Monday, 2 March 2026

LEO MAKES INFAMOUS PENA PARRA A NUNCIO


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 



 Leo with his new Apostolic Nuncio to Italy,  Archbishop Edgar Archbishop Peña Parra






Catholics seem eager to talk about the Epstein files, to join in salacious enjoyment of "Randy Andy" and his downfall. But isn't a Catholic supposed to say "there but for the grace of God go I"?  


Talk about the tip of the proverbial. An entire political class is keeping Epstein Files' redactions secret because their release could bring down the globalist elite - and an entire clerical class are hiding their intel on the Lavender Mafia, to prevent exposure of the conciliar, synodal, Novus Ordo edifice now pretending to be the Catholic Church.  


It's not as if the Vatican isn't already discredited - by decades of deliberate infiltration by corrupt fifth columnists liable to blackmail, with the craven complicity of the hierarchy; by billions of lay Catholics' moneys spent in settlements for clergy sex abuse; by grave accusations that Francis/Bergoglio personally protected a string of vile sex criminals which in the context of any other church leader would certainly have forced a resignation. 


And with the appointment of Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra as Apostolic Nuncio to Italy, Leo/Prevost is following the Francis trajectory. The conciliar hierarchy is now a lobby of perverted heretics. They took decades to get the predator McCarrick, and barely a month to excommunicate Archbishop Vigano for calling them out.


Sodomy is a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance, especially when it preys on the young. As such, it should be hated: Christian charity demands that we hate wickedness just as we love goodness.


 

Fr. Grassi, Fr Inzoli, Bishop Zanchetta, Cardinal McCarrick, Fr. Marko Rupnik


From excommunicated whistleblower Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano:


The rumored [now confirmed - ed] appointment of Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra, currently Substitute for General Affairs at the Secretarat of State, as the new Apostolic Nuncio to Italy is disconcerting and scandalous. 


At a time when the network of crime and corruption revealed by Jeffrey Epstein’s files shows the constant presence of abusers who can be blackmailed for their heinous crimes, Prevost’s Vatican has no intention of deviating from Bergoglio’s line, based precisely on the cover-up and blackmailability of his corrupt collaborators.



 

Since 2002, in my capacity as Delegate for Pontifical Representations, I have reported to the Superiors of the Secretariat of State the crimes in which Edgar Peña Parra was involved, in particular the abuse of two minor seminarians and the violent death of two homosexuals.

 

The abuse of the two young seminarians was confirmed following my further investigations by the then rector of the Major Seminary of Maracaibo, Rev. Enrique Perez, and by a committee of lay people who sent a substantial dossier on the matter to the Secretariat of State.

 

My urgent reports multiplied in the following years but went unheeded. In 2011, Peña Parra was ordained bishop, promoted to archbishop and apostolic nuncio, when the current Secretary of State Pietro Parolin was the nuncio right there in Venezuela.

 

Throughout all these years, both Parolin and the various Substitutes have been responsible for covering up the dossier on Peña Parra, which is kept in the archives of the Nunciature in Caracas and in those of the Secretariat of State.

 

In my Memorial of August 22, 2018, I once again reported in detail the whole story of Peña Parra, who in the meantime had been promoted by Bergoglio to the high office of Substitute of the Secretariat of State.

 

Promoting him now to Apostolic Nuncio in Italy would mean ratifying the protection that this shameful character has enjoyed so far, renewing the outrage to his victims who are still waiting for justice.

 

How does Leo intend to proceed?

 

What message will he send to the perverts and corrupt individuals inside and outside the Roman Curia if he decides to promote Peña Parra, after dozens of similar promotions by his predecessor Bergoglio? Peña Parra must be tried, removed from all positions, and sentenced to the most severe punishment, in order to send a true signal of change that is not limited to empty words.

 

The Italian government, for its part, must unequivocally reject this appointment by refusing to agree. Accepting Peña Parra’s nomination as Apostolic Nuncio would make the Italian government complicit with those who shamefully continue to cover up his crimes with an unworthy promotion.Viganò on Scandalous Rumored Appointment of Peña Parra

 




From #UnmaskTheEmpire, on X:

The dossier never sleeps.
It thickens in the Vatican vaults while the wolves promote their own. McCarrick was no lone predator. He was the permitted rot, the living blackmail key handed from Benedict's quiet cell straight into Francis's open palm. Viganò spoke the words in 2013: “a dossier this thick.” The Holy Father smiled, nodded, then elevated the very network that shielded the monster.
Coincidence? No.
Protocol.
The same protocol now anoints Peña Parra accused since 2002 of seminary abuses and darker ends to Nuncio in Italy. A promotion not despite the files, but because of them.

 

Blackmailable men make loyal lieutenants when the Empire needs the Church to kneel before Davos, Agenda 2030, and the transhuman creed.
Viganò saw the fusion: deep church mirroring deep state. Not accident. Design.
Epstein's island was the profane altar; Rome's corridors the sacred one. Same masters, dual levers: sex, money, silence to bend the Bride into serving Antichrist's blueprint.
They excommunicated the whistleblower in 2024 to silence the last Athanasius.
Exsurge Domine.






 

 

From Gene Thomas Gomulka: 



EPSTEIN & HIS COLLABORATORS: COULD LEO & THE CATHOLIC HIERARCHY BE WORSE?


Why Pope Leo continues to cover up abuse



In order to understand the reason behind the failure of Church officials to correct the problem of sexual abuse and their subsequent cover-ups of that abuse, one has to realize that the genesis of the problem lies within the infiltrated structures of the Catholic Church.

 

That is to say, most of the predator priests who abused, raped, and sodomized countless children, the majority of whom were teenage boys, were themselves victims of prior predation. In my decades of work with clerical sexual abuse cases, I have yet to meet and interview one predator priest who had not been sexually abused himself in his former days in priestly formation.

 

This explains both why they in turn abuse young people, and why Church officials have consistently covered up that abuse.


Let’s take the example of one priest whom we will call “Bill,” and one bishop whom we will call “Leo.”

 

 

Bill went to a high school seminary when he was 13 years old, where he was groomed and introduced to gay sex by a faculty member who purported to be a caring mentor. Like most such victims, Bill did not want to tell his parents how he had developed a homosexual orientation, which often happens to boys who are abused during their period of psychosexual development and prior to their ever having had an emotional or physical relationship with a woman.

 

Instead of returning home, by staying in the seminary and getting ordained, Bill’s family and friends would never discover that he, like many abuse victims, suffers from same-sex attraction.

 

Because Bill looked upon his 12 years of seminary sexual experiences with priests and seminarians as forms of love and friendship, he later, as a priest, engaged in the same behavior with boys in his parish.

 

When one of those boys reported his predations to Father Bill’s bishop, Bishop Leo, the bishop sent Bill away for “treatment” and arranged for an out-of-court settlement with the victim. Later, Bishop Leo assigned Father Bill to another parish, just like countless homosexual priests are reassigned after getting caught using the gay Grindr hook-up app.


While this may explain why many priests abuse teenage boys, like they themselves were abused as teenagers, why is it that most bishops, like our Bishop Leo in the case above, cover up abuse instead of removing predators permanently from the priesthood?

 

The answer is that insofar as over 80% of U.S. bishops, like the pope and Vatican officials, are thought to be closeted homosexuals, they can empathize with priests like Father Bill because they themselves not only suffer from same-sex attraction, but almost all of them engaged in homosexual acts before and after their ordination.

 

 

Pope Francis notified, put on trial, and excommunicated Abp. Vigano in less than 30 days. But the nun-raping artist Fr Rupnik SJ gets years of tolerance and his art commissioned for Vatican projects



One can’t help but notice that the excommunication decree of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò was suspiciously timed, occurring shortly after the Archbishop accused Pope Francis of having abused novices when he was the Master of Novices at the Jesuit novitiate in Argentina.


 



 

What is the likelihood, for instance, that Robert Prevost, who left his family in Chicago and went to study at an Augustinian high school seminary in Michigan, may have been groomed and abused like Bill? It is worth noting that the Catholic seminary Prevost attended had housed a notorious predatory priest faculty member, Father Nelson Daniel Rupp.

 

And if in fact Prevost was groomed, might it explain why he continues to cover up the reported satanic abuse of Lisa Roers by Omaha Father Dennis Hanneman, plus over 160 bishops credibly accused of abusing children and vulnerable adults?

 

Most sex abuse victims’ advocates, like the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) who filed a Vos Estis complaint against Pope Leo before his election, believe that Pope Leo is a part of the problem and not the solution when it comes to clerical sexual predation and homosexual misconduct in the Catholic Church.

 

Consider, most recently, how the Holy See has scandalously asked Italy to approve Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra, the current Substitute for General Affairs at the Secretariat of State (i.e., the number two authority in the Secretariat), as the new Apostolic Nuncio to Italy.


 

John Paul II promoted McCarrick despite knowing the abuse allegations

 

In 2002, Peña Parra was reported in Venezuela for abusing two minor seminarians and being involved in the violent death of two homosexuals. This abuse was confirmed by the then rector of the Major Seminary of Maracaibo, Rev. Enrique Perez, where the abuse allegedly took place, and by a committee of lay people who sent a substantial dossier on the matter to the Secretariat of State.

 

The fact that Leo is promoting a number of prelates accused of engaging in and covering up abuse would lead one to believe that he himself was abused during his 12 years of formation in the Augustinian Order.

 

With respect to the case of Lisa Roers, about which I have written frequently, I urge the good laity of the Archdiocese of Omaha to follow the example of Catholics in the Buffalo Diocese who protested in front of the Chancery Office calling for the resignation of Bishop Richard Malone for covering up abuse, and the Catholics of the Richmond Diocese who protested before the Cathedral and in front of the Vatican Embassy in Washington, D.C. calling for Bishop Barry Knestout’s removal for his unjust suspension of Father Mark White - a priest who bravely spoke out against Church officials who were covering up clerical sexual predation. There is a video documenting Lisa Roers’ case entitled, The Prayer of the Prey, which I urge the Omaha faithful to watch.

 

With respect to what I firmly believe is the number one problem facing the Catholic Church today, the following remark of the great Saint Catherine of Siena, which has been making the rounds recently in the awakened part of the Catholic media, is more than timely and speaks for itself:

 

“We have had enough exhortations to be silent. Cry out with a thousand tongues. I see the world is rotten because of silence….Speak the truth in a million voices. It is silence that kills.”


 




St Catherine of Siena, please pray for the Church  



Saturday, 28 February 2026

CARDINALS WILL IGNORE ANTIPOPE DEBATE; CATHOLICS WON'T


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 










 At last. The possibility that horrifies most Catholics (and the conviction that brings the remainder to their knees) that the two men most recently called 'the pope' - Francis and Leo - are nothing of the sort but in fact antipopes, has been very publicly acknowledged. John-Henry Westen of LifeSiteNews is petitioning the cardinalate to investigate. 



It's not as if the cardinals will beat their collective breast, repent of their silence and complicity in the Vatican regime and surrender their sinecures for the sake of truth. No. The value of Westen's invitation to all Catholics to sign lies in the choice made: sign, for Christ and His Church, or don't and side with error and apostasy.



The laws of the Church exist only to ensure the salvation of souls. But Jorge Bergoglio, illegally elected, manipulated his faux pontificate to wreak untold spiritual havoc and Robert Prevost (elected on the third ballot so how many of his cardinal-electors will want to investigate him?) has sworn to continue his predecessor's program. Neither Bergoglio nor Prevost has any validity and neither do their appointments - which renders merely academic any question of excommunication for the Society of St Pius X.



1n 1846 at La Salette, the Blessed Virgin Mary prophesied "two worm-ridden popes", and many believe Bergoglio and Prevost fill that bill. However, IF the cardinals investigate, and IF they find Bergoglio and Prevost to be truly popes, the Church is not competent to judge them: no man can judge the Roman pontiff. If on the other hand they were found to have denied Church teaching and were declared formal heretics, they ipso facto would lose faith and office.



And if they were declared antipopes, who, in a conciliar, synodal, apostate Church, could deliver justice? "We have not here but 5 loaves and 2 fishes..." (Mt 14:16). In the remnant of faithful clergy still inside the Barque of Peter, the Society of St Pius X springs to mind. 





self-explanatory



From John-Henry Westen:


There is a clear and definite break in the papal line after Pope Benedict XVI. Whereas previous popes may have led grievously sinful lives, they didn’t alter Church teaching in official documents. With Francis all that changed.

 

Let’s ignore the Pachamama idolatry of Francis and Leo’s allowance of the LGBT pilgrimage into St. Peter’s Basilica – which Bishop Schneider saw as the abomination of desolation entering the Holy Place, which Christ mentioned as a sign of the end times in Matthew 24.

 

Let’s ignore Francis saying all religions are pathways to God and Leo telling the Anglicans with their homosexual clergy and their female archbishops, “We are already one.”

 

READ: John-Henry Westen: An open letter to Cardinal Sarah on the SSPX

 

Let’s ignore Francis and Leo both giving audiences to the world’s most notorious homosexuality-promoting priest, Fr. James Martin.

 

Let’s ignore the Vatican-China deal struck under Francis and upheld under Leo where the Chinese Communist Party is able to name bishops, and the underground Church and her bishops are persecuted.

 

Let’s ignore Pope Leo’s appointment of many bishops who support women’s ordination and celebrate LGBT pride Masses.

 

Let’s focus only on official teaching documents which are contrary to the faith.

 


An antipope enabling his successor


Are we now to believe in blessings for homosexual couples as Fiducia Supplicans explicitly encourages? The spirit of Fiducia Supplicans is amply demonstrated by both Francis and Leo with their support for James Martin and his embrace of homosexuality.

 

Are we now to believe, as the revised Catechism under Francis teaches, that “the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person”? Believe that even when it flatly contradicts the witness of Sacred Scripture, St. Thomas Aquinas, Pope Pius XII, and the unbroken tradition that affirmed its legitimacy?

 

But of course, Pope Leo upholds it as he just told the world, “Someone who says I’m against abortion but says I’m in favor of the death penalty is not really pro-life.”

 

Must we now hold that divorced and remarried couples, without annulment or a commitment to continence, can under some circumstances be admitted to Holy Communion, as Amoris Laetitia and the Acta Apostolicae Sedis proclaim as official magisterium?

 

Do you affirm that the Novus Ordo is the sole legitimate expression of the Roman Rite, endorsing the severe restrictions on the Latin Mass as decreed in Traditionis Custodes, the subsequent rescript, and rigorously enforced under Leo?

 

And finally, are we now to deprive Our Lady – the Mother of God – of her titles of Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces, both proclaimed by saints and popes, as the document promulgated under Leo has demanded of us?

 






Has not Jesus sent His holy Mother to warn us of the apostasy? Did not Our Lady of La Salette – an approved apparition – tell us that “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of Anti-Christ”? Our Lady of La Salette also told us there would be “two worm-ridden popes.”

 

READ: Pope Leo is pushing the synodal error that process trumps truth

 

The famous stigmatist in France [presumably Marie-Julie Jahenny - ed] in the same century as La Salette, similarly prophesied that there would be “two successive anti-popes.”

 

And if the “private revelation” is a little too much for you, how about the public revelation in the Bible?

 

Christ Himself warned us “Many false prophets will arise and lead many astray.” (Matthew 24:11)

 

The first pope, St. Peter, warns us of “false teachers among you” who will “secretly introduce destructive heresies.” (2 Peter 2:1–2)

 

St. Luke warns similarly in Acts (20:29–30) “savage wolves will come in among you… even from your own number…”


 

 

Bishop Gaspard Béby Gnéba of Man Diocese, demoted by 'Pope Leo' for asking laity to report priests leading unchaste lives


The Catechism (CCC 675-677) describes a “final trial” that “will shake the faith,” a “religious deception” at the price of “apostasy,” and identifies the “supreme religious deception” as that of the Antichrist.

 

Pope St. John Paul II himself warned us of this 50 years ago in 1976 when he spoke (as Cardinal Wojtyła) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:

 

“We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think that wide circles of the American society or wide circles of the Christian community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the anti-Gospel.

 

This confrontation lies within the plans of divine Providence; it is trial which the whole Church… must take up.” https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/petition-to-cardinals-cant-we-consider-the-possibility-that-francis-and-leo-are-anti-popes/


John-Henry is the co-founder and CEO of LifeSiteNews.com. He and his wife Dianne have eight children and they live in the Ottawa Valley in Ontario, Canada.  

He has spoken at conferences and retreats, and appeared on radio and television throughout the world. John-Henry founded the Rome Life Forum, an annual strategy meeting for life, faith and family leaders worldwide. He is a board member of the John Paul II Academy for Human Life and the Family. He is a consultant to Canada’s largest pro-life organization Campaign Life Coalition, and serves on the executive of the Ontario branch of the organization. He has run three times for political office in the province of Ontario representing the Family Coalition Party.

John-Henry earned an MA from the University of Toronto in School and Child Clinical Psychology and an Honours BA from York University in Psychology.