To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address FB or X,
No, this is not AI talking. We all wish it were but in fact it's the man who's meant to be leading the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. Instead, by lumping in Latter Day Saints, universalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Uncle Tom Cobley and all with faithful Catholics, Robert Prevost (aka 'Pope Leo XIV') intends to dissolve the Mystical Body of Christ and nullify the Sacraments by inclusion of the phony imitations of other heretical sects.
Next thing, Prevost - who by this one heretical declaration reveals himself definitively to be more of an antichrist than a pope - will be endorsing Islam as a "fellow Abrahamic faith" and at his bidding weak-minded, ill-informed Novus Ordo-ites will be reciting the Shahada.
For an arch-Modernist like Prevost this is entirely predictable, but now he's gone too far. Abused and persecuted Catholics have had enough and the worm is turning. It may help them to know that very likely Prevost is a puppet, elected by the machinations of Latin Mass abolitionist Cardinal Blase Cupich, who like +Leo and the satanic Cardinal Joseph Bernardin is a denizen of Chicago.
These evil men have a plan. Their aim is to legitimise sodomy and demolish the priesthood by blending Catholicism with heretical sects. Their ultimate target is Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in the Holy Eucharist.
 |
| self-explanatory |
Pope Leo XIV has concluded the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity by declaring that different Christian faiths are already “one.”
“We are one! We already are! Let us recognize it, experience it and make it visible!” Leo said in his Sunday homily on the Feast of the Conversion of St. Paul at the Basilica of St. Paul outside the Walls in Rome.
As Vatican News put it, he stressed how “different Christian religions share the same faith.” His remarks were addressed to clergymen of schismatic and heretical churches, including the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the Armenian Apostolic Church, and the Anglican Communion.
Leo’s claim directly contradicts Catholic teaching as laid out in the Catechism of St. Pius X, according to which the Church is united by the “same faith,” “same worship,” “same law” “and in participation of the same Sacraments, under the same visible Head, the Roman Pontiff.”
Therefore, schismatic churches that reject the authority of the pope, such as Eastern Orthodox churches, and heretical sects such as the Anglican Communion cannot be said to be unified, or “one,” with the Catholic Church.
The Catechism of the Council of Trent affirms, “It is the unanimous teaching of the Fathers that this visible head is necessary to establish and preserve unity in the Church.”
Likewise, in the encyclical Satis Cognitum, promulgated on June 29, 1896, Leo XIII taught that Christian unity is grounded in shared faith, the sacraments, and governance. The document explicitly rejected the idea of an invisible or merely spiritual Church and affirmed that full unity requires adherence to the authority established by Christ in the Catholic Church.
In his Sunday homily, Leo XIV also invoked Pope Francis’ claim that the “synodal” path of the Catholic Church “is and must be ecumenical, just as the ecumenical journey is synodal.”
“As we look toward the 2,000th anniversary of the Passion, Death and Resurrection of the Lord Jesus in 2033, let us commit ourselves to further developing ecumenical synodal practices and to sharing with one another who we are, what we do and what we teach,” Leo said.https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-leo-says-different-christian-faiths-are-already-one/?utm_source=twittercath
'Cardinal' 'Tucho' Fernandez: notice the satanic Bernardin cross. They're not bothering to hide it any more
And now from former Navy (O6) Captain/Chaplain, seminary instructor, and diocesan Respect Life Director Gene Thomas Gomulka - a man who generally knows what's what:
Pope Paul VI reigned for fifteen years from 1963 to 1978. Toward the end of his pontificate, owing to his failing health, certain cardinals in the Roman Curia took over many of his responsibilities. Hoping to hold on to their power, they succeeded in securing the election of Venetian Cardinal Albino Luciani, Pope John Paul I, whom they perceived as a weak, docile, and controllable candidate.
The Curia cardinals quickly discovered that they may have greatly underestimated the new pope when he began inquiring about the workings of the Vatican Bank which owned many shares in the failed Banco Ambrosiano. According to confidential sources, certain Curia cardinals were very disrespectful toward him and did not wish to relinquish the power they achieved under Paul VI.
Feeling emotionally isolated and under a lot of stress, Pope John Paul I, who had prior circulatory issues, died after only 33 days in office. While my inside Vatican sources do not believe the pope was murdered, they do believe power–hungry Curia cardinals contributed to his heart attack.
After having covered the election of Pope John Paul I in Rome as an accredited member of the press, and after being invited by Pope John Paul II (whom I befriended before his papal election) to distribute Communion at his inauguration Mass in St. Peter’s Square on October 22, 1978, I have my own interpretation of the election of Pope Leo XIV.
Just as most bishops, priests, and many seminarians knew that Cardinal Theodore “Uncle Ted” McCarrick was a homosexual predator who abused countless seminarians and young priests, so too did U.S. and European clergy know that Pope Francis, like most of them, was also homosexual.
|
| self-explanatory |
Unlike homosexual popes, straight popes and bishops do not surround themselves with known homosexuals like Cardinal “Tucho” Fernádez, Monsignor Battista Ricca, and several other gay clerics. Straight bishops like retired Dublin Archbishop Diarmuid Martin are also far less inclined to underreport or cover up abuse as Pope Francis is documented to have done in Argentina, and as Pope Leo XIV is also reported to have done in Peru.
During his 12-year pontificate, Pope Francis appointed 108 of the 133 cardinals who took part in the last papal conclave. Because most of the electors were homosexuals like Francis, one would expect them to elect a fellow homosexual like Leo.
Recall what happened in the 16th century when straight St. Pope Pius V (1556–1572) was elected following the pontificates of gay popes Leo X (1513-1521) and Julius III (1550-1555). Pius never would have been elected were it not for a large number of straight cardinal electors at the papal conclave in 1556. The presence of heterosexual electors is supported by the fact that Pius V was followed by Pope Gregory XIII (1572-85) who was reported for having had an affair that resulted in the birth of Giacomo Boncompagni in 1548.
Why was Robert Prevost promoted?
My view of the election of Robert Prevost as the first American-born pope differs considerably from that of most Catholics and journalists. To appreciate how Prevost was elected, one has to go back in time to the November 2018 meeting of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB).
When lay Catholics were pushing for the bishops to create a lay body similar to the National Review Board to investigate bishops who engage in and cover up abuse, it was not the USCCB President, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, but Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich who addressed the bishops, telling them that Pope Francis wanted them to table the vote on the creation of a lay investigatory body, as the Pope wanted to address the problem on the international level at a February 2019 Summit in the Vatican.
It was also reported that the February 1, 2025, letter from Pope Francis to the U.S. Bishops criticizing President Donald Trump’s immigration policy was not composed in the Vatican, but originated in the chancery office of the Chicago Archdiocese.
Even though the majority of U.S. Catholics oppose illegal immigration and support efforts by President Trump to curb the flow of fentynal into the country, cardinals like Blase Cupich, Robert McElroy, and Joseph Tobin, known by Catholic bishops and priests to be homosexually oriented, recently issued a statement critical of our country’s foreign policy toward countries like Venezuela, Ukraine, and Greenland - a statement they claimed was “inspired by Pope Leo.”
One may question if the criticism originated with Leo in the Vatican or, actually, in Chicago, Washington, and Newark.
The fix is in
I would argue that Francis and Cupich knew that Cupich was not electable. Being born, raised, and working in the militarily, financially, and politically powerful United States was not going to gain him the votes that someone from a far less affluent country might earn. Besides, if Cupich was neither liked by his fellow U.S. bishops, nor respected and loved by the clergy and laity of his own archdiocese, how could he endear himself to the approximately 1.406 billion Catholics worldwide?
Even though the election of Albino Luciani in 1978 didn’t work the way the manipulating cardinals had planned, it didn’t mean it could not succeed if tried again. But what “weak, docile, and controllable” cardinal might be elected who would allow himself to be just a figurehead of a pope while Cupich held the real power?
While almost all of the voting members of the College of Cardinals were beholden to Francis, they did not attribute their appointment to Cupich. This led Francis and Cupich to go to “Plan B,” which involved Cupich promoting a bishop to cardinal who would then be endorsed as Francis’ successor.
It seems to me that Pope Francis approved Cupich’s recommendation that the American-born Bishop of Chiclayo, Robert Prevost, born and raised in Chicago, be appointed the Prefect for the Dicastery for Bishops, a position that would lead him to be named a cardinal who could participate in the next papal election.
While Prevost knew Francis when they met and worked in South America, he knew that his appointment would never have been made without the endorsement of Cupich who himself served on the Dicastery for Bishops. Like many politicians controlled by billionaires who may have funded their election campaigns, so too was Prevost beholden to and controlled by Cupich, without whom he would still be back in his small Peruvian diocese.
 |
| Prevost wears the Bernardin cross too: 'weak, docile and controllable' |
It was no surprise that Cupich got himself appointed to the Pontifical Commission for Vatican City State which oversees the city-state’s government, security, and museums. Such a position can help cover up the fact that Cupich is the real Don of the Lavender Mafia controlling the Church.
While serving on the Dicastery for Bishops, Cupich has promoted several homosexual friends like New York Archbishop Ron Hicks, and he will now be promoting even more homosexuals, especially in Africa and Asia where many older straight cardinals and bishops opposed efforts to get Catholics to accept homosexual behavior with the promulgation of documents like Fiducia Supplicans.
As Pope Leo himself said in a September 2025 interview with Crux, the Catholic Church must “change attitudes before we ever change doctrine,” specifically regarding LGBTQ+ issues.
Slim chance of reversing decline
Based on Leo’s episcopal appointments and the positions he has taken on gays, lesbians, and transgenders; illegal immigration, the environment, and his failure to discipline over 160 bishops credibly accused of abusing children and vulnerable adults as documented by Bishop Accountability.org, one cannot expect him to deal with clerical sexual predation and homosexual misconduct or to support pro-family/pro-life Traditional Latin Mass families like Pope John Paul I might have cleaned up the Vatican’s financial corruption had he not suffered a premature death.
As long as homosexual popes like Leo and cardinals like Cupich continue making more homosexual cardinal electors and bishops, the chances are slim to none that a straight pope like St. Pius V may be elected, thereby reversing the ongoing decline in priestly and religious vocations and in church membership outside of Africa.
Gene Thomas Gomulka from Gene Thomas Gomulka of John 18:37 <johneighteenthirtyseven@substack.com>.
Gene Thomas Gomulka is a sexual abuse victims’ advocate, investigative reporter, and screenwriter. A former Navy (O6) Captain/Chaplain, seminary instructor, and diocesan Respect Life Director, Gomulka was ordained a priest for the Altoona-Johnstown diocese and later made a Prelate of Honor (Monsignor) by St. John Paul II. Email him at msgr.investigations@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment