years-long agenda to rollout internet passports is steaming ahead.

 

Here, we take a look at legislation coming from the European Union (EU), the U.K., Australia, and the U.S., as well as big tech policies being implemented and how they will impact all of society.

 

The EU Digital Services Act

 

https://twitter.com/i/status/1953109476694786073

The European Commission is in the process of testing an age verification app prototype that is built upon the EU Digital Identity Wallet framework.

 

Five nations have agreed to be guinea pigs for this new experiment:

 

• Denmark
• France
• Greece
• Italy
• Spain

The European Commission website is awash with ways this type of internet passport will protect children.

 

The announcement includes quotes like: “Making sure our children and young people are safe online is of paramount importance,” and “Children deserve a safe digital childhood,” and “They [guidelines] will ensure that children and young people can continue to enjoy the opportunities the online world.”

 

But beneath it all, adults will be equally impacted, and this is yet another backdoor or Trojan Horse for coercive biometric surveillance and digital identity adoption for all.

 

“Built upon the robust European Digital Identity Wallet framework, this user-friendly and privacy-preserving age verification solution enables individuals to demonstrate their eligibility for age-restricted online services, such as those restricted to adults, without disclosing more personal information than absolutely necessary.” — European Commission, EU Age Verification Solution, July 2025

 

 READ: WEF elects BlackRock’s Larry Fink as new co-chair, alleges no misconduct in Klaus Schwab

“A core objective of this initiative is to deliver a consistent, secure, privacy-preserving and user-friendly age verification experience that can be easily integrated into a wide variety of digital services throughout the European Union.

 

The modular architecture and adherence to open standards not only ensure interoperability between national systems, but also allow online service providers to adapt the solution to their own technical and regulatory environments.” — European Commission, EU Age Verification Solution, July 2025.

 

According to the EC:

The age verification blueprint […] lays the groundwork for broader deployment of age-appropriate based services in the future and is built on the same technical specifications as the European Digital Identity Wallets (eID) that are to be rolled out before the end of 2026.

 

This ensures compatibility between the two and enables the integration of the age verification functionality in the future eID Wallets.

 

This is not just about children. It’s getting everybody onboard with digital ID, continuous facial recognition monitoring, and internet passports.

 

This digital ID and internet passport rollout is part of the EU Digital Services Act (DSA).

 

Recently, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee obtained documents from the European Commission exposing the DSA as a tool for censorship, where a sentence like “We need to take back our country” is considered to be “illegal hate speech.”

 

If platforms don’t comply with censorship recommendations from EC-approved NGOs and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), then the platforms can get fined up to 6 percent of their global earnings:

The DSA is being used to censor political speech, including humor and satire. Documents produced to the Committee under subpoena show that European censors target core political speech that is neither harmful nor illegal, attempting to stifle debate on topics such as immigration and the environment.

 

 

READ: Trump says he’s spoken to China’s Xi Jinping about imprisoned Catholic Jimmy Lai

 

On May 7, 2025, the EC held a workshop with the biggest names in tech, NGOs, and CSOs called the “DSA Multi-Stakeholder Workshop on Systemic Risks and their Mitigation.”

 

One participant, Access Now, which ironically claims to advocate freedom of expression while promoting digital identification systems, remarked that “everything that can be considered as hateful and harmful” should be removed from platforms.

 

 

With the European Commission completely committed to enforcing internet passports, digital ID, and censorship, the U.K. is following suit.

 

The UK Online Safety Act

 

With the enactment of the Online Safety Act (OSA), which also claims to protect children, everyone must submit to an internet passport check when accessing social media and other large user-to-user services, which the bill refers to as Category 1 services.

 

Like with the EU, we see that this is not aimed at just allegedly protecting children – this is also aimed at adults.

 

The bill uses Orwellian doublespeak with phrases like “Adults will have more control over the content they see,” which actually means that adults will see what the algorithms nudge them to see.

 

They will be nudged toward content from “verified users” – the ones who sign up for digital ID schemes or give up their biometrics through facial scans for the internet passport check:

Adult users of such [Category 1] services will be able to verify their identity and access tools which enable them to reduce the likelihood that they see content from non-verified users and prevent non-verified users from interacting with their content. This will help stop anonymous trolls from contacting them.

 

 According to the User identity verification section of the OSA:

• A provider of a Category 1 service must offer all adult users of the service the option to verify their identity (if identity verification is not required for access to the service).
• The verification process may be of any kind (and in particular, it need not require documentation to be provided).

 

Here we see that even if an identity check isn’t required, it still must be offered.

 

And if the age check doesn’t require documentation, the most obvious alternative is continuous facial scanning, which acts like a living digital ID where your image is always up-to-date in real-time.

 

Any government may say that the data collected will be erased and that privacy will be secured, but how long will those assurances last when a new regime is in power or when a new emergency is declared?

 

“Category 1 services will also need to proactively offer adult users optional tools, at the first opportunity, to help them reduce the likelihood that they will encounter certain types of legal content.” — U.K. Government, Online Safety Act, July 2025.

 

WATCH: How to remain hopeful in the face of a disintegrating world

 

On the censorship front, the OSA states that “Services will be required to take steps to remove illegal disinformation content if they become aware of it on their services,” and these services will also need to reduce the likelihood that adults will see “certain types of legal content” – like self-harm.

 

But definitions can be vague. Repercussions sweeping.

 

Criticizing climate change policies like net zero, or questioning public health authorities could all be considered forms of self-harm.

 

After all, a threat to the planet is a threat to the self, and questioning public health authorities is the same as questioning science itself, which is dangerous to everyone.

Once digital ID and other forms of internet passports are in place, the move toward censorship becomes that much easier.

 

Now let’s look to Australia’s requirements for internet passport checkpoints.

 

The Australian Online Safety Act

 

Australia’s Online Safety Act claims to be all about protecting children, but yet again, we see it is about casting a digital dragnet over everyone.

 

When the section for social media minimum age was introduced, Senator Malcolm Roberts warned in 2024 that the continuous facial recognition scanning would cover adults as well as children and that the cameras would always be watching.

 

“The issue is not who signs in to social media; the issue is who’s using the account,” said Roberts. “This requires the device camera to always be on to check the user’s image against their digital ID to prevent, for instance, someone’s younger siblings from taking over the session.”

 

Roberts also warned that the constant surveillance coming out of the OSA could lead to censorship under the guise of combatting so-called misinformation and disinformation.

Conversation

Kat A 

@SaiKate108

Senator Malcolm Roberts just issued a scathing assessment of the Australian uniparty’s proposed age ban of 16 on social media. Highlighting the dire ramifications of policing which would require the device camera always be on. ‘To answer the question is this person over 16 would require every Australian’s biometric data. Who knows what else this identification and surveillance will do without our knowledge.’ Increased surveillance under the guise of safety. You know the drill.

https://x.com/SaiKate108/status/1805108679580201294?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1805108679580201294%7Ctwgr%5E67b994ddde867c833af4222b94991e867203a189%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fopinion%2Finternet-passports-incoming-how-digital-id-has-become-the-new-norm%2F

“The new law puts the onus on social media platforms, not parents or children, to take reasonable steps to ensure fundamental protections for under 16s are in place.” — Australia eSafety Commissioner, Social Media Age Restrictions, July 2025.

In Australia, it is the responsibility of the platforms to enforce age checks for accessing content that the government says is appropriate for children. The decision is not up to the parents.

And while Australia’s “Social Media Minimum Age” Fact Sheet “Specifies that no Australian will be compelled to use government identification (including Digital ID) to prove their age online,” this doesn’t prevent private companies from using facial scans for compliance.

“Digital identity apps were proposed as an effective AV method as an individual’s personal information remains stored on their phone.” — Australia eSafety Commissioner, Age Verification Consultation, August 2021.

READ: Apocalypse addiction isn’t helping us solve the world’s problems

According to the age assurance call for evidence:

• Digital identity apps were proposed as an effective AV [Age Verification] method as an individual’s personal information remains stored on their phone. QR codes or links can be used to connect with the app and allow for an age attribute to be shared with the requesting site or platform.
• Physical age tokens can be used to generate an online password for any age-restricted content. Mobile operator age checks were also suggested.
• Facial analysis technology was presented as a suitable biometric option, particularly for individuals who do not have government identity documents. It allows for one-time facial scans which estimate a user’s age – no data is stored.

The nudge toward using facial analysis technology is almost universal.

The call for evidence talks about a “one-time facial scan” but what does that mean? You only need to scan your face once and never again?

Or does “one-time” mean you have to scan your face “one-time” for each time you log on?

And just how accurate is this technology at determining the difference between a 15-year-old and a 16-year-old?

What happens when a 16-year-old scans their face to log on, and then hands it over to a 15-year-old?

Digital identity lies in wait as the perfect back-up scheme.

Australia commenced the Digital ID Act in 2024, and is currently trialing digital ID for online age verification.

If the bill is ever ratified, the study could then go on to explore the solutions presented by the EU, the U.K., and Australia like digital ID, facial scanning, credit cards, government issued IDs, and physical age tokens.

When it comes to Google: Some content and services are subject to age verification. To access age-restricted content or services, the company may ask to confirm your age with a valid government ID, or a valid credit card.

For Google-owned YouTube, the video platform recently began using AI to interpret a variety of signals to determine whether a user is over or under 18.

These signals include the types of videos a user is searching for, the categories of videos they have watched, or the longevity of the account.

READ: Deep State in deep trouble? How recent events are unraveling the liberal global order

In the case of a false positive, the user will have the option to verify that they are 18 or over, such as using a credit card or a government ID.

And Spotify is testing age assurance technologies in select markets with its own internal age estimation technology and partnering with digital identity company Yoti.

Spotify also enlists facial scan technologies for age checks.

With more and more internet passport legislation being enacted, more and more private companies are following suit.

From vaccine passports to internet passports: The global march toward digital ID and biometric surveillance

 

 

 

 

The agenda to require digital identity and biometric surveillance in order to access social media platforms and to use search engines has been years in the making.

The technological foundation is in place, but the rules have been set in pencil.

If you didn’t show proof of vaccination during lockdowns, you were “killing grandma.”

Now we’re going from vaccine passports to internet passports.By showing proof of age, you are protecting children. It’s all inverted.https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/internet-passports-incoming-how-digital-id-has-become-the-new-norm/