In ruling that an unborn child isn’t ‘living’ for fear of creating
anomalies (Dec 20), the Supreme Court justices have invented an anomaly of their
own. Try telling a woman who’s endured the misery of miscarriage that her unborn
child of two months’ gestation wasn’t ‘living’. If the child wasn’t ‘living’,
why mourn it? Try telling the same thing to a woman who against every natural
instinct sees herself forced by circumstance to undergo an abortion. If the
child isn’t ‘living’, why go through the trauma of having it killed? Such
disregard for the truth, to say nothing of common sense, will serve only to
bring the law further into disrepute and accelerate New Zealand’s descent into
anarchy.
Julia du Fresne
No comments:
Post a Comment