Saturday, 26 July 2025

+LEO FALLS FOR ZELENSKY'S PROXY WAR

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.










Ukrainians evidently have had it, finally, with their war-waging, money-laundering, multi-millionaire fascist dictator Volodomyr Zelenskyy. They know he's no hero. Could someone please tell Pope Leo XIV, who seems smitten? Antipope Bergoglio made a fool of the Catholic Church by pushing the COVID potion as 'an act of love'; his successor honoured this corrupt stooge of oligarchs and bankers as his first foreign leader to the Vatican.


The Holy Father has condemned Russia for "a real imperialist invasion". But in this case Russia is far more sinned against than sinning. And Pope Leo has expressed his "closeness to martyred Ukraine—to the children, the young people."



The concilar Church, Your Holiness, is mired in heresy, sex abuse and corruption of children and young people, through retention and promotion of repulsive, anti-Christic churchmen like Cardinal 'Tucho' Fernandez, Father James Martin, your new Bishop Thomas Hennen, et al.


The business of the Church right now is surely not politicking on behalf of a proxy war, but its own cleansing, reparation and the salvation of souls.






From Matt Werner, writing for the Remnant Magazine:


Whenever our governmental officials or our national broadcast media speak about the cause of the war in Ukraine and Russia, they make the pronouncement that Russia invaded Ukraine without provocation.  But is that true? 

 

In doing so didn’t our (US - ed) government and our media speak falsehoods and lies?  Didn’t Russia embark on its limited Special Military Operation (SMO) only after having received monumental provocations from the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) over most of the last three decades?



In 1991 following the collapse of the Soviet Union U.S. Secretary of State James Baker promised Russian president Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move “one inch” closer to Russia.  NATO should have disbanded at that juncture.  The NATO alliance had banded together early in the cold war against a perceived threat from the Soviet Union.  With the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, didn’t the threat against which NATO had resolved to defend western Europe no longer exist?



But then in 1999, without any new military threats coming from Russia, didn’t NATO expand by granting membership to Poland, Slovakia and Hungary?  Russia protested.  In 2004 didn’t NATO further expand eastwards again by granting membership to the Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia bringing its war machine right up to the Russian border?

 

Since 1991 NATO has more than doubled the number of countries in its alliance.  Today NATO has 32 member countries. In 2008 at the Bucharest summit NATO declared its intention of adding Ukraine and Georgia to its membership.  Didn’t some NATO planners hope to have Ukraine join Romania and Poland creating a triad of missile launching bases minutes away from Moscow?


Might one imagine the consternation in the Kremlin as the Russian political and military leaders observed its encirclement by nearby western military bases with missiles capable of reaching Moscow?  Apparently, the U.S. political leaders and the voices in the media do not think we have provoked Russia by expanding NATO in this manner.   During this military encroachment toward Russia’s borders, the people of Russia practiced patience and self-restraint.



Zelenskyy and wife - Pope Leo XIV's first foreign leader as guest at the Vatican



In early 2014 the U.S. instigated and then executed a bloody coup which violently overthrew the popular Ukrainian president Victor Yanukovich at the Maidan Nezalezhnosty public square in downtown Kiev where several dozen men lost their lives. 

 

Yanukovich fled to Russia.  Yanukovich had favored economic cooperation with Russia rather than with the European Union which infuriated our state department and European politicians.

 

The U.S. had helped install a new government in Ukraine, one hostile towards Russians and the Russian tongue.  The Ukrainian legislature, the Verkhovna Rada, passed laws outlawing the use of the Russian language in all official governmental, educational and legal institutions.  Russian speaking Ukrainians in the eastern oblasts of Donetsk and Lugansk watched aghast as these events unfolded. 


Then in May 2014 after protesting that Maidan coup in Kiev, 44 Russian speaking Ukrainians in Odessa fled to the Trades Union Building for their safety. In hot pursuit a frenzied gang of Ukrainian neo-Nazis set the building ablaze, incinerating them all.  Ukraine refused to prosecute the arsonist murderers. Immediately thereafter the Russians in the Donbas [basin of the Don River] sought political autonomy.


After the illegitimate Maidan coup the Ukrainian military began a war against its own citizens living in Donetsk and Lugansk by sending troops and tanks to the East where they began bombarding the cities and villages of Russians who no longer wanted to belong to a country whose borders dated only to the recent year of 1991. 

 

Ukrainians protest: https://www.foxnews.com/world/ukraine-sees-sweeping-protests-over-bill-weakening-anti-corruption-agencies



Russians in the eastern oblasts, not just Donetsk and Lugansk, will tell you that Catherine the Great had annexed their lands in about 1783 Maps of Russia from the last three centuries list these eastern oblasts as belonging to Little RussiaNew Russia or South Russia depending upon which map you consult. 

 

The illegitimate post-Maidan coup Ukrainian government worked to deny the legitimate aspirations of the Russians in the Donbas by prosecuting an eight year long war upon their own citizens, all with the support of the United States government and with U.S. supplied munitions.  The Ukrainian army slaughtered more than 14,000 Russians during the eight-year siege. Does this count as provocation?


The illegitimate governments of “presidents” Petro Poroshenko and then Volodymyr Zelensky declared their intentions to have Ukraine join NATO.  Might this have understandably provoked a reaction from Russia, with whom Ukraine shares a 1,200-kilometer border?

 

Since the 2022 Russian-limited SMO, I have observed Russia show the greatest restraint in its conduct during the war.  On the other hand, I have watched Ukraine engage in many illegal or immoral deeds over the duration of this conflict.  For instance, the assassination last fall by a remotely detonated bomb killing a Russian general working to expose the extensive production of secret illegal biological weapons by Ukraine.


In June 2025 Great Britain helped the Ukrainian military to strike deeply inside Russia by bombing several airfields with resulting damage to some of Russia’s fleet of nuclear capable bombers.  International law would not condemn a retaliatory strike by Russia on the U.K. for its reckless conduct.  But saner heads prevail in the Kremlin.  Russia does not want to take the chance that hotheads in Washington or perhaps in NATO would bring us to thermonuclear Armageddon.


Didn’t Putin and Russia endure eight years of provocations from 2014-2022 before sending their army into the Donbas to come to the aid of Russian speaking Ukrainians, who were then preparing to withstand a renewed onslaught by Zelensky’s neo-Nazi conscripts and his Azov Battalion? 

 

Since then, Russia has prosecuted the war with great restraint, hoping that Ukraine and the West would open their eyes and understand that Russia will prevail in this war. Russia will never again relinquish those eastern Oblasts and Crimea.

 

Russia has the ability to absolutely flatten the country, destroy the power grid, the roads and bridges, everything.  But she does not want to do so.  She restrains herself from inflicting unnecessary suffering. But she will prevail in this conflict even if it takes many more years. 

 

Russia will not stop until she has the assurance that Ukraine will forevermore remain neutral and not become a member of NATO.  Ukraine might even cease to exist, disappearing into the history books, with portions getting returned to the five or six countries from which she was assembled prior to 1991.

 

Perhaps Russia will reclaim all her lost oblasts east of the River Dnepr.  She will restore all the old Russian names to the cities the Ukrainians have renamed.  But she will do it slowly and carefully, all the while hoping that common sense will prevail in Washington and in Western Europe.  


I understand that the U.S. has instigated this war against Russia, using the Ukrainian army as its proxies.  The Ukrainian military fights Russia to advance U.S. interests.

 

We pretend we came to defend a poor east European country against a belligerent unprovoked invasion by Russia, while knowing all along we have provoked Russia’s intervention. 

 

American Neocons hate Russia for its challenge to our global hegemony. Neoconservatives in the U.S. State Department have drawn up a plan to dismantle or dismember Russia into nine independent regions, a Balkanization, rendering her less of a threat to U.S. hegemony. 



When is NZ's Prime Minister Luxon going to realise that Zelenskyy is not a hero?


More than that, Russia also infuriates advocates of a new world order because Russia staunchly resists all LBGTQ initiatives, and all Diversity, Equity and Inclusion policies, clinging instead to theOrthodox truths and dogmas taught by Our Lord and His Church.

 

Russia will prevail in this fight because her soldiers love their country, love their Orthodox faith, and will bravely give their lives for the precious cause of saving their country, their faith and its traditions.  They will also gladly welcome back into Mother Russia all those Russians who did not ask for inclusion into the country-not-built-to-last, whose problematic borders date only to 1991.


Wasn’t the Russian/Ukrainian border drawn 500-800 kilometers too far east in 1991, which has caused a civil war between those countries since 2014? They should have made the river Dnepr as the border between the two countries. Why should the U.S. or NATO have any vital national interests concerning where that border should lie? 

 

NATO countries have an irrational fear that Russia poses a threat to them when Russia only seeks to protect Russians from the onslaught they suffered from the brutal regime in Kiev since 2014.  Russia never wanted this war.  She restrained herself for eight years.  Finally, the provocations from Kiev and the U.S., caused Russia to send her troops across the border in February 2022 to prevent further destruction in the cities of Russians living in Donetsk and Lugansk.


 

Kiev has now learned she has misplayed her hand.  Over the course of the war these past three years many other oblasts now want to rejoin Russia:  Zaporizhia, Kherson, and Dnepropetrovsk.  Maybe Mikolaiv and Odessa will be next. The Russian army will not stop until Russia has certainty that Ukraine will remain a neutral country outside of the NATO alliance. 

 

American neoconservatives have miscalculated.  This war will not defeat and dismember Russia.  Instead, she will emerge from it reconstituted and stronger.  Let’s pray to our Blessed Mother that the U.S. and NATO have the humility to admit defeat in this war with Russia.  Let’s pray we have the future wisdom to refrain from launching both conventional and nuclear weapons over territorial disputes in Eastern Europe where none of our national interests lie.https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/7863-might-russia-occupy-the-moral-high-ground?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_co



Our Lady of Kazan "The protection of Russia," tied to the apparitions at Fatima


 

Thursday, 24 July 2025

ABORTED BABIES IN YOUR WATER: BAN THE PILL

 

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.







Why didn't we think of it before now? Did we not wonder what happens to the thousands upon thousands of tiny pre-born babies flushed down the loo by women who self-medicate with the lethal medical abortion pill, mifepristone? Obviously, the dead babies - nearly 700,000 a year in the US - and placenta, blood and chemical byproducts go into our public water systems. The dead babies are up to two inches long, clogging pipes and traumatizing wastewater workers who find them trapped in treatment screens. 


As if the slaughter of our unborn children (wholesale in New Zealand now, per kind favour of Dame Jacinda Ardern's Abortion Law Act, rushed through Parliament under cover of the COVID hoax) were not evil enough in itself. The callousness of flushing them down the loo is equalled only by the stupidity of ingesting poisonous chemicals and human remains. Some would call that karma. It's actually divine vengeance. Mankind must suffer for it. 


Mass slaughter of the innocents is the apogee of the Davos Depopulation/White Replacement agenda. It started with feminism, progressed to LGBTQ and pornography, climaxed with abortion, then imported aliens (in New Zealand, Indians, Philippinos and Chinese) to replace the missing homegrown, white citizenry. Anything but white: it's How to End Whiteness 101. 


Or How To End Western civilisation. By flushing our babies down the loo.






 

The abortion pill, mifepristone, is potentially contaminating America’s tap water, the Daily Citizen recently reported. Now, recent data adds a disturbing new layer to this alarming issue.

 

A 2025 report from Liberty Counsel Action (LCA) estimates between 30 and 40 tons of aborted fetal remains – including human tissue, placenta, blood and chemical byproducts – are flushed into America’s wastewater each year.

For reference, this is equivalent to the weight of a fully loaded semi-truck.

In a Vigilant Fox broadcast, Abigail Forman, one of the report’s authors, commented:

Nearly 700,000 times a year in the US, women take abortion pills, flushing the resulting remains down toilets and into our public water systems.

Aborted fetuses, some up to two inches long, are being flushed down toilets, clogging pipes and traumatizing wastewater workers who find them trapped in treatment screens.

Employees of wastewater facilities should not be encountering such graphic remains, nor are these treatment centers equipped process human blood and tissues correctly. The LCA report notes:

Abortion providers issuing chemical abortion pills have been able to use wastewater treatment plants as their de facto medical waste facilities for decades.

While a few states separately impose burial or cremation requirements for aborted children, “most states do not specifically regulate” aborted fetal remains disposal.

Due to treatment centers’ inability to properly sanitize water contaminated by this hazardous waste, Forman added that dangerous byproducts from both aborted babies and the mifepristone drug are likely present in all forms of our tap water.

Americans across the country are using this harmful water, polluted by death and chemicals, for bathing, drinking, cooking and cleaning on a daily basis.

 


A human life lost and found in waste water

 

This issue not only jeopardizes the American people’s health and correlates with rising infertility rates, but the flushing of fetal remains into our sewer system is utterly disrespectful towards the countless babies who have been denied their right to life. The LCA report states,

Liberty Counsel Action agrees that not only is further study needed, so also is dignified disposition of human remains.

Addressing this issue should unite all Americans.

Clean drinking water and human dignity should not be controversial.

Thankfully, several have stepped up to investigate this problem. As previously reported, Senator James Lankford and Congressman Josh Brecheen have urged the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to investigate “the potential contaminant effects” of mifepristone in America’s tap water. 

More recently, however, Representative Brandon Gill and Senator Jim Banks have introduced “The Respectful Treatment of Unborn Remains Act.” According to a June 25 press release, the act would aim to:

Bar abortionists from disposing of aborted fetal remains in publicly owned water systems, including but not limited to federal, state, and locally controlled drains and pipes.

This legislation would restore dignity to the deceased unborn child and prevent health risks posed by medical waste contamination in public water reserves.

If passed, abortion providers found violating the law would face a fine and up to five years in prison. Notably, these penalties would not apply to the woman receiving the abortion.

Concerning the act, Congressman Gill commented to the Daily Wire,

Not only does abortion rob an unborn baby of their life, but abortionists further rob them of a dignified burial by carelessly discarding their fetal remains into public water systems — a disgusting and abhorrent practice.

This careless discard of human body parts signifies the depraved disregard for the sanctity of life at abortion clinics.

Beyond the moral outrage, introducing fetal remains into public water systems also poses a serious public health concern, potentially contaminating water sources.

I am proud to introduce a bill that restores some dignity after death, as part of the greater fight to protect all life from the evil of abortion.

While the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency - ed) has not commented on this issue, the new bill has received support from several pro-life groups, including Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, Priests for Life and Students for Life Action. Additionally, several House Representatives have co-sponsored the bill.

As the LCA stated in their report, the issue of water sanitation and the dignity of human life should not be controversial.

The American people deserve better than contaminated tap water.

Women deserve better than the abortion pill.

And preborn babies robbed of their right to life deserve better than being flushed down the toilet. 


https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1944154768785490074/photo/1


 

BREAKING NEWS: New White Paper: Abortion Pill Chemicals and Human Remains Entering the Water Supply


June 17, 2025

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A research paper released this week is raising an urgent national alarm over the environmental consequences of chemical abortions. The special report, published by Liberty Counsel Action, documents how an estimated 30-40 tons of hazardous medical waste, including human remains, are being flushed into the water systems.


The white paper, entitled “Abortion in Our Water, A Special Report: Chemical Home Abortions & the Disposition of Aborted Fetal Remains,” provides a comprehensive analysis regarding the environmental impact of the abortion pill (Mifepristone) and human fetal remains entering our water systems.

 

Drawing from various studies and peer-reviewed research, petitions to the EPA, government documents, interviews with water treatment experts, and proprietary modeling, the report estimates that approximately 700,000 chemical abortions occur per year.

Executive Summary: ABORTION IN OUR WATER President Trump’s Priority:

 

“Crystal Clean Water” “Crystal-clean water” has been a priority of President Donald J. Trump since day one of his first administration.

 

If We Should Not Be Flushing Baby Wipes—We Should Not Be Flushing Babies

 

In direct opposition to Trump’s stated clean water goal, our water is now being contaminated daily by chemical abortions as approximately 700,000 American women are instructed by abortion providers to dispose of their fetal remains down the toilet. 

 

Not only does such instruction fly in the face of the Environmental Protection Agency’s encouragement to only flush toilet paper, as flushing anything else (baby wipes, tampons, goldfish etc.) “. . . can damage internal plumbing, local sewer systems and septic systems,” it also violates various state medical waste laws.

 

Notably, a former EPA state spokesperson stated, “it is never acceptable to put placenta into the sewer system. Never.”

 

The FDA's Original Approval of the Abortion Pill Was Flawed In the application seeking approval for the abortion pill (mifepristone), the Population Council submitted an Environmental Assessment (EA) that concluded the impact of the drug on our environment would be minimal.

 

No actual study of the possible environmental effects was conducted. The same assessment entirely overlooked the issue of how the fetal remains would be disposed of and failed to consider relevant state laws on water quality (as well as the enormous increase in use of the drug).

 

These gross oversights amount to clear violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)and Clean Water Act (CWA).

 

Increased Use of the Pill Increases Environmental Concern

 

The vast majority of the approximately one million annual abortions that occur in the U.S. (at least 63% as of 2023) are now performed outside of a clinical setting. Students for Life of America estimates that 40+ tons of chemically both cases, without the initial ("generating") action of the abortion provider, either to use surgical instruments or to issue the chemical abortion pill, no medical waste would be generated.

 

 

Bubonic plague (black death) started by poisoning well waters with dead remains. Statues like this were erected in Switzerland and England



Argument: Pharmaceuticals have been studied and shown to be in our water, but in such low concentrations they won’t affect human health.

 

Rebuttal: Their possible effects over time have not been comprehensively studied, nor has the complex interaction of multiple pharmaceuticals and other contaminants been comprehensively studied for all possible combined effects (particularly in children).

 

Argument: Many pharmaceuticals will be removed in conventional wastewater and drinking water treatment.

 

Rebuttal: Many is not all. And we know other pharmaceuticals and potential endocrine-disrupting compounds, e.g. PFAS, even in very low doses, can be detrimental over time.

 

Argument: Advanced and/or post-treatment processes at wastewater treatmment facilities can remove pharmaceuticals.

 

Rebuttal: Most POTWs are conventional, not advanced. Furthermore: While there are advanced treatment systems that can remove up to 100 percent of certain pharmaceuticals, they face numerous limitations—for example, some have higher operational costs, and, depending on the type of advanced treatment, can lead to “the formation of toxic by-products during the oxidation of pharmaceuticals,” which raises “significant environmental safety concerns about water treatment technologies,” among others. 

 

The costs of implementing and operating the more effective systems would likely be beyond what rural communities, particularly, could afford.  Even if this is pursued, it would take decades to fully implement across the United States.

 

The U.S. government should not be risking Americans' health by continuing to allow possible exposure to mifepristone metabolites while WWTP processes are updated.  Such efforts still would not get rid of the disturbing reality that human remains (medical waste) are being processed at WWTP, which do not remove all organic waste but allow approximately 10% to enter the water supply (meaning it is highly likely human remains are entering the water supply at a molecular level).

 

Argument: Chemical abortion has been effective for decades, and this is simply a means to control women's bodies.

 

Rebuttal: This is not about a woman's ability to choose. Indeed, she could still choose a surgical abortion (which is not only safer but likely reduces the trauma women face as they are unlikely to see the human remains from the abortion). Furthermore, there remains the primary matter of the FDA’s and EPA’s negligence in failing to ensure the approval of mifepristone complied with state and local laws on water quality and medical waste (clear violations of the Clean Water Act and National Environmental Policy Act).

 

This needs to be properly addressed both to ensure it does not happen again, as well as to ensure any possible adverse effects caused by said negligent actions are properly addressed. For more information, visit: AbortionInOurWater.org 



 

Madonna and Child with an Angel (Sandro Botticelli)




O Sorrowful Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us who have recourse to thee.