Tuesday, 30 September 2025

DAVOS INC'S MSM IGNORES DECAPITATED CHRISTIANS


 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.







The battle lines in the apocalyptic conflict between good and evil were delineated by the assassination of Charlie Kirk and are becoming clearer by the day. Rejecting statehood for Palestine and the "terrorist breeding ground" of Gaza, New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters has placed this nation on the right side of history - and the wrong side of Davos Inc. 



Lefties who jump up and down for Palestine are the same sad lunatics who waded into  Kirk and even worse, his grieving widow Erika. Te Pati Maori, Labour, Greens: all rainbow warriors who'd be chucked off Palestinian rooftops. Maori radicals who are not indigenous to New Zealand belly-aching about indigenous 'rights' for Palestinians who aren't indigenous either - they all straddle the  headlines daily in our socialist mainstream media which side with Islam.



The Islam which threatens the UK with intifada and is turning the UK into a Muslim Caliphate, where white men get longer sentences for FB posts than migrants do for raping minors - because the judiciary protects the state which protects Davos Inc from online criticism - is the same Islam which slaughters and decapitates Christians by the dozen in the Congo and Nigeria. But the MSM are too full of whining victims to find room on its pages and airwaves for Christians massacred by Muslims. 


Because the MSM are controlled by the neo-Marxists of Davos Inc.




In the parish of Saint Joseph of Manguredjipa where many were killed at a vigil for those already dead 



From Lifesitenews:  


 

At least 64 people were killed in an anti-Christian massacre carried out by an Islamist group in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

 

According to a report by Aid to the Church in Need (ACN), the attack took place on September 8 and 9 in Ntoyo, in the parish of Saint Joseph of Manguredjipa, in the province of North Kivu.

 

 



 

The murderous rampage was carried out by the Allied Democratic Forces, an Islamic militia originally from Uganda.

 

Local sources say at least 64 were killed in the massacre in which the attackers used firearms and hammers and selectively lit certain homes on fire, which suggests a premeditated and targeted terror attack on Christians. Many of the victims were murdered while taking part in a vigil for the dead.

 

ACN denounced the massacre and expressed its solidarity and “deep concern” for the families of the victims:

 

In this context of pain, ACN echoes the condolence message sent by Bishop Melchisédech Sikuli Paluko of Butembo-Beni:

 

“To all the families affected by this umpteenth and horrible carnage […] and to all the faithful of the parish, we express our spiritual closeness. May God, the Master of Life, strengthen us through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, consoler of the afflicted, and lead us beyond the desert of present-day suffering to lasting peace.”

 

The Allied Democratic Forces are affiliated with the Islamic State’s Central Africa Province (IS-CAP) and has been responsible for several massacres in eastern Congo, “which have been characterized by their extreme violence against civilians, especially Christians,” ACN writes.

 

The attacks on September 8 and 9 mark the most recent in a series of atrocities in eastern Congo. At least 40 people were killed during a prayer vigil on July 27 in a church in Kamanda, Ituri. In February, over 70 dead bodies were discovered in a Protestant church in Lubero, many of which had been decapitated.

 

READ: Congo bishops condemn lack of response after Islamic terrorists kill over 40 Catholics

 

ACN described the situation in eastern Congo as “dire,” as violence has intensified, leading to the displacement of large parts of the population and a severe humanitarian crisis. The attacks and massacres on Christians and other civilians have continued despite the heavy presence of Congolese armed forces and Ugandan troops, as well as a U.N. mission.

 

 



 




Our Lady Help of Christians, pray for us

Sunday, 28 September 2025

OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Please note, anti-Catholic rants are not posted on this page except to elucidate Church doctrine.






 Christ Giving the Keys of the Kingdom to St. Peter (Perugino, Sistine Chapel),




"Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus: outside the Church there is no salvation." 


That eternal truth has been proclaimed through the centuries by the Catholic Church - until the Second Vatican Council revolutionaries buried it as a stumbling block to their globalist, New World Church of Nice. But as truth it remains true today that Christ gave all grace to His Mystical Body, the Church, and no grace is given to humanity except through her.


Just over a week before he was assassinated, Charlie Kirk told Bishop Joseph Brennan of Fresno, California, that he was "this close" to entering the Catholic Church. He said Protestants and Evangelicals under-venerate Mary. "She was a vessel for our Lord and Saviour. One of the ways that we fix toxic feminism in America is that Mary is the solution.” 


Kirk died a martyr's death by way of baptism of desire - very nearly explicit and certainly implicit, because Kirk's whole life was dedicated to God and doing His will, and the recognises that state of mind and heart as implicit baptism by desire. What stopped him from professing faith in the Church of Rome was Antipope Francis - and his successor, Leo, because he recognised them as Marxists who by definition are alien to Christ and His Gospel.


Kirk's assassination polarized the world, mesmerising humanity and dividing it between good and evil. Hundreds of thousands of Catholics publicly prayed for his soul, that he might be granted salvation. They were joined by shocked and grieving Christians of all denominations who believed his faith alone had saved him. At the same time, hatred for Charlie Kirk and his Catholic wife Erika was spewed over the media, spurring spontaneous affirmation of good, and recoil from evil.






Carpe diem! As millions around the world are confronted with that visceral choice between God and His ancient enemy, Satan, the Catholic Church must seize the moment and speak the truth, in the media and from pulpits everywhere: "outside the Church there is no salvation"


However. The counterfeit, Ape Church - the conciliar, Novus Ordo, post-Bergoglio Synodal sect installed in the Vatican - has fallen into the heresies of modernism and indifferentism. Antipope Francis infamously claimed that "all religions are paths to God" - which according to Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos, is a "perverse opinion ... spread by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained". 


Pope Leo XVI has failed to correct the Francis "fraud". And while Kirk's grieving widow Erika proclaimed Christ to the nations at his funeral, the Bishop of Rome and the Bishop’s Conference of his own country shamefully hid in silence. It's very evident then, that the faithful "remnant" (Rom 9,27) - the small number of the children of Israel who will be converted and saved - must take up the slack to define and proclaim this Church doctrine which pre-Vatican II was straightforward, but post-conciliar is a train-wreck of expanded meanings and reinterpretation by virtue of the new collegiality.


And what d'you know, right on cue up pops a reader of this blog. 'Michael' gives a cogent explanation (below) of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus:


The Church exists in Heaven, in Purgatory, and for now, on Earth - the Church Triumphant, The Church Suffering, and the Church Militant.

 

The Church is not a NGO or a nation state in Italy. The Church is Jesus Christ and those people who belong to Him. The word "catholic" comes from the Greek word καθολικός (katholikos) meaning “regarding the whole” or, said another way, the full Truth - all of it.

 

Everyone in Heaven can be said to be Catholic because they have already attained the beatific vision. They are with God and therefore they know the whole truth. Likewise those in Purgatory have had their personal judgement and have been judged by Jesus Christ, The High Priest and King of His nation.


Ergo, there is no salvation outside the Church which is Jesus Christ and the people who belong to Him. All who are allowed by Christ to pass through the Gate, which is Himself, are in His Church. There is no other gate into heaven. A person must be in the Church in order to belong to Christ. Hence, “Outside the Church there is no salvation.”

 

There are those people who formally belong to the visible Church on Earth, i.e. they are baptised and, if over the age of reason, confirmed into the Catholic Church.

 

But the Catholic Church has always taught that "nothing else is needed to obtain justification than an act of perfect charity and of contrition. Whoever under the impulse of actual grace elicits these acts receives immediately the gift of sanctifying grace, and is numbered among the children of God” (Fr George Hayward Joyce SJ (1864-1943)). 


So it is possible, even in today’s world, to die and be in the Church by desire, but not to be formally in the Church Militant. There have been martyrs who died without being baptised with water, but who desired to belong to Christ, and were killed because of their love for Christ (see the 40 Martyrs of Sebaste, 320AD).

 

And Charlie Kirk. How many thousands, or perhaps more, of good people have been prevented from formally entering the ark of salvation that is the Catholic Church by their instinctive antipathy towards Antipope Francis and his suave, anodyne successor, Leo? 


However, anyone who knows that Jesus Christ is God, and that He wants all men to belong to His Church, who then rejects some or all of the Truth also rejects Christ, and is thus outside of the Church.

 

That would include those people sitting in the pews on Sunday who deny any aspect of the Faith, and Protestants.

 

 

Charlie and Erika Kirk in her parish church, St Bernadette's, Scottsdale Arizona

 


Cardinal Gerhard Müller has posited that “Charlie Kirk was the victim of an atheistic ideology, whose followers erupted in satanic celebration over the heinous murder of an exemplary husband and family man. The devil always takes possession of those who hate life and truth.” Citing Scripture, he added, “For, according to the words of the Lord Jesus Christ, the devil is a ‘murderer from the beginning’ and the ‘father of lies’ (John 8:44). And only those who hear the words of God are of God (cf. John 8:47).”


Men and women of truly good will (God's will) are saved in their religion (whether it be Protestantism, Islam, Animism, whatever) but not by that religion: they are saved only by God's One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.


Which means that Catholics, Protestants and Muslims who sit in pews on Sundays or put their forehead to the ground 5 times every day, but deny any aspect of God's will as defined by His Church (like the sinfulness of contraception or abortion), will not be saved without repentance and conversion of heart.


Our Lord Himself said to the Jews of His day, “If you do not believe that I am He [the Messiah], you will die in your sins” (John 8:24). If you believe that Christ is the Messiah you will be saved by Him not in any of the thousands of man-made religions but by baptism of desire into the Church founded by the Son of God on the "rock" of Peter.


“One cannot have [salvation] except in the Catholic Church. Outside the Catholic Church one can have everything except salvation. One can have honor, one can have the sacraments, one can sing alleluia, one can answer Amen, one can have the Gospel, one can have faith in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and preach, but never can one find salvation except in the Catholic Church” (St Augustine – Sermon to the People of the Church of Caesarea, Chapter 6).



 

"One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic"

 :


Mater Ecclesiae, ora pro nobis

Mother of the Church, pray for us



 

 

 




 


 








 





 






Friday, 26 September 2025

MAORI WARDS ARE RACIST, MAORI SEATS ARE RACIST; NZ SAY IT OUT LOUD


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.
















The time for Nice in New Zealand is long gone. Kiwis are far too nice for their own good - or are they more cowardly than nice? Because racism is evil and the racism of Te Pati Maori and the media, the judiciary and bureaucracy which enable racism are evil, and Maori seats and wards all promote that evil, and must no longer be tolerated. 


Muriel Newman calls Kiwis complacent (smug) but what she means to say is complaisant (compliant or complicit). "Nothing further is necessary to the triumph of evil than the silence of good men", said Edmund Burke. In other words, the Kiwi attitude of "she'll be right" has led to wrong, and evil as embodied in Te Pati Maori and its fellow-travellers, is well on its way to triumph in our fair land, which is fast turning foul. 


Charlie Kirk refused to tolerate evil. He believed in God Who is good, Who gave him courage to defend the truth - and arguably, baptism of desire, in his intention to become a Catholic. New Zealand has to make do with the Protestant Brian Tamaki because, in a crisis eerily similar to New Zealand's, the Catholic Church seems to have succumbed to a takeover by a cult quite alien to Christ. Installed in the Vatican and typified by Pope Leo XIV and New Zealand's bishops, it's a Church of Nice which objects to nothing.


But if Kiwis don't object to the racist radicals in our midst, their niceness will trap New Zealand in a land of Nasty.

 

self-explanatory 



So now here's Muriel Newman of  the NZ Centre for Political Research:


The ‘Maorification’ of New Zealand is not by accident. For decades tribal leaders have been plotting and scheming how to get their hands on the levers of power. Their objective is full control of our country.

 

It is now obvious that they are a long way down the path to achieving their goal. If there’s no counter-movement, they will succeed.

 

We don’t need to guess what the consequences would be if the radicalised get their way: South Africa and Zimbabwe come to mind, although in those countries it was the majority that sought to overthrow minority rule.

 

In New Zealand it’s a minority of subversives who are attempting to seize control from a complacent public – assisted by successive governments: Jim Bolger and John Key made the radicals stronger by appeasing their demands, while Helen Clark and Jacinda Ardern pro-actively progressed their cause.

 

While the concept of a radical minority of activists engineering a transfer of state authority to private tribal corporations may seem preposterous, it’s important to recognise this constitutional insurgence did not happen overnight.

 

The ideological groundwork was laid in the seventies. Radical activists Donna Awatere Huata, now Maori Climate Commissioner and a former Member of Parliament, and Ripeka Evans – currently Deputy Chairman of TVNZ – played a pivotal role. Travelling to Cuba to collaborate with Palestine Liberation Front extremists, they developed a revolutionary plan to transform New Zealand into a Maori Nation State.

 

Their fundamental objective was to secure control of New Zealand land: “Maori sovereignty is the Maori ability to determine our own destiny… New Zealand is Maori land. The aim is to reclaim all land. This country belongs to Maori.”

 

Now, fifty years later, the modern-day manifestation of this revolutionary movement is the Maori Party in Parliament. Their website confirms a key policy is the return of land: private land, as well as government-owned land including the Conservation Estate, along with council land and the country’s entire foreshore and seabed.

 

They plan to secure power through a new constitution based on the Treaty of Waitangi. They want all Waitangi Tribunal recommendations to be made binding, the country to be called Aotearoa, with all ‘official’ names of places and agencies in Maori, control of Education and Health, Corrections and the Police – in other words, they want to turn New Zealand into a Maori Nation State.

 


Heads of defeated enemies or venerated ancestors, carefully prepared in elaborate rituals, were collected by Major General Horatio Gordon Robley


To achieve their goal, they have replaced their real history of tribal warfare, slavery and cannibalism, with a narrative of victimhood and grievance in order to drive a radical campaign of disinformation against the Coalition Government. Calling for mass rebellion, tensions are now so high that Maori Party insurgence has become a real threat to social order.

 

It’s important to remember that the Maori Party is only in Parliament because they have guaranteed Maori seats. The question that needs to now be asked is why those seats are tolerated, given they have become a power base for dangerous extremists who wish to destroy our democracy.

 

The Maori seats are a privilege the Maori Party does not deserve.

 

Introduced in the early years of our new Parliament to ensure Maori had the right to vote, the Maori seats should have been abolished in 1893 when New Zealand adopted universal suffrage, and all adults gained the right to vote.

 

A public mandate on their future is long overdue. New Zealanders deserve the right to decide whether the Maori seats in Parliament should stay or go – just as the Coalition has given voters the right to accept or reject Maori seats in local government.

 

In fact, with a referendum on a four-year term of Parliament likely to be held at the next election, the Coalition should deliver a Constitutional Trifecta: an opportunity for voters to not only decide whether to give politicians an extra year in power, but also, whether the Maori seats should be retained or removedand whether the voting age should be lowered to 16.

 


A NO vote on the introduction of a four year term, NO to the retention of the Maori Seats, and NO to reducing the voting age to 16, would ensure that when the toxic trio of Labour, the Greens and the Maori Party gain power, their destructive influence would last only three years, not four; that the anarchists seeking to destroy democracy would no longer get a free pass into Parliament; and that the idea of using impressionable 16-year olds to secure electoral advantage, would be rejected by New Zealand voters once and for all.

 

 

Back when Donna Awatere outlined her vision for Maori Sovereignty, she dismissed public opposition as an obstacle: “The strength of white opposition will be allayed by the fact that Maori sovereignty will not be taken seriously. Absolute conviction in the superiority of white culture will not allow most white people to even consider the possibility.

 

Those words have proved prophetic – but not quite in the way envisaged.

 

The key reason New Zealanders have not resisted the tribal takeover is that activists pursued an incremental approach to avoid triggering public alarm. With operatives embedded deep within the machinery of the State decades ago in a classic Marxist ‘march through the institutions’, many changes were engineered from within.

 


They could just as well be Moriori


This week’s NZCPR Guest Commentator Dr Roger Oppenshaw, Emeritus Professor of Education at Massey University, has provided two papers investigating such a change. In his research paper, “Separate but Equal?” – see HERE – he uses Archive New Zealand records to trace how the Maori elite elevated ‘Matauranga Maori’ onto an equal footing with ‘Western Science’, and his commentary “Education and Identity Politics” (HERE) discusses the implications:

 

“The role of the Maori elite in promoting Maori Science has been crucial to the subject’s success. In this case a relatively small, carefully selected grouping of those deemed to be ‘in the know’ came to define what Maori Science was to be about and what it should include.

 

“During the first half of the 1990s, this neo-tribal elite was able to gain official recognition for Maori Science as a key part of Matauranga Maori (literally Maori ways of knowing). Matauranga Maori is in fact, derived from a worldwide ideology known as Culturalism, which has it that all cultures have legitimate and equal claims. For Maori Science advocates this meant they could claim equal partnership under the Treaty with what advocates disparagingly labelled ‘Western’ Science.”

 

Professor Openshaw explains that these changes led to ‘science’ being progressively devalued by many educators as a symbol of oppression and colonisation. With such radical indoctrination being taught in our schools, it is little wonder that student achievement in science has been falling!

 

In 2017, when Jacinda Ardern became Prime Minister and Labour won all of the Maori seats, the incremental approach to institutional capture was replaced by a coordinated strategy spearheaded by a new government agency working in collaboration with tribal leaders.

 

The Office of Maori-Crown Relations reshaped the State sector from within, embedding a radical Treaty indoctrination framework across government – and when Labour won a majority in 2020, the floodgates were opened.

 

 




At that stage, confident of success and buoyed by media support – thanks to a $55 million Public Interest Journalism Fund that linked payouts to the promotion of the Maori sovereignty agenda Labour revealed He Puapua, their secret blueprint to replace democracy with tribal rule, and the race to the finish-line began in earnest.

 

Fortunately, not all journalists were captured. Thanks to Newstalk ZB’s Barry Soper, the revelation that the tribal takeover of health through the Maori Health Authority was resulting in Maori patients being prioritised ahead of those in greater clinical need, sparked such a severe public backlash that not only was clinical urgency restored as a cornerstone of our health system, but the Authority itself was dismantled.

 

However, most of the framework that embedded Treaty rights and the noose of cultural competency within the State sector during Labour’s time in office is still there.

 

Breaking free is not easy – as can be seen from reports opposing the Inland Revenue Department’s disestablishment of its Maori research and evaluation team, and Pharmac’s termination of their specialist Maori and anti-racism advisors.

 

Since virtually every government agency was targeted by He Puapua activists – including independent organisations such as the Reserve Bank and the Auditor General – it is surely time for a co-ordinated purge. If the Labour-appointed radicals within the State sector are not outed, government agencies will continue their journey towards a Maori Nation State, thwarting Coalition attempts at reform.

 

This can be seen in the actions of the Local Government Commission – an independent Crown Entity of three members initially appointed by former Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta.

 

Tasked by that Minister with developing a universal code of conduct for elected members of local authorities, their draft code includes a Treaty clause aligned with Labour’s He Puapua agenda. This comes in spite of a recent High Court ruling confirming that local authorities are not Treaty partners, and that councillors therefore hold no Treaty obligations.


With submissions on their draft code open until midnight on Friday 26 September, we urge anyone concerned to not only send a quick email to the Commission at lgc@lgc.govt.nz recommending that the Treaty Clause 8 be removed from the proposed Code of Conduct, but to also send an email to Local Government Minister, Simon Watts at simon.watts@parliament.govt.nz asking him to withdraw the Code entirely, since it should be councils themselves that decide such matters, not central government.

 

Please note: All MP addresses can be found HERE.

 


Tribal takeover of culture



The reality is that someone would need to be blind and deaf these days not to recognise the tribal takeover. Whether at sporting events, cultural functions, workplaces, or even watching TV at home, the Maori Sovereignty agenda now dominates.

 

It’s not just government agencies, the media, and, increasingly, the Judiciary, that have been captured, but a multitude of private sector organisations too – including New Zealand Opera!

 

Since attempts to push back against such developments will often result in strong opposition and accusations of racism, almost everyone backs off.

 

What this unfortunately means, is that all it takes to capture an organisation is for one determined activist to join their ranks and demand the inclusion of Treaty rights. While most others may be opposed, all too often they acquiesce in order to avoid a confrontation.

 

To their credit, Coalition partners have been pushing back against such intimidation in their drive to rein in Maori sovereignty activism.

 

While David Seymour, Winston Peters and Shane Jones have taken the lead, National’s Chris Bishop appears to be joining their ranks – if a recent speech in Parliament where he took aim at the Maori Party, is anything to go by:

 

“Then we have Te Pati Maori. Now, where to start on these clowns? Takuta Ferris posted this on Instagram – ‘Indians, Asians, Black and Pakeha campaigning to take a Maori seat from Maori’. It doesn’t get much more racist than that. I’m prepared to call it racist.

 

Thousands of New Zealanders think it’s racist – actually, most people think it’s racist … and we’ve got to make sure that these clowns in Te Pati Maori and their bench mates in the Green Party—who seem to stand up for all of it – are never allowed anywhere near the Treasury benches, or they will drive this country into ruin.”

 

Is this the beginning of the real push back by the Coalition that New Zealanders have been hoping for? Or is National only now realising the race issue is one they can no longer avoid.

 

Over the years, with pro-active support from Labour, the tribal sovereignty movement has embedded the framework for a separatist nation-state deep within government institutions. This constitutional transformation was never approved by the public – yet it continues to shape policy, funding, and governance.

 

If democracy in New Zealand is to endure, these race-based structures must be dismantled by the Coalition. For far too long, the push toward tribal supremacy has been downplayed or ignored – yet its influence over public institutions is growing stronger. It’s time to draw the line and take our country back.

Please note: To register for our free weekly newsletter please click HERE.

https://www.nzcpr.com/reinstating-democracy/

 


 




Mary, Terror of Demons, pray for New Zealand