Elise du Fresne says on Facebook that 'the top hits on google' were to links showing no connection between abortion and breast cancer.
My reply:
The fact
that the top hits on google show links to ‘highly reputable organisations’ saying
there’s no link between abortion and breast cancer demonstrates, first up, an
exercise in wishful thinking.
Women who’ve
had an abortion understandably want ‘proof’ they’re not going to get breast
cancer. Women who have breast cancer want ‘proof’ their abortion wasn’t its
cause. So they google the stuff that ‘proves’ they’re right.
Secondly,
‘highly reputable organisations’ such as Planned Parenthood and its affiliates
make billions out of abortions - which are a major driver for breast cancer. IPPF has
considerable influence at United Nations, claiming a universal right not just
to abortion but for ‘access to’ abortion (i.e. Planned Parenthood services),
including for adolescents. The American Cancer Society has in the past funded
Planned Parenthood. The Centres for Disease Control employs Dr Deborah
Nucatola, infamously caught on camera enjoying salad and a glass of wine while
discussing which bits of unborn babies mustn’t be crushed during abortion
because Planned Parenthood wants them preserved intact, to sell them. Money talks, and Planned Parenthood's billions, made from women's misery, tell a tale of corruption.
And then
there are the huge pharmaceutical conglomerates which fund ‘research’ on ABC,
while making billions out of soaring costs of chemotherapy for breast cancer. Not
to mention the pill, another established risk factor for breast cancer.
Go figure. Would
these outfits want to kill the goose who lays the golden egg?
Thirdly, the
first study showing the tobacco/cancer link was published in 1929, but it wasn’t
till 1957 that the National Cancer Institute issued the first warning. Turkeys
don’t vote for an early Christmas.
They might not be ‘top hits’ on google, but the reports from
India, China, Bangladesh, Iran, Sri Lanka and Russia, being disinterested, are also
far more credible.
No comments:
Post a Comment