To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X.
 |
 |
| https://citizengo.org/en-row/fr/16836-doha-summit--stop-the-un-s-agenda--- |
 |
| Italy revolts against Digital ID |
Rowan Dean: Digital ID marks the end of democracy
Australian broadcaster Rowan Dean has issued a stark warning. The global push toward digital identification systems is not a step forward for convenience or security, but a leap into what he calls “the end of democracy as we know it.”
Speaking on Sky News Australia, Dean outlined his belief that digital IDs are a gateway to total government control, drawing parallels to China’s social credit system and warning of a future where every aspect of daily life is monitored, restricted and dictated by bureaucrats, politicians, and corporate elites.
“A digital ID is the end of democracy as we know it,” Dean began. “It’s an irreversible step into a dystopian future, first with no cash, only digital currency controlled by governments, and eventually the ability for authorities to control and restrict every single aspect of your life.”
 |
Dean referred to material published by the World Economic Forum (WEF), which illustrates how a digital identity could become central to all areas of life, from financial services and travel to healthcare, food access, and social media. He warned that what looks like a framework for convenience is in fact the foundation for surveillance and control on a global scale.
“Digital ID schemes potentially give absolute powers of surveillance and control over every aspect of your life to unelected bureaucrats, unscrupulous politicians and greedy corporations,” Dean said. “If you don’t think future authoritarian governments won’t use these powers ruthlessly, then you must have been fast asleep during COVID.”
Dean referenced the use of QR codes and vaccine mandates during the pandemic as evidence of how easily governments can expand and enforce intrusive technologies under the banner of safety.
According to a LifeSite News opinion piece he cited (see below - ed), the move toward digital identity systems has “nothing to do with curbing illegal immigration, securing jobs, or protecting youth online”. Instead, Dean said, it represents the “linchpin of a global surveillance state” being advanced by organisations like the United Nations.
Whistleblower and former Silicon Valley technologist Aman Jabi also featured in Dean’s report, describing how social recognition technology could soon be used to “unlock your digital identity”, turning basic access to daily services into a privilege contingent on compliance.
“The plan,” Jabi warned, “is to lock up humanity in smart cities, a superset of the so-called 15-minute city, where water management means rationing, traffic monitoring means limited mobility, and energy conservation means rationed heat, electricity and fuel.”
 |
Dean noted that UK Labour leader Keir Starmer is already pursuing a mandatory digital ID system under the guise of tackling immigration issues, and he predicted similar efforts could soon appear in Australia.
He also criticised the growing push to tie digital identification to age verification for social media use, calling it a clever way to normalise the system under the pretext of “protecting children.”
“What better way to trick the public into getting a digital ID than linking it to restricting under-16s from social media?” Dean asked. “Suddenly it’s ‘for the kids’, and before you know it, facial recognition and biometric surveillance are part of everyday life.”
As Australia prepares to announce its own policy on age restrictions for under-16s online, Dean warned viewers to listen carefully for key terms like “digital identification,” “biometrics,” and “facial recognition.”
“If you hear those words, you’ll know the fix is in,” he concluded. “Surrender to a digital ID, and you surrender your children’s freedom and your own.” Rowan Dean: Digital ID marks the end of democracy
 |
The lowdown in detail from Lifesitenews:
Digital ID and biometrical facial scans for online age verification are quickly becoming passports to the internet thanks to legislation and big tech policy changes.
As governments begin enforcing age identity checks, Big Tech and social media companies are following suit with sweeping updates affecting all users in all parts of the globe.
In September 2018 the World Economic Forum (WEF) published a report stating that digital identity will determine your level of access to information.
Fast-forward seven years, and this is has become a reality as digital IDs and biometric facial scanning become the new normal for passing internet checkpoints.
“This digital identity determines what products, services and information we can access – or, conversely, what is closed off to us.” — WEF, Identity in a Digital World: A new chapter in the social contract, September 2018
The new laws and policies come under the guise of “child safety,” but when looked at through a different lens, the message can be easily inverted to mean “adult endangerment” as everyone’s speech and access to information will be dependent upon some form of digital ID for accessing search engines and social media.
Whether through a government mandate or through the fusion of corporation and state via public-private partnerships, the years-long agenda to rollout internet passports is steaming ahead.
Here, we take a look at legislation coming from the European Union (EU), the U.K., Australia, and the U.S., as well as big tech policies being implemented and how they will impact all of society.
The EU Digital Services Act
https://twitter.com/i/status/1953109476694786073The European Commission is in the process of testing an age verification app prototype that is built upon the EU Digital Identity Wallet framework.
Five nations have agreed to be guinea pigs for this new experiment:
- Denmark
- France
- Greece
- Italy
- Spain
The European Commission website is awash with ways this type of internet passport will protect children.
The announcement includes quotes like: “Making sure our children and young people are safe online is of paramount importance,” and “Children deserve a safe digital childhood,” and “They [guidelines] will ensure that children and young people can continue to enjoy the opportunities the online world.”
But beneath it all, adults will be equally impacted, and this is yet another backdoor or Trojan Horse for coercive biometric surveillance and digital identity adoption for all.
“Built upon the robust European Digital Identity Wallet framework, this user-friendly and privacy-preserving age verification solution enables individuals to demonstrate their eligibility for age-restricted online services, such as those restricted to adults, without disclosing more personal information than absolutely necessary.” — European Commission, EU Age Verification Solution, July 2025
“A core objective of this initiative is to deliver a consistent, secure, privacy-preserving and user-friendly age verification experience that can be easily integrated into a wide variety of digital services throughout the European Union.
The modular architecture and adherence to open standards not only ensure interoperability between national systems, but also allow online service providers to adapt the solution to their own technical and regulatory environments.” — European Commission, EU Age Verification Solution, July 2025.
According to the EC:
The age verification blueprint […] lays the groundwork for broader deployment of age-appropriate based services in the future and is built on the same technical specifications as the European Digital Identity Wallets (eID) that are to be rolled out before the end of 2026.
This ensures compatibility between the two and enables the integration of the age verification functionality in the future eID Wallets.
This is not just about children. It’s getting everybody onboard with digital ID, continuous facial recognition monitoring, and internet passports.
This digital ID and internet passport rollout is part of the EU Digital Services Act (DSA).
Recently, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee obtained documents from the European Commission exposing the DSA as a tool for censorship, where a sentence like “We need to take back our country” is considered to be “illegal hate speech.”
If platforms don’t comply with censorship recommendations from EC-approved NGOs and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), then the platforms can get fined up to 6 percent of their global earnings:
The DSA is being used to censor political speech, including humor and satire. Documents produced to the Committee under subpoena show that European censors target core political speech that is neither harmful nor illegal, attempting to stifle debate on topics such as immigration and the environment.
READ: Trump says he’s spoken to China’s Xi Jinping about imprisoned Catholic Jimmy Lai
On May 7, 2025, the EC held a workshop with the biggest names in tech, NGOs, and CSOs called the “DSA Multi-Stakeholder Workshop on Systemic Risks and their Mitigation.”
One participant, Access Now, which ironically claims to advocate freedom of expression while promoting digital identification systems, remarked that “everything that can be considered as hateful and harmful” should be removed from platforms.
With the European Commission completely committed to enforcing internet passports, digital ID, and censorship, the U.K. is following suit.
The UK Online Safety Act
With the enactment of the Online Safety Act (OSA), which also claims to protect children, everyone must submit to an internet passport check when accessing social media and other large user-to-user services, which the bill refers to as Category 1 services.
Like with the EU, we see that this is not aimed at just allegedly protecting children – this is also aimed at adults.
The bill uses Orwellian doublespeak with phrases like “Adults will have more control over the content they see,” which actually means that adults will see what the algorithms nudge them to see.
They will be nudged toward content from “verified users” – the ones who sign up for digital ID schemes or give up their biometrics through facial scans for the internet passport check:
Adult users of such [Category 1] services will be able to verify their identity and access tools which enable them to reduce the likelihood that they see content from non-verified users and prevent non-verified users from interacting with their content. This will help stop anonymous trolls from contacting them.
According to the User identity verification section of the OSA:
- A provider of a Category 1 service must offer all adult users of the service the option to verify their identity (if identity verification is not required for access to the service).
- The verification process may be of any kind (and in particular, it need not require documentation to be provided).
Here we see that even if an identity check isn’t required, it still must be offered.
And if the age check doesn’t require documentation, the most obvious alternative is continuous facial scanning, which acts like a living digital ID where your image is always up-to-date in real-time.
Any government may say that the data collected will be erased and that privacy will be secured, but how long will those assurances last when a new regime is in power or when a new emergency is declared?
“Category 1 services will also need to proactively offer adult users optional tools, at the first opportunity, to help them reduce the likelihood that they will encounter certain types of legal content.” — U.K. Government, Online Safety Act, July 2025.
WATCH: How to remain hopeful in the face of a disintegrating world
On the censorship front, the OSA states that “Services will be required to take steps to remove illegal disinformation content if they become aware of it on their services,” and these services will also need to reduce the likelihood that adults will see “certain types of legal content” – like self-harm.
But definitions can be vague. Repercussions sweeping.
Criticizing climate change policies like net zero, or questioning public health authorities could all be considered forms of self-harm.
After all, a threat to the planet is a threat to the self, and questioning public health authorities is the same as questioning science itself, which is dangerous to everyone.
Once digital ID and other forms of internet passports are in place, the move toward censorship becomes that much easier.
Now let’s look to Australia’s requirements for internet passport checkpoints.
The Australian Online Safety Act
Australia’s Online Safety Act claims to be all about protecting children, but yet again, we see it is about casting a digital dragnet over everyone.
When the section for social media minimum age was introduced, Senator Malcolm Roberts warned in 2024 that the continuous facial recognition scanning would cover adults as well as children and that the cameras would always be watching.
“The issue is not who signs in to social media; the issue is who’s using the account,” said Roberts. “This requires the device camera to always be on to check the user’s image against their digital ID to prevent, for instance, someone’s younger siblings from taking over the session.”
Roberts also warned that the constant surveillance coming out of the OSA could lead to censorship under the guise of combatting so-called misinformation and disinformation.
Conversation
