SEXUAL
EXCITEMENT FOR FIVE-YEAR OLDS
If Chris Trotter thinks the Roast
Busters’ victims (How have we raised sons such as these? Nov 8) at age
13 are ‘pitiably young’, what does he think of the drones of Planned Parenthood
whose latest target, in ensuring ‘the right to explore nakedness and the body’,
is toddlers and children up to age four? Who believe information around ‘sexual
feelings (closeness, enjoyment, excitement)’ should be foisted on little ones
just starting school, and ‘first sexual experience’ and ‘orgasm’ should be
taught even before they make it to secondary?
These apparently are the World Health
Organisation’s Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe, published in 2010
with major input from Planned Parenthood, the international body of Family
Planning – and maybe, coming soon to an intermediate school, a kindergarten or
play group near you.
Julia du Fresne
Poor Mr Plod. How can the police be expected to decide
whether an unborn baby is a child (Unborn
babies and the law, A3, Nov 2) which would mean killing it is
breaking the law - or a foetus, which means it’s not? Here’s a rule of thumb:
if the baby’s wanted, it’s a person and you can’t kill it; if the baby’s
unwanted it’s a foetus and you can.
Julia du Fresne
IT’S
VERY BAD FOR YOU
Forgive me if I state the obvious, and
contradict the good Dr Stephenson for stating in an otherwise excellent column
(You’re never too old for sex, Oct 29) that ‘sex ... with a loved one
can only be a good thing’. Maybe it’s no longer obvious to most of your
readers, but Scripture states explicitly that it’s a good thing only if you’re
married. Otherwise, it’s called fornication and it’s very bad for you.
Julia du Fresne
No comments:
Post a Comment