DEI, CRT IN SOLICITOR-GENERAL'S RACIST GUIDELINES

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter).

Statue in Denmark at The Woman's Museum, renamed The Gender Museum.

https://www.jchristoff.com/.../the-shakespearian-agenda...

Diversity, Equity and Inclusivity (DEI) are the personal guidelines for NZ Solicitor-General Una Jagose KC - whose guidelines issued for New Zealand's prosecutors ask that they take account of someone's Maoriness when deciding how to prosecute. Or even if they should prosecute. Prosecutors are asked to "think carefully about particular decisions where a person (victim or defendant) is Maori".

Jagose is steeped in DEI, as any cursory study of her career will reveal. And the image above, of a new statue in Denmark outside what was formerly The Woman's Museum, now renamed The Gender Museum, reveals where this inherently racist, delusive, collectivist ideology which originated with Karl Marx, is leading Western society. To its demise.

Not only are NZ prosecutors to take Maoriness into account, but they should "engage with tikanga'. Jagose and her collaborator, ex-Black Power member Eugene Ryder, make no mention of prosecutors engaging with Chinese culture, or Philippino or Korean. Of course there would rarely be any need to do so, and that should tell us something. It's not 'colonisation' but precisely decades of being patronised and spoiled silly that has disadvantaged Maori. They are a fine race with no need for babying.

Una Jagose KC, NZ Solicitor-General

What makes Jagose think she'll get away with this preposterously racist suggestion, that NZ's courts take ancestry (but only Maori ancestry, note) into account? Attorney-General Judith (Crusher) Collins has stated that, "I've made it plain that I have issues with any suggestion that ethnicity should play a part in prosecutions".

Ah, but Jagose is a public servant, and she's besotted with the public service. Educated at Sacred Heart Hamilton (1980-85), she evidently imbibed that tired old Novus Ordo shibboleth of "social justice" which is simply socialism in disguise. And with Dutschke's "long march through the institutions" now pretty well finished, New Zealand's elected government has a hard time operating as anything less socialist than its public service. Jagose clearly thinks she has the upper hand.

She like most New Zealanders is of "diverse" ethnicity herself. Her father was a Parsi Indian and her mother an Irish nurse. At Sacred Heart she should have been taught the virtues of humility and obedience but those are better learned in the Traditional Latin Mass, embedded as they are in a liturgy which is God-centred rather than man-centred as in the Novus Ordo which is all Jagose would have known.

Here's Sean Plunket interviewing Don Brash, former leader of National and of the Opposition, spokesman for Hobson's Pledge:

Sean Plunket: Here we have a Solicitor-General acting in connivance with a charity run by former gang member Eugene Ryder and the head (or one of the kaumatua) of Ngai Tahu, Mark Solomon, has formulated a racist set of guidelines for prosecutors in NZ. They should take account of someone's Maoriness when deciding how to prosecute or even if they should prosecute, or charge them with a crime.

This sort of thing has been going on in our health and justice systems for years. It is all based on Critical Race Theory and it has been done without our knowledge or democratic input. But this is a test of the new Government to see whether or not they let Jagose get away with this.

As outrageous as it is, these new guidelines, it's not really that surprising is it in the context of how NZ's government and bureaucracy has been changed in the past 20 years?

DB: Well it wouldn't be surprising were it not for the fact that we've had a change of Government. This kind of racial preference has been built into the public service for a long time: if you're Maori you shouldn't be prosecuted in the same way as another ethnicity. It wouldn't have been surprising in Ardern's Government or even the Coalition between Ardern and Winston Peters.

But it's astonishing it's taking place now, when this Government has mde it very clear indeed that the public service and the law courts must treat New Zealanders as New Zealanders irrrespective of ancestry.

SP: Jagose has to withdraw these guidelines or I can't see how she can keep her job, Don.

DB: That's right. She can't keep her job. - "I've made it plain that I have issues with any suggestion that ethnicity should play a part in prosecutions." Judith Collins, the attorney general, has been very consistent on this idea that we should be one people irrespective of ancestry and I'd be very surprised if she were relaxed about what the Solicitor-General has said.

SP: Still, David Seymour - I don't know, people get into government Don, and suddenly they've got their rules and their code of conduct, and I feel like he could have been more definitive and I think that New Zealanders voted for a Government that would be more definitive than Seymour was.

DB: I don't think anyone listening to that (interview with Seymour) would have thought that David was relaxed about what the Solicitor-General said, but as he pointed out he's a member of Cabinet now and he has to be careful what he says. But I don't doubt where his position is.

A surprising number of people have not heard about this. Hobson's Pledge has had some very strong reactions. People did not know about it and are pretty appalled, and so the Government will be under huge pressure to make a change. Which means either changing the solicitor general or getting her to backtrack.

SP: The mainstream media don't seem particularly interested though, Don.

DB: Too often the mainstream media ignore these issues completely and its a serious affront to our democracy, what the solicitor-general said. Apparently she's totally oblivious to what the Government's policy is.

That of course is an effect of pride. It blinds one.

 

SP: I wonder if this non-democratic administration, this revolution of our institutions, is now so embedded and expected by those who practise Critical Race Theory that they can't quite see why it shouldn't be business as usual for them.

 

DB: As you suggest, the public service indoctrinated with this partnership notion that the Treaty of Waitangi established a partnership which is absolute balderdash, but the Public Service has bought into it and makes it a headache for any elected government. (Redacted.) https://youtu.be/5GV65DpJAiM -

ACT leader David Seymour has labelled these guidelines 'disgraceful'.

"If New Zealand is based on anything, it's the simple idea that no matter who you are and how you're born, you get equal rights and a fair shot at life. It is absolutely un-Kiwi."https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/heather-du-plessis-allan-drive/audio/david-seymour-act-party-leader-responds-to-the-solicitor-generals-updated-prosecution-guidelines/

The Last Judgment (Michelangelo)

Let not the evil-mouthed be established in the land; misfortune will bring down the unjust to destruction

- Psalm 139, Vespers, Thursday

  

 

 

+GIELEN EXPELLED FSSR ONLY ON WORD OF PADDY GOWER

 

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter).

Ever been had? Bishop Michael Gielen of Christchurch should realise that only one person has benefited from his decree against the Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer (FSSR) and that person is the hard-left sympathiser, ex-Catholic, Paddy Gower. He's been crying into his pillow over his sacking by Newshub, for whom he produced the shoddy "Paddy Gower Has Issues"which Bishop Gielen adduces as the only evidence for telling tales to Rome. 

"Bishop Gielen has never read the report" of the Apostolic Visitation ordered by the Vatican in response to his request for 'guidance', following the Gower brouhaha. Or so the bishop claims in a reply to an email of protest from the Latin Mass Society of New Zealand. And we believe him. Had he read it, his conscience might have dictated that he should disobey the Vatican's 'recommendations'. 

And anyway whatever the Visitator's report might reveal, Gower, according to one source, is "an habitual looting socialist parasite" who has made a career of supporting left-wing causes, especially the tyrannical regime of 'Dame' Jacinda Ardern. His Tv production company received $3 million from the taxpayers (via NZ on Air) to make shows on the now defunct Newshub network.https://x.com/i/status/1838066828608000439 He secretly stalked Dr Jonie Girouard of Kaiapoi and dobbed her in for issuing tenuously justified vaccine exemption certificates; she lost her job and Gower boasted about it. The whining of a few malcontents in the FSSR community was grist to his political mill. https://juliadufresne.blogspot.com/2023/07/paddy-gowers-issues-with-monks-beat-up.html

Newshub fell in trust by almost 8% in the last year.

So going by +Gielen's reply to the Latin Mass Society, it's simply on 'evidence' supplied by this disaffected, hardline, foul-mouthed socialist that New Zealand's first and only home-grown religious order, the Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer, was expelled from Christchurch and deprived of their priestly faculties.

Frs Michael Mary and Anthony Mary FSSR

or

Paddy Gower - whom would you believe?

This shameful incident is yet another illustration of the culture of effeminacy endemic in the Church today, affecting not only the faux Francis church but the entire Body of Christ. The Church has substituted Christ our Brother for God the Father, the result being clerical reluctance to assume the role of patriarchal authority which is proper to the ordained. It's the Novus Ordo effect.

Let no one suggest that Bishop Gielen had to obey Rome's diktat.  There is such a thing as false obedience, and this is what it looks like. St Peter said "We must obey God, not men"(Acts 5,29) and certainly not an antipope. 

Make no mistake, this is all about the Traditional Latin Mass, the Holy Eucharist which Satan hates and fears, and to defeat it he does not hesitate to make minions of the hierarchy. 

A bishop has three main responsibilities: to teach, to govern and to sanctify. Bishop Gielen has taught his flock that they may be deprived of Holy Mass on the word of a disaffected, hardline socialist. The bishop abrogated his responsibility to govern his diocese by ceding it to a corrupt hierarchy in the Vatican, and ultimately to an antipope. So that by failing to teach and to govern he has implicitly failed to sanctify his people.

Ah, but wouldn't you know it:

Theologians advising the Synod of Bishops have emphasised the need for diocesan bishops to adopt a more pastoral and collaborative leadership style and avoid a monarchical approach.

“The bishop is not the lord of the church, but the servant of the Lord, at the service of his community” Father Carlos María Galli, a Catholic University of Argentina professor, told synod participants and public members at a forum on October 9.

Isn't that just about what you'd expect from an academic talking to the Synod on Synodality? It's all about 'communidy' (as Jacinda used to say). We're all bishops now!  

Gower's new book

 

As a reader of this blog comments, re +Gielen's email:

 

"Are we expected to believe Bishop Gielen took the devastating action to close FSSR on a report he has not seen?  Are we expected to believe the implication that Bishop Gielen doesn't even know what the charges are against FSSR?"

"it was Bishop Michael’s duty to seek guidance from Rome". No!  It is his duty to provide leadership in a fair, just and Catholic manner.  He continues to do the opposite.

 

Under the circumstances we cannot "trust the Church’s guidance".

 

I hope LMSNZ will go back to Bishop Gielen and tell him to show leadership and respond properly, in a manner that restores "trust [in] the Church’s guidance" .  He and Rome are making a fool of Christ and His Church.

 

Pray and God help us.

And another reader states that, 

It appears that the Church has reached a point where secret accusations lead to secret investigations by the authorities, who make secret dossiers containing secret findings, where the punishments they recommend are then publicly applied.  

Looks like we skipped the Soviet show trials. But maybe the order of events has been shuffled and that's next." 

Gower's book comes with the blessing of the socialists at RNZ. Of course

So here is +Gielen's reply to the protest made by the Latin Mass Society of New Zealand: 

 

Dear Peter

 

Thank you for your email to Bishop Michael Gielen on behalf of those listed in your email.  Bishop Michael has read your email. 

 

It's nice not to have to take it for granted that a bishop would read an email from the Latin Mass Society of New Zealand.  

 

As you will appreciate the Bishop has received significant correspondence (sic) regarding this matter. Through the Bishops office he has dedicated significant extra resourcing to ensure correspondents were responded to.   Hopefully, you will appreciate in responding he has been limited with what can be stated, out of respect for the present canonical proceedings, as well as the privacy and confidentiality of all people and matters involved.

 

 There was quite a process leading up to the sanctions imposed by Bishop Michael. 

 

There we all were, imagining those sanctions were imposed by the Vatican ... 

  

When the exposé first appeared on ”Paddy Gower Has Issues” it was, obviously, a concern for the wider Church and faithful of our Diocese, not just those in the Latin Mass Community in Christchurch.  

 

It was not an 'exposé'. An expose  reveals facts, not insinuations, gossip and innuendo. 

 

The Media exposé raised serious allegations from a number of ex-members regarding the Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer. These matters received significant national media coverage, online and through nationally televised news agencies.

 

They had significant national media coverage because they brought the Catholic Church into disrepute - once more. And allegations of unlawful exorcisms make such a refreshing change for the public, sated as they are with revelations of sexual abuse and sodomy in the Church. 

 

Following such allegations it was Bishop Michael’s duty to seek guidance from Rome. 

 

Why is it the 'duty' of a bishop to go running to Rome for 'guidance'? A bishop is ordained to govern his diocese, not to hide behind the skirts of the Vatican, especially not the post-conciliar, Novus Ordo, synodal Vatican of Francis church.  Furthermore, it was obviously not 'guidance' he sought but the diktat he duly received.

Rome appointed an Apostolic Visitation to independently look at the situation here in Christchurch. 

The Visitator was a respected retired bishop from Australia with canon lawyer expertise who specialises in Religious Institutes. 

 

The report of this Visitation was a confidential report sent directly to the Dicastery in Rome. Bishop Michael has never read the report.

This, we take it, is +Gielen's means of exonerating himself from any blame for banishment of the FSSR. He'd rather not know the contents of the report, lest his conscience might forbid him to obey its conclusions. 

Some time later the Dicastery in Rome sent its final recommendations to Bishop Michael, who duly followed their guidance. 

 

Through all correspondence Bishop Michael asked all petitioners to pray on this matter and trust the Church’s guidance. 

 

Why would any faithful Catholic trust a Church which elevates a publicly-known sodomite sympathiser like Fr Timothy Radcliffe O P to the cardinalate? 

Fake pope, fake cardinal, fake faith 

 

Bishop Michael did not make his decisions lightly and wanted the Latin Mass Community to still have a Mass in the extraordinary rite available to them on a Sunday.  This he has organized for 11am on Sundays in Kaiapoi. 

 

Bishop Gielen (this blog does not subscribe to the palsy-walsy Novus Ordo conceit of calling prelates and priests by their Christian name which is only a vain attempt to wish away the elevated status of the priesthood) may not realise, as a Novus Ordo celebrant himself, the love for the Traditional Latin Mass and the faith it imbues which impels TLM Massgoers to attend Holy Eucharist daily, if possible. One Sunday Mass 'in the extraordinary rite' (sic - note no caps) is but pitiful compensation.

Fr Isaiah from the Community of the Beatitudes has been celebrating these Masses and is available for other Sacraments as needed.  Reconciliation is available daily in most parish churches in the diocese. 

But what faithful adherent of the Mass of Ages would seek 'Reconciliation' from a Novus Ordo priest? Only if they were in mortal sin and realising the danger of hell's fire which judging by the numbers at 'Reconciliation' , the Ape church of Francis has forgotten.  

 

It is an unsettling time for all those involved,

 ... it is a terrible time for the Sons, for the Daughters and the Oratory community, deprived as they are by their own bishop of daily Mass and spiritual guidance ...                                                 t

and the FSSR clergy have every right to appeal the decision to Rome.  Bishop Michael is following this process also and awaits further guidance from Rome as to the outcome of the appeals.

 

In the meantime, we ask that people continue to pray and keep all parties in their prayers.

 

Wishing you a blessed day.

 

Christine Reed Administration Assistant

D: 03 378 3647

391 Moorhouse Ave, PO Box 4544, Christchurch, New Zealand 03 366 9869 | cdoc.nz

The Transverberation of St Teresa
(Bernini)

 “Let us do our part, and God will then do what He wills. This is God’s cause, and all will end well. My hope is in Him; do not be distressed”

- St Teresa of Jesus 

WILLIAM SHOULD HOST ARDERN AT HMP BELMARSH

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB Messenger or X (Twitter).

Ardern goes la-di-dah at Windsor Castle

All normies are sickened just by the sight of Jacinda Ardern and the heir apparent to the British throne making her a Dame Grand Companion is enough to enrage any decent-minded Kiwi. Has His Royal Highness any idea of the insult to his future subjects? Some wag on Twitter says HMP Belmarsh would be more appropriate for Ardern than Windsor Castle.

New Zealand can't let her go gallivanting all over the world stage (except here, note, where she dare not show herself) without protest. The rest of the planet might adore her - as NZ did too, once, don't forget - but we're not letting her off. Not just for the treason of inflicting disease and death by her tinny jab and illegal lockdowns but worse still, for the thousands of unborn citizens murdered in their mother's womb per kind favour of her Abortion Law Act, March 2021.

Next thing she'll be partying up in Rome with the fraudulent 'Pope Francis', her collaborator and Marxist globalist fellow-traveller, who collaborated in coercing millions of Catholics to take the jab as "an act of love". A true pope would advise her to repent - and her victims to forgive. "From our hearts" (Mt 18,35).

Why did her appearance change so drastically?

Reproduced below is a selection of recent tweets on Catholic Twitter on the subject of The Jab and The Lockdowns. None gives any of the heart-rending revelations of vaccine damage which we're mostly heard by now; they're reflecting on the damage Ardern and Co inflicted on their lives and livelihoods. 

Sorry about the obscenities but they're endemic on social media. Blame them on the state of education - or the lack of it - in the land of the Wrong White Crowd - "wrong" because our predominantly European Government by obliterating God has lost all sense of right.

On average, only 15% of people refused the COVID vaccine. 15% who had the courage to stand firm, think for themselves, and say f***k no!  

That 15% showed real strength and conviction, staying true to their values!

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: I f***king admire the unvaccinated!

 

You’re the most courageous group of individuals. You held the line against a $1 trillion propaganda machine, and you told your family, your boss, and the government to f***k off! Be proud, my friend—you stood your ground like a f***king warrior.

There are still people out of work because they refused the Covid vax. I can see it ultimately leading to a class action against her and others in her Government & the NZ Health Department.

 

Don’t ever let those brain-dead zombies downplay your efforts with “I was forced, not everyone has a choice.” Some chose to comply, and some stood firm!

When the COVID pandemic hit, I lost my house, car, savings, and the skincare business I spent 10 years building day and night, which generated 1.2-1.8 million a year! A decade of relentless hard work, sacrifice, and dedication vanished overnight. But despite losing everything, I never compromised my principles, values or integrity. That was the price I paid to stay true to myself!

 

I don’t give a flying f***k if you took the vaccine to avoid arguments with family, societal pressure, to keep your stupid f***king job, or for a donut—you sold your soul. You had a price tag, and you sold yourself for that price!

If your price isn’t death, you’re for sale.

The unvaccinated lost everything, but we kept our honor, courage, and self-respect. That’s why I trust the unvaccinated—because when history inevitably repeats itself, I know they’ll stand by me, unwavering, no matter what the government demands.

I was a first line healthcare worker who was unlawfully terminated because I saw during the second pandemic what those experimental COVID shots was doing to patients. No one really stood up for the unvaccinated when we were unlawfully terminated. My life was put in turmoil because the sheep didn’t stand with us and complied.

 

The healthcare professionals who hold a licence and were mandated who took that shot now want to get on social media and start crying about their illnesses. f***k them! They should have stood up instead of standing down. How many lives could have been saved if the healthcare workers that worked in the hospital, especially in the emergency room, stood together.

 

Instead, these people treated the unvaccinated healthcare workers like we were the disease. The grimy sh*t that they let go on toward the unvaccinated was disgusting and disgraceful.

 

Spent 8 months on an illegal “unpaid leave” from my company… Do not regret a second of it. I only wish that more people understood what a complete travesty that whole scam was…

 

 

I don't think most people realize how hard a choice it really was. I am UnTested as well as UnVaxxed! Not many people can say they are Untested and Unvaxxed.

 

I almost lost my 33 year career if the SCOTUS had not eliminated the mandate just 3 days prior to the mandate taking effect. Since then, my career has still gone down the drain, though. I am in a commission-only job where nearly all my referral sources turned their backs on me because of my stance. It sucks when doing the right thing is punished as I have been.

 

My husband and I both lost our jobs refusing. I can’t tell you how stressful that was. Every cell in my body told me not to comply. I’ve walked away from nursing….so very disgusted and disappointed.

Our family (21 of us) was an unvaccinated island in an ocean of vaccinated sheep. We stood together. We challenged the school board, held our own worship service, did our own child Baptism. We did not bend or bow at the altar of COVID.

If you're told, take the jab or lose your job, is NOT voluntary. People have to work to support their families and pay bills!

That is not a choice.

They were coerced into doing something against their moral compass. I refused to take it. I refuse to take anything that I had to be bribed, coerced, threatened and bullied into!! Those are NOT choices. It’s BLACK MAIL.

 

No. Properly speaking it's coercion, as this tweet has already stated. Coercion involves force, whether physical, mental or spiritual (the latter being employed, to their everlasting shame, by the hierarchy and priests of the Catholic Church). Blackmail involves threats to reveal secret, compromising information known to the blackmailer.  

I was blessed to be able to take the hit on my business (cut my income just under half for the first two years; almost back to full speed ahead), but I chose not to take the jab because I honestly felt they had not done nearly enough research on the "vaccine".

 

Add to that, most of the reports/studies/findings I read during the first year of the covid claims had me convinced that the odds were very much in my favor to weather covid, should I get it, than to chance an upcoming "vaccine" that simply proved vastly unproven.

 

As far as the social impact is concerned, I was barely touched as my interests, for the most part, have always leaned towards solitary endeavors when not required to work in/near the public sphere; I enjoy hiking, camping, and playing my guitar and piano.

The most difficult aspect for me was, indeed, the psychological/sociological aspect that really showed me a country I really didn't know existed; people willing to have the powers of the state used to do harm to people that did not agree to be guinea pigs for the rampant greed of drug companies and politicians of any ilk.

 

I don't see my refusal to willingly take "the jab" as a badge of courage of any sort, but I do see my wilful decision to not do so as a doggedly studied and thoughtful choice; I've yet to regret making that choice.

 

 

Parable of the Wicked Servant (Domenico Fetti)

And his lord being angry, delivered him to the torturers until he paid all the debt. So also shall my heavenly Father do to you, if you forgive not every one his brother from your hearts

- Gospel, 21st Sunday after Pentecost