Thursday, 18 September 2025

TLM IN VIOLATED ST PETER'S "NEFARIOUS": CANON LAW

 

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Please nnte, anti-Catholic rants are not posted on this page except to elucidate points of Church doctrine.

 





"We're back!" is the chorus from traditionalists in the Catholic Church, rejoicing over +Leo XIV's permission for Cardinal Raymond Burke to preside over a pontifical Latin Mass in St Peter's in October.


"Not so fast!" says the cantankerous Ann Barnhardt, an acerbic critic of the Synodal Antichurch usurpers currently occupying the Vatican. While Michael Matt of The Remnant newspaper and other Catholic influencers urge Trad Inc to "zip it" with criticism of +Leo's regime, hoping for restoration of the TLM, Barnhardt points to the pressing need for St Peter's to be purified following its desecration by the LGBTQ Pilgrimage and the Pachamama idol.


Canon 1173 states that "impious and sordid use" of a church is a violation. St Peter's was violated by a satanic, multicolored sodomy cross, the slogan F*CK THE RULES, the satanic battle cry “Non serviam”, transvestitism, hand-holding, touching and kissing. 


Canon 11733 further states that "it is nefarious to celebrate the Divine Office (or) to minister the Sacraments" in a violated church before it is reconciled, as quickly as possible. 


Without that reconciliation it is absolutely forbidden for Cardinal Burke to celebrate the Latin Mass in the Petrine Basilica. Canon law prevents it and would make it a scandal even more nefarious than tolerance of that sodomite invasion. 


 



First, a post from Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano which seems apposite:

  

 In recent days, we have seen:

- LGBTQ+ chaplain James Martin received in audience by Leo - the LGBTQ+ pilgrimage to St Peter Basilica, desecrated with rainbow crosses and sacrilegious slogans

 

- St. Peters Square desecrated by a vulgar massonic kermesse - the ecumenical-indifferentist event with the omission of the Filioque - the Vatican’s umpteenth participation in the syncretic Sabbath of Astana
- a “priest” celebrating the “wedding” of two sodomites, profaning the Sacrament

 

We don’t need drones or circus effects to make it clear that the specter of Bergoglio and the nightmare of sixty years of anti-Christian revolution in the Catholic Church looms ominously over Prevost’s “fluid pontificate.”

 

 

A conciliar Antichurch priest blesses the 'wedding' of sodomites  

 

And now, Ann Barnhardt: 


St. Peter’s Basilica was gravely, notoriously desecrated for the SECOND TIME on Saturday, September 6th, ARSH 2025 when a mob of militant, unrepentant sodomites marched on the Basilica, entered through the Holy Door, and desecrated the Petrine Basilica with satanic signs and attire.

 

There was a satanic multicolored sodomy cross, a backpack with the slogan F*CK THE RULES, the battle cry of satanism (“Non serviam” and “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”), and their comportment, including transvestitism, hand holding, touching and kissing.

 

A sacrilegious Mass and sermon at the Church of the Gesù in which a sodomite bishop, at the DIRECT BEHEST of Antipope Robert  Prevost, made a declaration of war and activation switch for vengeance for God’s just destruction of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah and for the Church’s immemorial, immutable and infallible teaching that willful sodomy and transvestitism are one of the four grave sins that cry out to heaven for God’s vengeance.   

They are CAPITAL CRIMES according to both Natural and Divine Law. Less than a week latera man who masquerades as a woman and dresses as an animal for the purposes of satanic ritual sodomy, assassinated Charlie Kirk who had made statements critical of sodomy and transvestitism, in particular with regards to children.

 

Sodomites in St Peter's 


This desecration of BOTH the Petrine Basilica and the Church of the Gesù came nearly SIX YEARS after Antipope Bergoglio ordered the desecration of the Petrine Basilica with the cult worship of the Pachamama demon, which gives every appearance of being an alias of Lucifer himself, by placing a ritually cursed totem representing the Pachamama/satan upon the high altar of St. Peter’s as a witch ritually processed the Pachamama/satanic totem into the Basilica.



 

Here’s the text of Canon Law from the 1911 Code. Emphases mine:

Canon 1173 (1983 CIC 1211) Cross-Ref.: 1917 CIC 2329
§ 1. A church is violated only by the below-listed acts, provided they are certain, notorious, and were placed inside the church:
1.° The delict of homicide;
2.° An injurious and grave flow of blood;
3.° Impious and sordid use to which the church was put;
4.° Burial of an infidel or an excommunicate after a declaratory or condemnatory
sentence;
§ 2. A violated church, but not the cemetery, even if it is contiguous, can be considered violated, and vice versa.
Canon 1173 (1983 CIC 1211)
§ 1. In a violated church, before it has been reconciled, it is nefarious to celebrate the divine office, to minister the Sacraments, or to bury the dead.
§ 2. If the violation occurs at the time of the divine office, these cease immediately; if [it was] before the canon of the Mass or after communion, Mass is dismissed; otherwise, the priest shall continue the Mass until communion.
Canon 1174 (NA)

§ 1. A violated church is to be reconciled as quickly as possible according to the rites described in the approved liturgical books.
§ 2. If there is doubt about whether a church has been violated, it can be reconciled as a precaution.

 

Note the words of the Canon, folks. It is NEFARIOUS to celebrate the Sacraments, of which the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is supreme, in a desecrated church until it has been reconciled. Note how churches are addressed in Canon Law and in the Ritual as personified, and thus a church is “reconciled” just as we are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Confession.

 


 

Furthermore, it is absolutely scandalous that the Summorum Pontificum organizers are having the monstrous, notorious faggot Cardinal Matteo Zuppi preside at the Pontifical Vespers to open the event. ++Zuppi is openly pro-sodomy and transvestitism.

 

He has also publicly declared that any person who commits euthanasia suicide in the Archdiocese of Bologna (mortal sin as one’s last act, spitting in God’s face and demanding to “be like God” as satan said in The Garden) and is denied a Catholic funeral Mass of the Resurrection (a de facto canonization), then he, Zuppi, will personally celebrate the funeral.

 

 

The diocese of Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi has staged the first public blessing of a homosexual union

 

The organizers of the Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage are FULLY aware of what Zuppi is (a faggot) and what he is NOT (a Catholic), and yet they BRAG about his participation as a twisted form of virtue signaling. This is GRAVE scandal. Look at Marquant’s words: “We are very proud and honored by the participation of the Cardinal of Bologna… it is an eloquent sign of peace and charity among all Catholics.”  

 



MY. WHAT A VERY, VERY ODD THING TO SAY. Why WOULDN’T one be at peace with a Cardinal Prince of the Church? Oh yeah, because he is a SODOMITE and an arch-heretic who militates for SUICIDE, and Marquant knows this perfectly well, and prides himself (that word just keeps popping up, doesn’t it?) on his open flirtation and PUBLIC ASSOCIATION with sodomites at the highest levels of the Antichurch. 

 

The Italian Bishops Conference (President Cardinal Zuppi) finances illegal immigration of criminal and violent Mohammedans. The Bergoglian church is totally subservient to Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset.


And NO, Cardinal Burke celebrating Mass in the Petrine Basilica will NOT NOT NOT reconcile the Church. In fact, it will be exactly the opposite.

 

It will be, per the Canon itself, NEFARIOUS, and will cause more scandal as TOLERANCE of SODOMY and luciferian acts of desecration of not just any church, but St. Peter’s Basilica itself, and blown off as no big deal, requiring nothing more than saying Mass… which Canon Law made clear is absolutely prohibited until the church is ritually purified ACCORDING TO THE RITUALE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.

 

ACTION ITEM: Tell Cardinal Burke and the Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage organizers that St. Peter’s Basilica must be reconciled according to Holy Tradition and Canon Law after having been notoriously defiled by sodomites.

Cardinal Burke can be contacted through his website, and through Twitter:

Cardinal Burke’s Website Contact Page

Cardinal Burke’s Twitter page:

https://x.com/cardinalrlburke

Here is the Contact Page of the Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage:

https://it.summorum-pontificum.org


Also please contact the Summorum Pontificum organizers, and any of the associated organizations listed on the Summorum Pontificum website. This event is not scheduled to occur  until the last weekend of October, so there is plenty of time to A.) Organize the reconciliation Ritual of St. Peter’s or B.) change venues to a church that has NOT been publicly and notoriously desecrated and C.) DISINVITE the scandalous heretic and sodomite ++Zuppi from the Pontifical Vespers.

 

I’m sure any priest involved with the Pilgrimage would be happy to hear Zuppi’s confession of his heresy and promotion of sodomy, suicide and human trafficking (Zuppi is a head and principal patron of the massive human trafficking racket “Sant’Egidio”.) 

Be firm yet POLITE in ALL correspondence. Include the Canon Law citations AND the Ritual of Reconciliation of a profaned church so they can’t claim ignorance.

 


 

For the sake of thoroughness, below please see THE RITUAL that MUST BE PERFORMED to Reconcile a profaned church. Please contact Cardinal Burke and make ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that he knows that the Petrine Basilica must be ritually reconciled, and that to celebrate the Mass in an unreconciled, profaned church is an act of NEFARIOUS scandal.

SOURCE HERE 

https://www.barnhardt.biz/2025/

 


 

Our Lady of Copacabana, slayer of the Pachamama demon and Mother of the Church, pray for us.

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on us.

Tuesday, 16 September 2025

MENTAL ILLNESS FAR MORE LIKELY POST-ABORTION: STUDY


To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X. Anti-Catholic rants will not be posted on this page except to explicate Catholic doctrine. 



 

Adoption: the solution for 'problem' pregnancies 



"Every Christian artist, pastor, ministry leader and organization," said Charlie Kirk, "should speak out boldly against killing unborn babies. If we did, we could end abortion."


The deadly business of abortion and its foetal body parts industry is worth billions. Planned Parenthood alone made $2 billion last year. Charlie Kirk's US-wide campaign, which influenced Donald Trump in defunding Planned Parenthood this week, may well have cost him his life.


Leftists everywhere are praising his assassination and jumping at the chance to name more potential victims. "Violence is coming to you," they say. This is what happens when society slaughters God's little ones - murdering babies leads to cheers at the murder of adults. And to mental illness, suicide and substance abuse for the secondary victims of abortion - the mothers of those dead babies, who a new study shows are far more likely to suffer such disorders than their peers.


"Revenge is mine, and I will repay them in due time, that their foot may slide: the day of destruction is at hand" (Deut 32, 350. The world is being repaid for its wanton destruction of human life. And we ain't seen nothin' yet.



We apologise for the obscenity but watch him lose his debate with Kirk here: https://x.com/i/status/1966464274538062276


 Charlie Kirk debates abortion here:

https://x.com/i/status/1966290665308069894

https://x.com/i/status/1967622443159474658



A few days ago, a team of Canadian researchers published an extraordinary study in The Journal of Psychiatric Research – a study that has the potential to transform the conversation about abortion.

 

Drawing on medical records from over 1.2 million pregnancies in Quebec between 2006 and 2022, the study tracked women’s mental health for up to 17 years. Its findings were stark: women who had undergone abortions were far more likely to be hospitalized for mental health disorders, suicide attempts, and substance use disorders.

 

The study found that the risks were especially pronounced among women under 25 and were most acute in the first five years. However, they found that the elevated mental health risks persisted for up to seventeen years after the abortion!

As they summarized:

Hospitalization rates were elevated for all types of mental disorders following abortion. Compared with other pregnancies, patients with abortions had higher hospitalization rates for any mental disorder (104.0 vs. 42.0 per 10,000 person-years), psychiatric disorders (85.1 vs 37.1 per 10,000 person-years), substance use disorders (56.7 vs 15.0 per 10,000 person-years), and suicide attempts (14.7 vs 4.4 per 10,000 person-years)…

 

Abortion was associated with the long-term risk of hospitalization for psychiatric disorders, substance use disorders, and  suicide attempts in models adjusted for age, comorbidity, preexisting mental illness, material deprivation, rural residence, and time period. Abortion was more strongly associated with eating disorders, hallucinogen use disorders, and cocaine use disorders.

 

In introducing their study, the authors note that high quality studies on the risks of abortion are few and far between. “Large population-based studies with long-term follow-up are rare yet necessary to understand the mental health needs of women post abortion,” they wrote, adding that the few studies that do exist typically do not examine the risks beyond three years.

 

Given the millions of women who have undergone abortions, you would think that studying the risks of this procedure would be a top priority for scientists. And yet, as with so many other issues that are sacred to the progressive left, there is a profound lack of curiosity about what could prove to be inconvenient truths.

 

The new study, which was published in one of the leading journals of psychiatry, marks a significant step towards remedying this deficit. The study is noteworthy for the sheer size of the data set being used, and the length of time that it tracked women’s mental health. This makes it one of the most rigorous studies ever published on this issue.

 



Abortion as Both Moral and Psychological Wound

 

For the Catholic Church, these findings are not surprising. Long before psychiatry could track these outcomes statistically, the Church, rooted in both faith and reason, spoke of abortion not only as the taking of innocent life but also as a profound wound to the woman herself.

 

In his landmark encyclical Evangelium vitae, Pope St. John Paul II drew attention to the messiness and ugliness of abortion, while also highlighting the profound, and profoundly negative impact that it has upon mothers.

 

“The unborn child is totally entrusted to the protection and care of the woman carrying him or her in the womb,” the Holy Father wrote. “And yet sometimes it is precisely the mother herself who makes the decision and asks for the child to be eliminated, and who then goes about having it done” (EV,no. 58).

 

However, he added, it is necessary to take into account the enormous pressures that the expectant mother who chooses abortion may be under: pressures that in many cases leave the woman feeling as if she is stuck between a rock and a hard place, with nowhere to go for relief.

 

John Paul II Prophetic Warning

 

“It is true that the decision to have an abortion is often tragic and painful for the mother, insofar as the decision to rid herself of the fruit of conception is not made for purely selfish reasons or out of convenience,” noted Pope St. John Paul II, “but out of a desire to protect certain important values such as her own health or a decent standard of living for the other members of the family. Sometimes it is feared that the child to be born would live in such conditions that it would be better if the birth did not take place” (EV, no. 58).

 

“Nevertheless,” Pope St. John Paul II added firmly, “these reasons and others like them, however serious and tragic, can never justify the deliberate killing of an innocent human being” (EV, no. 58).

 

Fr. Paul Marx, HLI’s founder, and Pope John Paul II


 

The Holy Father then goes on to argue, at length, that abortion implicates and harms everyone involved in the abortion: the child, yes, but also the mother, the father, the “doctors” who use their training in healing for the purpose of killing, and the broader society, which suffers the moral reverberations caused by institutionalizing killing as a key component of how it functions.

 

And yet, in a very special way, it affects the mother. The reasons for this are myriad. But of central importance is what Pope John Paul II noted above: that the preborn child depends utterly upon the body of the mother for health and safety. In many ways, motherhood is deeply programed into the genetic and physiological makeup of the woman, and even if she “chooses” abortion, her body knows at some level that what she is doing is contrary to her nature.

 

No wonder that women so often feel so deeply violated after abortion. And no wonder, as this new study reveals, the trauma seems to go deep down into the psyche of the mother, haunting her for years, even decades, after the event. 

 

Hope and Healing Through the Church

 

When Pope Paul VI issued Humanae vitae in 1968, he was widely ridiculed for suggesting that a culture that severs sex from responsibility would not liberate women, but harm them. He predicted that contraception and abortion would lead to broken families, commodified sexuality, and a loss of respect for women themselves (cf. HV, no 17).

 

Today, more than half a century later, we can see that his warnings were prophetic. The Quebec study is one more confirmation: when pregnancy is treated as a problem to be “solved,” women themselves become collateral damage. Instead of liberating them, abortion entangles them in new chains—chains of guilt, psychological trauma, and often secrecy.

 

https://youtu.be/2DnwmeMG7t8?list=PLLj_bYHqrHFncphaI0wM7gdA_lP3u3XHN

 

The Catholic Church has never spoken against abortion out of hostility toward women, but precisely out of love for them. Pope Paul VI’s teaching was not a rejection of human freedom, but a defense of the truth that love and life cannot be separated without harming both.

 

Pope Francis often spoke about the Church as a “field hospital after battle.” In such a hospital, the first task is to bind wounds, not to ask how they were inflicted.

 

In a moving section of Evangelium vitae, Pope John Paul II offered his deep compassion to women who have undergone abortions, and called them to repentance, forgiveness, and healing.

 



“I would now like to say a special word to women who have had an abortion,” he begins.

 

The Church is aware of the many factors which may have influenced your decision, and she does not doubt that in many cases it was a painful and even shattering decision. The wound in your heart may not yet have healed. Certainly, what happened was and remains terribly wrong.

 

But do not give in to discouragement and do not lose hope. Try rather to understand what happened and face it honestly. If you have not already done so, give yourselves over with humility and trust to repentance.

 

The Father of mercies is ready to give you his forgiveness and his peace in the Sacrament of Reconciliation. To the same Father and his mercy, you can with sure hope entrust your child. With the friendly and expert help and advice of other people, and as a result of your own painful experience, you can be among the most eloquent defenders of everyone’s right to life.

 

 Through your commitment to life, whether by accepting the birth of other children or by welcoming and caring for those most in need of someone to be close to them, you will become promoters of a new way of looking at human life (EV, no. 99).

 

This is what the Left is like


Truth and Love Together

 

Too many times, the pro-life movement is accused of being “anti-woman,” and of “condemning” women who have abortions. I’m sure I don’t have to tell you, but this is just wrong, at so many levels. For someone like myself, who has witnessed firsthand the love and sacrifices of so many ordinary pro-life activists, it is difficult to hear such accusations.

 

In the first place, it is a grave mistake to confuse clear moral teaching with condemnation of individual people who might violate a moral law. When moral teaching is done in love, and with an appropriate level of prudence, it is the most loving thing that a person can do for another!

 

After all, if someone were hurtling towards a cliff, and you stood at the edge of the cliff waving them off, people would certainly not accuse you of “hate” or “condemnation” towards cliff jumpers. Similarly, when the pro-life movement warns women of the negative physical, mental and spiritual effects of abortion, it is simply acting in love.

 

And in the second place, it is hard to think of another movement that has shown more love than the pro-life movement. It is true that the pro-life movement clearly calls abortion what it is: the killing of a preborn child. And yes, in a certain sense a woman who chooses abortion is culpable for a grave crime: that of the killing of an innocent human being.

self-explanatory

 


https://youtu.be/GBP7177RYsY?list=PLLj_bYHqrHFncphaI0wM7gdA_lP3u3XHN

 

And yet, at one and the same time, the pro-life movement takes into account the complex totality of the situation, acknowledging that many women are as much victims of sinister forces as is the preborn child whose life they have been involved in ending. For this reason, whole wings of the movement are devoted to offering compassion, love, forgiveness, and healing to women who have undergone abortions.

 

This includes ministries like Rachel’s Vineyard and Project Rachel, as well as numerous local community and parish groups. Such groups testify that forgiveness is real, that peace is possible, and that love can triumph even over death.

 

Women Called To Be Life-Givers

 

The data from the new study confirms what the Church has always known: abortion wounds both body and soul. Yet for pro-life leaders such as myself, there is no desire to wield these findings as weapons in a culture war, but rather to bring them into the light of truth and mercy.

 

In this way we can help women who have had abortions to heal, protect women who might consider abortion from going down a road strewn with thorns and regret, and in general help women rise up to the level of greatness to which they are called.

 


 

As Pope John Paul II wrote in Evangelium vitae, women have a particular genius. Their role in the world is to model for the world a kind of love that is deeper, more intimate, and more healing than any other.

 

“A mother welcomes and carries in herself another human being, enabling it to grow inside her, giving it room, respecting it in its otherness,” he wrote.

 

Women first learn and then teach others that human relations are authentic if they are open to accepting the other person: a person who is recognized and loved because of the dignity which comes from being a person and not from other considerations, such as usefulness, strength, intelligence, beauty or health. This is the fundamental contribution which the Church and humanity expect from women. And it is the indispensable prerequisite for an authentic cultural change (EV, no. 99).

 

This is a noble mission. But insofar as our society protects the so-called “right” to abortion, which in turn deeply incentivizes abortion in many cases, it draws women away from being their best selves; it perverts the feminine genius. And we all lose out. 

As this new study shows, abortion is not just a political issue, nor merely a moral question debated in abstract terms. It is a wound carried in the hearts of millions of women—and men, too, who often remain silent. If the Church is to be faithful to her mission, She must proclaim boldly that life is sacred, condemn the evil of abortion, while also extending arms of mercy to those who have fallen.

 

As president of Human Life International, Fr. Boquet is a leading expert on the international pro-life and family movement, having journeyed to nearly 90 countries on pro-life missions over the last decade. Father Boquet works with pro-life and family leaders in 116 counties that partner with HLI to proclaim and advance the Gospel of Life. Read his full bio here.

 


 

The Sistine Madonna (Michelangelo)

 

 Mary, Mother of Divine Grace, please pray for all mothers