EPSTEIN WAS MOSSAD & TRUMP'S PROTECTING ISRAEL

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address,  FB Messenger or X. And as there's reason to believe this page is now censored, please feel free to repost or share.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre comments on the release of the Epstein files ...

You might have shied away from the Epstein Client List story - paedophilia and blackmail don't make for nice night time reading. But not-so-hidden dimensions now emerge in the sordid tale of the Jew boy sacked for flirting with female students who landed a sinecure in banking, a career in procuring teenage girls, private jets and a Carribean island, who was finally convicted for sex trafficking and died by hanging, in prison.

Jeffrey Epstein was Mossad. Don't say that out loud - it's "anti-semitic". But working for Israeli Intel would explain Epstein's enormous wealth, would it not? It's only too credible that politicians, bureaucrats, celebrities and media got trapped in a honeypot operation gathering kompromat for Israel to extort money and bombs for genocide in Gaza and domination of the Middle East.

If the list exists, why wasn't it released by the Democrats? Why isn't it released now by Donald Trump? Because Israel is being protected. The "leader of the free world" is letting this untrammeled depravity go unpunished because the messianic madman Netanyahu, who Jeffrey Sachs says ran American foreign policy for 20 years and cost the US trillions of dollars, is intent on an authoritian Zionist State and rebuilding the Third Temple of Jerusalem.

If releasing an "Epstein List"would bring down the governments of the US, UK and their "most sacred ally", wealthy political figures and certain companies whose leaders are involved, then so be it.

Let justice be served.

Trump and Epstein with teenage victims

From Eric Sammons,  writing for Crisis Magazine:

I was never much of a conspiracy theorist. Sure, I heard the speculations (we didn’t land on the moon, vaccines cause autism, 9/11 was an inside job, etc.), but I usually just dismissed them with a shake of my head and maybe even a chuckle.

 

I know that evil men can join together to do evil things, but I just didn’t think men were competent enough to pull off the usually elaborate machinations these theories proposed. 

 

Of course, the past five years changed my perspective, and I’m not alone in this shift. It’s not that I see conspiracy theories everywhere; I still firmly accept that we landed on the moon, for example. However, after witnessing the massive gaslighting done by our authorities in order to give them more power and control over our lives, I realized that many conspiracy theories were conspiracy facts.

 

The lies that accompanied the Covid pandemic were particularly galling, as people were accused of wanting to “kill grandma” just because they didn’t accept obviously false claims about the virus.

 

While I don’t subscribe to some of the most extreme of the conspiracies (I don’t think the Covid vaccine was produced specifically to kill us, for example), I’m now far more open to the reality of high-level conspiracies in our government and other institutions. And like I said, there are many otherswho joined me in my skepticism of the dominant narrative.

 

Conservative commenter/ Israel operative Ben Shapiro says Epstein wasn't Mossad because former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett says he wasn't

Which brings me to Jeffrey Epstein and his infamous “client list” of rich and powerful child rapists. When Epstein’s case became prominent in 2019 I barely followed it. I suspected he didn’t kill himself, but that wasn’t much of a conspiracy theory—it just seemed obvious that he had information on very powerful people and that at least one of those people didn’t want it made publicly known.

 

It’s not like men haven’t been killed in this type of situation throughout history. But how was this any different from the normal DC corruption that flares up every few years?

 

 

Since 2019, however, the story has grown beyond all expectations. A number of major politicians and celebrities have been implicated for allegedly being on the Epstein List, including Prince Andrew and Bill Gates as well as Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.

 

Further, it’s been suggested that Epstein was actually an agent for Israel. Considering the deep connection between America and Israel, and the fact that our connection to Israel has involved us for decades in numerous military conflicts in the Middle East, the idea that we might have blackmailable pedophile government leaders beholden to a foreign government makes this far more than a run-of-the-mill story of political corruption.

 

During the 2024 presidential campaign Donald Trump tapped into the energy behind those calling for a release of the Epstein List to help propel him to the White House. Multiple times during the campaign Trump said he would release the List. In early September 2024 for instance on the Lex Fridman podcast he stated he’d have “no problem with” releasing the Epstein List.

 

On the October 22, 2024 Theo Vonn podcast, J.D. Vance explicitly said “we need to release the Epstein List.” Before the election, both Kash Patel and Dan Bongino—who became Trump’s FBI Director and Deputy Director, respectively—stated many times that there was an Epstein List being used to manipulate government officials to this day, and the List needed to be released.

 

And of course, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in February of this year stated that the List “was sitting on my desk right now to review.” 

 

Yet now we are told by Bondi, Patel, and Bongino that there actually is no list and that Epstein definitely committed suicide. Trump has gone even further, attacking a reporter for even asking about Epstein, and then posting a long rambling screed on Truth Social suggesting that the whole Epstein conspiracy theory was something made up by liberals, comparing it to the Russia Hoax. He ended by saying that Epstein was “somebody no one cares about.” 

 

No one cares? I’m sorry, Mr. President, but a lot of Americans care about the possibility of being led by pedophiles and being a puppet of a foreign government.

 

And it’s clear that a lot of people care: in spite of what Trump said, his post actually got “ratio’d,” meaning there was more resistance to what he said than support from his own followers. This was the first time that had happened on his own social media platform.

 

So what’s going on? Was the whole Epstein case a big nothingburger that got a lot of right-wingers riled up without cause? Or does this mean the Epstein situation is so deeply embedded in our government that Trump and his team are also now beholden to it?

 

Here’s the truth: I don’t know and you don’t either. But here’s what I suspect: I think either Trump or someone close to him is implicated in the Epstein List, or that someone is implicated who is important to Trump’s goals, and so he decided to try to squash interest in Epstein among his base.

 

Whether I’m right about his motives or not, Trump miscalculated. While he has historically been masterful in both understanding and manipulating his base, this time it just didn’t work. Too many people associated with Trump (as well as Trump himself) had whipped up the base for years with the promise of releasing the Epstein List—we can’t just drop the subject no matter how much Trump wants that to happen.

 

It’s important to understand the overall context to see why much of Trump’s base isn’t happy about this ham-handed redirection. In the first few months of the Trump 2.0 presidency, he fulfilled a large number of his promises, and took concrete steps to fulfill many more.

 

His administration was working hard to cut wasteful spending, MAHA was getting off the ground under RFK, Jr., and the appointments of Bondi, Patel, and Bongino seemed to indicate that Trump was serious about draining the swamp.

 

Yet since May it seems that the direction of the Trump Administration has shifted. Trump fell out with Elon Musk over the “Big Beautiful Bill” which would do little to cut spending; America got directly involved in the military conflict between Israel and Iran after first indicating we wouldn’t; and we sent more weapons to Ukraine after Trump campaigned on pulling support for Ukraine and ending that war.

 

So there was already a growing dissatisfaction among at least some elements of Trump’s base, and his attempt to sweep Epstein under the rug just inflamed those elements more.

 

 

Jean-Luc Brunel, Epstein's "talent" Scout. Got Epsteined in prison. Dead.

Ghislaine Maxwell's Dad. Epsteined off his boat. Peter Thiel's boyfriend. Epsteined out a window. Dead. Jeffrey Epstein. Epsteined in prison. Dead.

Why does all this matter? Let’s return to how we began: the growing acceptance of conspiracy theories. Obviously it’s not good to be lied to and gaslighted by our institutions simply because the truth is superior to a lie, but the constant and bald-faced lies also lead to a total loss of trust in anything someone in authority says. Even when they are telling the truth we suspect they are lying, and a society simply cannot function like this for long.

 

 

Sadly, the most likely path becomes revolution, which is often violent in nature, and which no Catholic should desire. On the Fourth Sunday after Pentecost on the old calendar, we pray in the Collect, 

Grant us, we beseech Thee, O Lord, that the world may be regulated in its course by Thy governance for our peace, and that Thy Church may with tranquil devotion rejoice.

 

Catholics should always desire peace and tranquility fostered by a stable and just government. As long as our leaders continue to gaslight us, however, we cannot have that, and we will sink deeper into a trustless society in which order and the common good is at risk.

 

I’ve heard some well-meaning people argue that perhaps the Epstein List shouldn’t be released even if it exists because it could break up the country and topple our government. Sadly, the constant lies and corruption of recent years is already putting us on that trajectory. Perhaps a strong dose of radical transparency is just what we need to halt the decline.

Release the Epstein List!https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/why-the-epstein-list-matters

 

St Pius X, pray for us

CATHOLIC DOCTRINE IS 'HATE SPEECH': GOOGLE

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. 

 

It's not as if we haven't been warned. And by no less a person than the Mother of God.  The conciliar, Novus Ordo Synodal sect is no longer the Catholic church as we knew it. But there's evidence of what we knew already, that the Deep State of Davos prefers the Deep Church  -  the conciliar, Novus Ordo Synodal sect installed in the Vatican - to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church founded by Christ: Catholic doctrine is now being censored.

Last week the traditional Italian Catholic blog Messa in Latino was removed by Google from its platform, Blogspot, for "hate speech". As the best source of Vatican news and leaks, it had noised abroad Jorge Mario Bergoglio's mendacious manipulation of the bishops' survey in order to suppress the Latin Mass worldwide. And about this particular leak certain parties, it's said, were simply furious.

Strange to relate, this humble rad-trad blog, which shares the same platform, nosedived as never before after reporting on that scandal too, and on +Leo XIV making yet another Lavender Mafia appointment, and wearing the satanic pectoral cross of Joseph Cardinal Bernardin. Does the Deep State of Global Technocratic Communism (so cogently described by the excommunicated Archbishop Vigano) have a vested interest in protecting the conciliar popes of the Deep Church?   

 

St Jacinta Marto of Fatima: "Russia will spread her errors throughout the world' From The Remnant Magazine: The Vatican has been caught, again, in a blatant deception, this time over the very document that declared war on the traditional Latin Mass. We now know that the bishops consulted in 2020 overwhelmingly opposed restrictions on Summorum Pontificum.

 

The “episcopal wishes” Pope Francis claimed to be honoring in Traditionis Custodes were either misrepresented or ignored outright. The real decision, it seems, came from a few unelected bureaucrats in the Congregation for Divine Worship, not from the shepherds of the Church.

 

This revelation, rightly dubbed “Vatican Watergate,” should have rocked the foundations. Instead, we get silence, or worse, calls for “patience.” The institutional machine doesn’t blink. And neither, apparently, does Cardinal Raymond Burke.

The Apostasy That Dare Not Speak Its Name

 

Burke recently preached on the Fatima message, warning of the “practical apostasy” infecting the Church: souls turning from Christ, clergy living in contradiction to the Gospel, and spiritual confusion reigning. It’s a bold phrase. But what exactly is this apostasy? Who is driving it? Burke never says. And that’s the problem.

If Leo XIV is the true pope, as Burke insists, then isn’t it his job to end the apostasy? To stop the confusion, reassert doctrine, and reverse the damage? Burke seems to sense the storm but refuses to name the captain steering the ship into it. He denounces the storm clouds but salutes the helm.

 

No Correction, No Clarity

 

When Francis refused to answer the five Dubia, questions directly asking whether his teachings contradicted Scripture and Tradition, Burke issued no formal correction. No call for renunciation. No public appeal for repentance. Only silence, followed by exile.

 

Now, under Leo, we are told that this is a new day. A man of “interiority” and “community,” an Augustinian friend of the peripheries. But nothing essential has changed. Traditionis Custodes remains in force. Bishops loyal to the Mass of the Ages are still being replaced. The “errors of Russia,” materialism, collectivism, and doctrinal relativism, continue to spread from Rome, not in opposition to it.

 

Imagine the Novus Ordo Mass in this setting

Where is Burke’s call for the Holy Father to fulfill Our Lady’s requests, not with vague gestures or ambiguous prayers, but with a clear and public consecration? Where is his demand that Leo condemn the lies of Fiducia Supplicans, the banishment of tradition, and the ongoing global synodal revolution?If the apostasy is real, and it is, why was its architect allowed to remain on the Chair of Peter?

 

The Myth of Francis the Outlier

 

Part of the psychological trick lies in the illusion that Francis was an aberration, an isolated liberal interlude. Now that Leo is here, continuity will return. But continuity with what?

 

Leo’s election was hailed as a moment of global ecclesial unity. Why? Because, we are told, he “checked all the boxes”: mission field, peripheries, collegial diplomacy. Above all, he worked closely with Francis. This is not reform, but regime consolidation. A smoother operator advancing the same program with more tact and fewer headlines.

 

And yet we’re told to wait. To trust. To see who Leo really is. As if the calendar erased what came before.

 

The Crisis Is Not Just Policy, It’s Truth

 

Burke speaks movingly of those who live contrary to the Faith, who spread confusion and embrace lies. But it is precisely official Vatican documents, from Amoris Laetitia to Traditionis Custodes to Fiducia Supplicans, that have codified those lies.

 

They have formalized confusion.

 

"Formalised confusion"

 

The Latin Mass wasn’t simply restricted. It was accused of fostering “division,” and those attached to it were accused of being “ideologically distorted.” The Mass canonized by Trent and loved by the saints is now, according to the Vatican’s highest liturgical officials, a threat to unity.

 

"A threat to unity"

 

This is not mere policy, but theological inversion. The truth has been rebranded as dangerous. And the pope remains silent, or complicit.

 

The “Supreme Law” of Sentiment

 

In a recent Angelus address, Leo XIV declared that the supreme law is to “serve life by caring for others,” even before society’s rules. Sounds noble. But where is the “supreme law” of divine worship? Of doctrinal clarity? Of saving souls?

 

Charity without truth is not love. It’s flattery. And the Church is being drowned in it.

 

Leo invokes eternity but replaces it with activism. He speaks of salvation but makes it horizontal. The Gospel is reduced to accompaniment. And yet the men charged with guarding the faith remain mute, afraid of “schism,” or of losing their pensions.

 

Conclusion: Burke’s Broken Compass

 

Cardinal Burke has spent years warning about the crisis in the Church. But warnings are no longer enough. If the apostasy is real, then the silence about its source is complicity. The faithful deserve clarity. Not euphemism. Not sentimentality. Not empty appeals to “Fatima.”

 

Our Lady did not come to request general prayers. She asked for repentance, for consecration, for a return to Catholic truth. And she warned what would happen if that call went unheeded.

 

We’re living in the aftermath. If Leo is pope, Burke should demand that he condemn the lies, repeal Traditionis Custodes, and restore the Mass. If he won’t, then he should finally issue that formal correction he threatened and never followed through on. If not, he should stop pretending that the crisis can be solved from within the walls that built it.

 

The apostasy has a name. And so does the silence that enables it.Chris Jackson from Hiraeth In Exile <bigmodernism@substack.com>

 

Raymond Cardinal Burke

 

 

 

On July 11, 2025, the blog Messa in Latino was removed without any prior notice from the Blogspot platform, owned by Google. This is truly alarming because the site was the primary source of unofficial Catholic Traditionalist news, often straight from the Vatican and the Holy See.

 

Since then, visitors are met with the blunt message: “Sorry, the blog has been removed and the address is not available for new blogs.” This development—widely covered by Italian press (see here, here, here, here, here, here) and also echoed abroad (see here)—has taken on truly alarming proportions when one considers that the site, while not a formal news outlet, was the primary source of unofficial Catholic Traditionalist news, often straight from the Vatican and the Holy See.

 

Just to illustrate: Messa in Latino recorded over one million global page views in the month of June 2025 alone, with 22,000 posts published or archived, and around 250 more already scheduled for release. Founded in 2007 following the publication of Benedict XVI’s Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, the blog became one of the most prominent critical voices against Pope Francis in Italy starting in 2013.

 

 

It has often published firsthand sources well ahead of others, concerning documents, reforms, scandals, and internal proceedings within the Leonine Walls. A blunt and uncompromising blog, no doubt—but always respectful of truth and of the Church’s hierarchy.

 

The blog was run by four Italian lay Catholics, but the most recognizable figure is undoubtedly that of entrepreneur Luigi Casalini. A longtime friend of this writer, Luigi is certainly not someone who spreads hatred or discord—rather, he is a candid individual who contributes, with the resources at his disposal, to the protection and promotion of Catholic worship.

 

During the three years I collaborated with Fede & Cultura—Italy’s most prominent Catholic publishing house in the traditionalist sphere—I frequently had the chance to organize livestreams featuring Casalini. And I consistently noticed something rather curious: YouTube, also owned by Google, regularly penalized and limited the visibility and distribution of these videos.

 

Casalini’s remarks were typically aimed at (very politely) criticizing certain decisions made by Pope Francis. Has Google suddenly become an ardent defender of the papacy? We have serious doubts about that.

 

A troublesome investigative book?

 

It remains unclear which specific post or statement triggered Google’s censorship. In recent months, Google had already taken down several particularly sensitive articles without warning—only to restore them later, after the blog's administrators requested clarification.

 

These included: an interview with Bishop Strickland opposing the admission of women to the diaconate; a scholarly piece by Professor Corrado Gnerre exploring the fraught historical relationship between the Catholic Church and Masonic obediences; a reference to official Catholic doctrine on same-sex relationships; and finally, a post dating back over ten years featuring a video of Kiko Arguello, founder of the Neocatechumenal Way, in which he expressed hope that Pope Benedict XVI would pass away.

 

 

Fr Nicola Bux: "Francis cannot abdicate his duty to teach clearly" 

More likely, however, what triggered the guillotine this time was an interview conducted by Luigi Casalini with Fr. Nicola Bux (available in Italian here). Together with well-known Catholic commentator Saverio Gaeta, Fr. Bux co-authored the book La Liturgia non è uno spettacolo (Fede & Cultura, 2025), an investigative work released in the midst of the scandal surrounding Pope Francis's Motu Proprio Traditionis Custodes. Curiously, the book was also removed from Amazon around the same time.

 

In the book, Bux and Gaeta revisit the concerns already raised several days earlier by Vatican journalist Diane Montagna, offering a deeper exploration from both historical and theological perspectives. Saverio Gaeta skillfully traces the entire history of the “liturgical war” waged over the past century by ecclesiastical Freemasonry and neomodernist theologians—from the reforms preceding 1962, to Summorum Pontificum, and ultimately Traditionis Custodes.

 

Particular emphasis is placed on the work of the Consilium established by Paul VI to clarify and implement the directives of the conciliar Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium regarding the liturgy and its reform.

 

Fr. Bux had already spoken exclusively with us at The Remnant about the importance of recovering, studying, and delving deeper into these works. Readers can find the full interview with Fr. Nicola Bux at this link.

 

 

Pro-TLM billboards in Rome featuring MiL posts 

Bux and Gaeta’s book goes on to thoroughly analyze the now-famous questionnaire on the pastoral effectiveness of Summorum Pontificum, circulated in 2020 at the behest of the then Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which had yielded positive results.

 

Those results, however, were allegedly tampered with and manipulated by Francis and his most fervent anti-Tridentine allies (Roche, Viola, Parolin—see here for details), in order to ban the free celebration of the Mass according to the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.

 

Could this be the real reason behind Google’s censorship? Accusing Francis of having “lied” (not my words—I usually prefer a moderate tone—but those of a sizable number of commentators and Vatican observers from around the globe) about the true intentions of the bishops?

This blog was't one of them. Bergoglio didn't literally lie; he just drastically manipulated the truth. As he was wont to do. As we know. 

  

This was Fr. Bux’s response to Casalini’s final question: “Whoever devised Traditionis Custodes and its related measures did not implement synodality. Not only that: they distorted the synodality expressed by the bishops in their answers to the questionnaire [emphasis ours, Ed.]. Regarding these ‘sins against synodality,’ let a mea culpa be made, and let us gradually return to the status quo ante. The entire Church will benefit from it.”

 

The implications of such censorship

Let us return for a moment to the accusation leveled by Google against the blog Messainlatino.it. Is Catholic doctrine truly a discourse that incites hatred?

 

In the meantime, after (unsuccessfully) sending Google a letter co-signed by four lawyers, highlighting the unjustified suppression of freedom of the press and expression—explicitly protected by Article 21 of the Italian Constitution—an emergency legal proceeding has been scheduled for Monday, July 14, 2025.

 

The case seeks a judicial review of the decision to de-index and obscure the blog’s content, in accordance with Article 700 of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure, and requests the immediate suspension of the platform’s action and restoration of the site’s visibility, pending an ordinary ruling.

 

Italy is, supposedly, the quintessential Catholic country. But if even in Italy it is no longer permitted to publicly profess the Catholic faith in its most pure and integral form, where else will it be?

 

Where can the Traditional Mass still be defended, the Catechism quoted, theological errors denounced, and appeal made to the Church’s enduring Tradition?

 

To what extent is it reasonable to suspect that a systematically anti-Christian mindset is influencing the criteria by which global platforms decide what can or cannot be said? And to what extent can one tolerate that Christ’s doctrine—built upon the inseparable union of truth and charity—is being labeled as “hate speech”?

 

Are we not, by now, immersed in a new form of totalitarianism? A subtle, digital totalitarianism that—for the moment, at least—does not come dressed in uniforms or wielding batons, but cloaked in algorithms and opaque policies, enforced by the quiet power of automated censorship and “terms of service.”

 

A Novus Ordo church - "a new form of totalitarianism"

 

Yet it is precisely this silence that harbors its deepest danger. We no longer erase the person—we erase the word. And with it, memory. And with it, truth.

 

This censorship is not merely against a blog: it is a symptom of real hatred—the world’s hatred—directed at faith and at the freedom of Catholics.

 

We have long entered a historical moment in which fidelity to Christ and to the eternal Church is not merely poorly tolerated, but actively persecuted. A mute Church is desired: submissive, molded to fit secular mentality, the rhetoric of inclusivity, and the logic of political and media power. But is this not precisely the worldly spirit the Lord sternly warned us against? The Remnant Newspaper - BREAKING! Outrage in Italy: Google Silences Leading Voice of Catholic Tradition

 

 

“No, I say to you; but except you do penance, you shall all likewise perish” (Lk 13:5).