 |
| Robert Prevost ('Pope Leo XIV') at Castelgandolfo for his "Mass of Creation", wearing Bergoglio's satanic Bernardin cross |
 |
| Jorge Bergoglio displays the cross he inherited from Cardinal Joseph Bernardin |
 |
| Bishop Michael Gielen at his Episcopal Ordination kitted out in a lei and what looks very like the satanic pectoral cross of Joseph Cardinal Bernardin |
Jorge Mario Bergoglio's successor and protege, Chicagoan Robert Prevost (aka Pope Leo XIV) is quite simply Bergoglio Mk II. He can be identified as such not only by his advancement of the preposterous, non-Catholic, heretical Modernist agenda of his predecessor, but by wearing the satanic pectoral cross of the infamous Joseph Cardinal Bernardin, also of Chicago, which Prevost inherited from Bergoglio. And lo and behold, looks like Bishop Michael Gielen of Christchurch, New Zealand, wears it too.
You'd think butter wouldn't melt in his mouth. But in July 2024 baby-faced Bishop Gielen cancelled the priestly faculties of NZ's first and only home-grown, traditional order, the Transalpine Redemptorists (FSSR), expelled them from his diocese and called in the Bergoglian Vatican to back him up.
 |
| Idolatry in the Bergoglian Vatican |
In the last decade of Malachi Martin's life (he died in 1999) I became a personal friend of his. In the section headed "1963" in the Prologue of Windswept House, we read that this shocking ceremony, enthroning "the Fallen Archangel Lucifer" in the Chapel of St. Paul, took place on June 29, 1963, the Feast of SS. Peter and Paul, the eve of the coronation of the newly elected Pope Paul VI.
It celebrated gloatingly the long-prepared-for arrival of a pope more open to liberal changes than any of his predecessors.
This blasphemous act of devilry coordinated with a corresponding ceremony on the American side of the Atlantic one day later. It took place the night after Paul's VI's coronation in St. Peter's Square on the afternoon of Sunday, June 30. Malachi told me it was indeed carried out in the Chapel of St. Paul, as Windswept House (Martin's celebrated 'factional' book - ed) says, and began at midnight on the night of June 30 / July 1, 1963.Fr. Martin also told me the Satanic act became known because one of its participants repented a decade or so later on his deathbed and confessed this grave sin. The Roman priest hearing his confession told him he had a grave obligation to allow this shocking sacrilege to be made known to the Supreme Pontiff, in order for a re-consecration of the Pauline Chapel to be made.
Accordingly, he told the penitent he could not absolve him unless the latter gave him permission to make this shocking event known to higher ecclesial authority. The penitent did so, and Fr. Martin told me he later learned the whole story through his Vatican connections. Hopefully, there was a re-consecration of the chapel; but if so it would of course have been carried out in strict secrecy in order to avoid scandal.Malachi Martin was telling me what he believed to be the truth about the Luciferian Enthronement, the date on which it historically took place, and the way he came to know about it. For I find it hard to imagine him making a Mass intention part of a conscious lie that he had fabricated. https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/5379-the-1963-vatican-enthronement-of-lucifer-a-windswept-house-update
 |
In 2001 Fr Amorth said that "the Holy Spirit... governs the Church: the gates of hell shall not prevail. Despite the defections. And despite the betrayals. Of course, the devil can win some battles, even important ones. But he can never win the war.".
 |
| Bishop José Correia da Silva with the sealed 3rd Secret in 1948 |
 |
 |
From a Council convened to throw light on the beauty and profundity of the Christian mystery by presenting the Church as the spouse of Christ, according to the beautiful words of the same Pope John XXIII, so many innovations were born that they appear to constitute a true internal revolution. (Silvio Oddi, Il Tenero Mastino di Dio, Rome: Progetto Museali Editore, 1995, p. 217-218).
In April of this year Dr. Josef Seifert, regarded as one of the greatest living Catholic philosophers, founding Rector of the International Academy of Philosopher & friend of John Paul II, pleaded before the papal conclave, with the Cardinals: INVESTIGATE FRANCIS' HERESIES, VALIDITY BEFORE THE CONCLAVE.."If Francis is found guilty of heresy or apostasy, then: - His cardinal appointments would be invalid."
St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:
“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
Almighty God permitted the Church to be stricken with the disobedience and destruction of Vatican II as punishment for the covenant breaking by Roncalli.
 |
| Bergoglio's differing versions of the Bernardin satanic cross* |
The strange pectoral cross of the Bishops of Rome
Above left, you see the pectoral cross of Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio when he was Archbishop of Buenos Aires; at right, his cross after he was elected Pope or Bishop of Rome, as he insists on being called. Several things are strange about these crosses that invite speculation:
1. It is not uncommon for religious authorities to leave off the image of Our Lord Crucified on their pectoral crosses. However, even when they do so, implicitly it is clear that their crosses symbolize the Crucified Christ, the Redeemer who by His death canceled the guilt of Original Sin and re-opened the road of salvation. Further, the fact that those prelates wear their crosses on their chests, close to their hearts, means that they are proud disciples of the Crucified, ready to shed their blood for Him.
The cross of Pope Bergoglio makes a point of denying this truth. On his cross he pictures the figure of the Good Shepherd, as if he were saying, "I do not believe in Original Sin and, therefore, there was no redemption from it." This would correspond to the progressisivt theory that pretends Original Sin was a myth invented by the Church to explain a primitive stage of mankind in the universal evolution.
2. The shape of the cross is not that of a traditional cross. The crossing of the two beams is not defined, but spread out. It does not look like a symbol of the torment He suffered, but a simple metal plaque with a sculpture. Again, it sends the message that Pope Francis is not comfortable with being a representative of Our Lord Crucified.
3. On the plaque a dove representing the Holy Spirit is also shown descending from heaven over the flock and the Good Shepherd. One does not find any mention in Scripture of a scene where the Holy Spirit comes down directly over the flock. More likely it is an allusion to the Protestant-Pentecostal theory that claims God does not need the Catholic Hierarchy, but gives His orientation to the flock by a direct action of the Holy Spirit.
No need to say that it also implicitly denies the role of the Pope, who according to Catholic Faith, is the Vicar of Christ on earth, who is the one called to govern and teach the flock.
4. The metal of the cross is a cheap one. The different colors of the two crosses suggest that Bergoglio has more than one cross with the same symbols in different metals. His cross as a cardinal, at left, looks like a blend of brass; the second one he wears as Pope, at right, looks like either a blend of iron or pewter.
In both cases, what is clear is his rejection of the gold and precious stones that normally are used for pectoral crosses. It is a symbolic affirmation that the Church must not be rich. This is part of the miserablist thesis affirming that, after the Church left the Catacombs, she wrongly imitated the world as she bestowed on her dignitaries precious symbols of their missions. By using this cross Pope Francis symbolically affirms that he wants to wipe out this conception and return to the poverty of the times of the Catacombs, before the Church took on these "sins."
This is not a novel or original position. Throughout the History of the Church heretics of diverse origins defended precisely the same thesis. They include the Manicheans in the third century, Mazdah in Persia and the followers of Paulicanism in Armenia in the sixth; Bishop Claudius of Turin and Bishop Agobard of Lyons in the ninth.
Multiple Gnostic sects burgeoned in the Middle Ages, such as the Friends of God in Byzantium, the Dragovitsna church in Bulgaria, both predecessors of the Cathar movement. One of the Cathar branches was called the Poor Men of Lyons, founded by Peter Waldo, which generated the Waldensians and the Albigensians.
The Cathar current defending a Miserablist Church also included movements like the Communiati, the penitential order of the Umiliati, the Patarini, the Apostolic Brethren and the Fraticelli, who enjoyed the support of Michael of Cesana and William of Occam. Many sects that preceded the Pseudo-Reformation are also included in this current, such as the followers of Wycliffe in England, Jan Hus in Bohemia, Savonarola and Campanella in Italy, and Luther and Thomas Munzer in Germany.
These are some of the heretics who defended the same thing that Progressivism upholds regarding the riches of the Church. Now, Pope Francis brings these ideas to center stage, after the way was prepared by the other conciliar Popes. Thus, a completely different face for the Church is starting to be shaped.
The original crosses, of which Bernardin was given one, were sterling silver, about 4 inch in height. Made by the silver smith Antonio Vedele of Genoa either in the late 1950s or very early
'60s. Francis' cross is either one of the originals (from memory thirteen were cast originally). Bergoglio's cross which he wore in Argentina may have been cast later from the same mold. However, sterling silver oxidizes and changes colour so both could be the same cross, just someone cleaned the 'papal' one.
