PELOSI, FRANCIS, COMMUNION, SIN: JOIN THE DOTS

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB or Messenger.

What's the bit about Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden receiving Holy Communion from 'Pope Francis' that Novus Ordo Catholics don't understand? 

Do they not understand that Pelosi and Biden are babykillers on the grandest scale? Do they not understand that the Catholic Church teaches abortion is a mortal sin, and that people in a state of mortal sin must not receive Communion? 

Do they not understand that the pope is the chief shepherd of  Christ's flock who must guide us along the right paths? 

If they get that much, then they must get that 'Pope Francis' is guiding the flock along seriously wrong paths. So why don't they get that 'Pope Francis' is himself seriously wrong?

"Judge not," is what the Novus Ordo-ite is highly likely to say, sententiously. He or she isn't getting the difference between judging a person and judging what that person does. The difference between the 'act' and the 'actor' if you like. 

But judge thy neighbour according to justice (Lev 19:15. .Jesus Himself requires us to judge. He says: “When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, ‘It’s going to rain,’ and it does. And when the south wind blows, you say, ‘It’s going to be hot,’ and it is. Hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of the earth and the sky. How is it that you don’t know how to interpret this present time? Why don’t you judge for yourselves what is right?” (Luke 12:54-57). 

Echoing Jesus, the writer of Hebrews says: “Someone who lives on milk is still an infant and doesn’t know how to do what is right. Solid food is for those who are mature, who through training have the skill to recognize the difference between right and wrong.” (Hebrews 5:13-14).

In the same Matthew 7 where He says: “Judge not,” He also says: “Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine.” (Matthew 7:6). We cannot identify “dogs” without judging. Neither can we determine “swine” without judgment.

Jesus then goes on to say: “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits.” (Matthew 7:15-16). If we are to identify false prophets by their fruits, we cannot do otherwise than judging them. Jesus’ concern becomes apparent when He says: “Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.” (John 7:24). This shows Jesus wants us to judge, but we must judge righteously. The Law of Moses says: “In righteousness, you shall judge your neighbour.” Leviticus 19:16).

Righteous judgment means not judging according to the flesh, but according to the spirit. (John 8:15). It means we judge the fruit and not the motive. We do not have the capability to judge the heart of others or their intentions. Only God can read the heart and discern the motives of men. Therefore, we must not arrogate to ourselves the judgment that only God can make.

Righteous judgment also means not being respectful of persons. Accordingly, James warns: “Do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with partiality. For if there should come into your assembly a man with gold rings, in fine apparel, and there should also come in a poor man in filthy clothes, and you pay attention to the one wearing the fine clothes and say to him, “You sit here in a good place,” and say to the poor man, “You stand there,” or, “Sit here at my footstool,” have you not shown partiality among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?” (James 2:1-4). 

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2021/08/christians-are-called-to-judge-1/#:~:text=Righteous%20judgment%20also,Hypocritical%20judgment

St James warns us here that we must not be "partial" by judging a man in fine apparel differently from one in filthy clothes. A so-called pope wears rather fine apparel but St James is telling us to judge a pope by the same scriptural standards that we must use to judge anyone else. We must have respect for his office as a priest - and confess that on this page we've sometimes been lacking in that department somewhat, and there's no denying Bergoglio is a priest, although a Jesuit (it once was the highest compliment one could pay a priest, to call him a Jesuit). 

So will the Novus Ordo-ite understand this much? Probably. Will he/she then judge 'Pope Francis', in giving Communion to Nancy Pelosi who going by her actions is a notorious public sinner, as being objectively (not knowing his motivation) in a state of serious sin himself?

Probably not. Acknowledging that 'Pope Francis' is a public sinner would imply a need to change. To convert. And that's hard. It means finding "the narrow door" that Jesus tells us is the one which leads to life.

Nancy Pelosi has reportedly received Holy Communion at a Mass in the Vatican.

On Wednesday, the US House Speaker met with Pope Francis and received Holy Communion during a papal Mass in St. Peter's Basilica, according to the Associated Press.

 

Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone - the name means 'lion-hearted'

This grave offense comes after San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone barred Pelosi from receiving Holy Communion last month, saying "After numerous attempts to speak with Speaker Pelosi to help her understand the grave evil she is perpetrating, the scandal she is causing and the danger to her own soul she is risking, I have determined that she is not to be admitted to Holy Communion."

The Democrat leader attended the pope's Mass on the Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul while she was vacationing with family in Rome.

She sat in a VIP diplomatic section of the Basilica and two eyewitnesses reported the leftist politician having received Holy Communion during that Mass.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Roe v Wade, which walked back abortion being a constitutional right, Pelosi called the court's decision "outrageous and heart-wrenching."

"What this means to women is such an insult. It's a slap in the face to women about using their own judgment to make their own decisions about their reproductive freedom," the California Democrat opined.

 

Pelosi has not adhered to +Cordileone's directives, which incentivized her to reconsider her decades-long support for abortion — or at least stop masquerading as a practising Catholic.

"A woman's right to choose — reproductive freedom — is on the ballot in November," she added.

Papal Complicity in Grave Sin?

Pope Francis has been silent on the glaring issue of fake Catholic politicians receiving Holy Communion while they publicly and passionately live a mortally sinful lifestyle.

Last year, the pontiff met with fake Catholic President Joe Biden.

Biden, an abortion advocate, told the Associated Press Francis called him a "good Catholic" and encouraged him to keep receiving Holy Communion.

"We just talked about the fact he was happy that I was a good Catholic and I should keep receiving Communion," Biden alleged.

While the Vatican has yet to explicitly condemn individual "Catholic" politicians for their sinful beliefs, in 2004, the then-head of the Vatican's doctrinal office, Cdl. Joseph Ratzinger, wrote about denying politicians Holy Communion.

The future Pope Benedict XVI penned a confidential letter to US bishops that stated priests "must" deny Holy Communion to pro-abortion politicians.

At the time, the Democrat nominee for president, John Kerry, an abortion advocate, was on the campaign trail claiming to be Catholic. Few US bishops took any concrete action against Kerry, despite Ratzinger's letter urging them to do so.

Clear Instruction

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) and Sacred Scripture clearly outline the sinful nature of abortion and who is worthy of receiving the Holy Eucharist.

"Since the first century, the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law," paragraph 2271 of the CCC reads.

In paragraph 2273, the CCC explicitly condemns any legislation that "deprives a category of human beings of the protection which civil legislation ought to accord them," explaining the state is then "denying the equality of all before the law."

In 1 Corinthians 11:27, 29 St. Paul makes it clear that those who unworthily receive Holy Communion, either in disbelief or in a state of mortal sin, will bring judgment upon themselves: "Therefore, whosoever shall eat this bread or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily shall be guilty of the Body and of the Blood of the Lord. ... For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the Body of the Lord."

Exasperation

Because the Church's teaching is so well-defined and rooted in Holy Scripture, many Catholics have expressed frustration with dissident Catholic celebrities and politicians for being allowed by bishops to publicly live contrary to Church teaching.

"Pelosi waiting in line to receive Communion is akin to a murderer waiting in line to pay his respects to his victim," remarked Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League.

CatholicVote, a pro-life super PAC, also condemned Pelosi's actions.

"Shameful. Demoralizing. And a scandal. The most prominent advocate in the United States for killing unborn children should not receive Communion in the Catholic Church, period," the group tweeted.https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pelosi-disrespects-canon-law

 

  How narrow is the gate, and strait is the way that leadeth to life: and few there are that find it! - Mt 7:14

 

St Paul
Rembrandt van Rijn


St Paul, on your feast day please pray for the Church

ONLY ON

premium

ONLY ON

premium

ONLY ON

premium

 

Top of Form

 

 

 

 

 

ABOUT

 

GOOD LORDE! MSM GET MAD, BISHOPS GO SHTUM

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB or Messenger.

Oh the howls of unrighteous anger about 'the right to abortion' following the reversal of Roe v Wade! Even Lorde, for heaven's sake. A Kiwi - in England - her profound observation on that ruling in the US was: "F-k the Supreme Court!" 

Lorde gets a bit carried away in Glastonbury

Good Lorde. Or bad Lorde, one might think, by the evidence. She set the tone for the debate. Simon O'Connor (is he by any chance related to Yelich-O'Connor - Lorde's real name?), who should be leader of the National Party, got rapped over the knuckles by Humpty Dumpty Luxon who shouldn't be, for saying on FB that the Roe v Wade reversal was "a good day". It was a superb day! Deo gratias!

And the mainstream media abortion propaganda has to be heard to be believed. Any space given to the voice of reason has escaped us. TvOne 'News' allowed us a brief glimpse of Voice for Life's Kate Cormack, and that was all. Can't these so-called journos READ? Are they deaf as well as blind? (Well yes they are, spiritually speaking.)

 

In a 6-3 decision the court declared on Friday:

The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.After 49 years, SCOTUS strikes down Roe v Wade | MercatorNet 

What's not clear here??? American women never had a 'right' to abortion! No woman EVER has a right to kill anyone else, and especially she does not have a right to kill her own child. 

We know by now not to expect anything better from NZ's media. They're never going to bite the hand that feeds them, and that hand is Jacinda Ardern's. Ardern was architect of Abortion Law Act, just about the most deadly legislation of any in the world, and she pays the media millions of $$$ to say what she wants them to say - for example, that she was "incredibly upset" to hear of the US Justices' decision.

 "Watching the removal of a woman's fundamental right to make decisions over their own body is incredibly upsetting,"

Ardern can't read either. Women never had that 'fundamental right'. Ardern fervently believes the adage about repeatng a lie repeatedly is the best way to get people to believe it.

"People are absolutely entitled to have deeply held convictions on this issue".

Oh, Ardern's so empathetic. No wonder so many women voted for her. Not many will vote for her again.    

"But those personal beliefs should never rob another from making their own decisions." https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/469759/loss-for-women-everywhere-ardern-on-roe-v-wade-decision

It is NOT a personal belief! It is a Commandment of God and of His Church - the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church - and the Roe v Wade decision has accordingly been greeted with thankfulness by the US Conference of Bishops. In New Zealand, not so much. In more than a few churches, anecdotal evidence suggests, the pagan Matariki was celebrated in so-called Catholic churches in this country last Sunday (most memorably in  Palmerston North's cathedral), but of the biggest victory for God in living memory, there was not a mention that we know of. Not even in the pathetically woke 'Prayers of the Faithful' which sound like they've been written not by the faithful but faithless, worldly bureaucrats in diocesan offices all over the country. That's the Novus Ordo effect.

The faithful have been silenced. Faithful traditional Catholics have been denied their rightful place at the national Synodal 'hui'. Simon O'Connor is forced to retract his Facebook post and one wonders how many Catholics, especially priests or religious, rushed to post comments in his support. Not a lot probably, and that's not because they've all been silenced by Facebook, like more than one reader of this blog - jailed for offending against FB's 'community standards'. (What 'standards'?) 

 

And then there's Family First. Deregistered. Today. Silenced - or so this totalitarian regime would like to think.

The Supreme Court in Wellington has just handed down their judgement in Attorney-General v Family First New Zealand, and the Government and the Charities Board have won the right to deregister Family First as a registered charity.
 
“This decision is a sad day for the freedom of speech and belief in New Zealand, and sets a disturbing precedent. The attempt – some would label it a ‘witch hunt’ - by the Charities Board to deregister Family First is a watershed decision, not just for Family First, but for the whole country,” says Bob McCoskrie, Chief Executive of Family First NZ.
 
“Family First has fought this attempt to deregister us through four court cases (2015, 2018, 2020 & 2022). It has cost hundreds of thousands of dollars for both the charity and the taxpayer because of the threat it placed on us and other charities and our collective freedom to speak on behalf of our supporters in a civil society.”
 
“An overly restrictive or narrow view of what is in the ‘public benefit’ is likely to be of concern to all charities, many of which have a certain emphasis or point of view. The importance of freedom of expression and open debate in a civil society are ideals every New Zealander should be defending.”
 
“It also appears that certain views of marriage and family are now deemed out-of-bounds by the State. Deregistration of Family First is a legal victory for those ideologues who want to take power away from the family and give it to the state.”
 
“If Family First is deemed to be non-charitable because of its advocacy and activity, the real question is whether the Government will pursue other charities who operate in a similar fashion and do political advocacy – and who Family First have possibly engaged with during social debates such as cannabis legalisation, but are from the left wing side of political discourse. Will they now be targeted?”
 
“The answer to that question will be obvious to those who understand the real agenda.”
 
“The good news is that Family First will not be silenced and will continue to represent and be a powerful voice and advocate for the thousands of families who support us. This decision today will only embolden us, because it reveals just how far the state is overreaching their control and power to attempt to shut down free speech and certain points of view that it doesn’t like.

DONATE TO FAMILY FIRST TODAY! No doubt the Catholic Church will show us the way, urging the faithful to support Bob McCoskrie's heroic witness to Christ in the community.  As the ad says: "Yeah right". The Catholic Church should remove its financial support from the shonky Caritas 'charity' which is not a charity at all, because it is linked to organisations which finance abortions, and donate to Family First instead. Forthwith.

National MP Simon O’Connor says he stands by his “pro-life” beliefs and a Facebook post about the Roe v Wade decision that landed him in hot water with his party’s leader.

The Tāmaki MP posted “today is a good day” on Saturday, following the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Roe v Wade ruling that provided a constitutional right to abortion.

The post was later deleted after National leader Christopher Luxon said it did not represent the values of the National Party.

But after two days of silence, O’Connor has told media he stands by the sentiment of the post people were distressed and it was important to pull that back,” he said, denying he had been “gagged” by party leadership. Hmmm.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/national-mp-simon-oconnor-speaks-about-removing-anti-abortion-social-media-post-at-chris-luxons-re

Let's now revisit the abortion issue. Please bear with us as you read the first of these two social media posts.

"I'm not pro-murdering babies.

I'm pro-Becky who found out at her 20-week anatomy scan that the infant she had been so excited to bring into this world had developed without life sustaining organs.

I'm pro-Susan who was sexually assaulted on her way home from work, only to come to the horrific realization that her assailant planted his seed in her when she got a positive pregnancy test result a month later.

I'm pro-Theresa who hemorrhaged due to a placental abruption, causing her parents, spouse, and children to have to make the impossible decision on whether to save her or her unborn child.

I'm pro-little Cathy who had her innocence ripped away from her by someone she should have been able to trust and her 11-year-old body isn't mature enough to bear the consequence of that betrayal.

I'm pro-Melissa who's working two jobs just to make ends meet and has to choose between bringing another child into poverty or feeding the children she already has because her spouse walked out on her.

I'm pro-Brittany who realizes that she is in no way financially, emotionally, or physically able to raise a child.

I'm pro-Emily who went through IVF, ending up with SIX viable implanted eggs requiring selective reduction to ensure the safety of her and a SAFE number of fetuses.

I'm pro-Jessica who is FINALLY getting the strength to get away from her physically abusive spouse only to find out that she is carrying the monster's child.

I'm pro-Vanessa who went into her confirmation appointment after YEARS of trying to conceive only to hear silence where there should be a heartbeat.

I'm pro-Lindsay who lost her virginity in her sophomore year with a broken condom and now has to choose whether to be a teenage mom or just a teenager.

I'm pro-Courtney who just found out she's already 13 weeks along, but the egg never made it out of her fallopian tube so either she terminates the pregnancy or risks dying from internal bleeding.

You can argue and say that I'm pro-choice all you want, but the truth is:

I'm pro-life.

Their lives.

Women's lives.

You don't get to pick and choose which scenarios should be accepted. It's not about which stories you don't agree with. It's about fighting for the women in the stories that you do agree with and the CHOICE that was made.

Women's rights are meant to protect ALL women, regardless of their situation!

Overturning Roe does not stop abortions, it stops SAFE abortions!

Abortion is healthcare."

 

Dr Ryan Borja Capitulo, self-professed LGBT

And now, from Dr Ryan Borja Capitulo’s wall:

"I am a board certified OB-GYN, medical educator and hospital adminstrator.

Becky does NOT need an abortion. Her fetus with fatal congenital anomalies can wait for spontaneous labor. No need to induce labor. Prenatal diagnosis is not 100% sure. I have seen erroneous test results in my practice.

Susan does not need an abortion. She needs to heal from the sexual assault. She needs assistance from medical and mental health professionals to recover from her horrendous experience. Her fetus should not be killed just because the father is a rapist.

Theresa’s emergency CS due to placental abruption is NOT abortion. It is a legitimate surgical procedure to manage the premature separation of the placenta. The ethical principle of double effect makes this medical management acceptable.

Little Cathy does not need an abortion. She needs to heal from this child sexual abuse. She needs assistance from pediatricians and child psychiatrists to recover from her terrible ordeal. Her fetus should not be killed just because the father is a child rapist. Moreover, induced abortion will further negatively impact Little Cathy’s psyche. I have managed abused girls who became pregnant. With support from family, health professionals and other concerned parties, the girls had unremarkable pregnancies and deliveries. The multidisciplinary team also assisted the girls in their recovery from the abuse.

Melissa does not need an abortion. A fetus should not be killed for reasons of finances and comfort. What will prevent Melissa from killing her older children if she cannot make ends meet?

Brittany does not need an abortion. The fetus should not be killed due to the irresponsible sexual behavior of the parents. She can opt for adoption.

Emily does not need an abortion. Sextuplet pregnancy is difficult but can be managed by specialists in Maternal and Fetal Medicine/Perinatologists. However, it should be noted that implanting 6 embryos is no longer recommended and not done anymore. The latest recommendation is to implant only 1 or 2 embryos.

Jessica does not need an abortion. She needs support. She can opt for adoption.

Vanessa needs a completion curettage to manage her early intrauterine fetal demise. This is NOT abortion because the fetus is dead already due to natural causes.

Lindsay does not need an abortion. The fetus should not be killed due to the irresponsible sexual behavior of the parents. She can opt for adoption.

Courtney does not need an abortion. She needs a salpingectomy or salpingotomy or salpingostomy to manage her ectopic pregnancy. This is NOT abortion.

PRO-LIFE means saving the lives of BOTH women AND their unborn children.

Regardless of the stories and scenarios, we should fight for the lives of all women and for the lives of all of their unborn children.

Abortion is NEVER safe because the fetus is killed!

Abortion is NOT healthcare!

Abortion is NOT a right!

In my 22 years of clinical practice as an OB-GYN, I can definitely say that there are NO situations or scenarios that warrant an abortion."

We are reminded of the late, much-lamented Professor Sir William Liley, "Father of Fetology" who campaigned so hard with the Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child against the abortion, who said exactly the same thing. Years later he took his own life, perhaps in despair at the legislation of abortion in 1977 and foresight of its tragic results. Please pray for his soul.  

For the full text of the SCOTUS decision go to: https://www.scribd.com/

 

 

PN IDOLATRY, +CULLINANE APPOINTED BY MASON

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB or Messenger. 

On the high altar at PN's Cathedral of the Holy Spirit this morning: the eyes of the gods

"Here. Read this. We have wiped out millions of people" - Cardinal Augustin Bea SJ, to Father Malachi Martin SJ, in the presence of the Holy Father Pope John XIII.

Cardinal Bea held in his hand the "Third Secret" of Fatima, requested by Our Lady to be read and published in 1960. Its full text has however been suppressed by the popes since then, to this day.

By "we" +Bea may be taken to mean the Church, and now, in 2022, we may understand the "millions" to mean the deaths predicted to result from the Covid vaccine ruthlessly promoted by Antipope Bergoglio - and going by the enthronement of the pagan gods of Matariki on the high altar of Palmerston North's cathedral today, millions of souls lost too.  

This quote of the world-renowned exorcist and aide to Pope John XIII, Fr Malachi Martin (on video), makes it only too clear why these popes suppressed Our Lady's Secret of Fatima. It was too horrible for John XIII, Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI to contemplate in regard to humanity, to say nothing of the Mystical Body of Christ. 

Antipope Bergoglio is a very different kettle of fish: he's not the pope; he serves Satan in the 'Great Reset' which is driven by Freemasonry. The risks of the mRNA Covid-19 vaccination he peddles to Catholics as 'an act of love' are shown by a new study endorsed by the WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION as heavily outweighing its benefits. https://expose-news.com/2022/06/23/w-h-o-study-risks-outweigh-benefits-covid-vaccination/?cmid=83d5e31b-e73d-4428-b570-c7ba0e8000b7&fbclid=IwAR0wyLBkw08WIEel7X0My0w_ALF5KJJ2_4B-KaLmIpwwmKo2eEx6qzrpPpQ

Scientists have discovered that a person is on average 339% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event such as cardiac arrest, stroke, or death due to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19. And there are literally hundreds of studies by highly qualified doctors, epidemiologists, data gurus etc that all say the same.

Two things. Number one, the Novus Ordo Missae (New Mass), celebrated in New Zealand and the world over since the Second Vatican Council, was composed by Monsignor Annibale Bugnini who is now proven to have been a Freemason, and as such automatically excommunicated by and from the Church. 

How does that make Novus Ordo Massgoers feel? Like perhaps that they should boycott the NO? Just maybe? That they should attend a Traditional Latin Mass instead, online if that's their only recourse (for example, if they live in Wellington Archdiocese or Palmerston North Diocese)? A reader of this blog points out that attending Mass online does not fulfill the Sunday obligation.  

Speaking of Palmerston North Diocese, number two: between 1972 and 1984 all the appointments to bishoprics throughout the world were made by one Cardinal Sebastiano Baggio, described by Fr Charles Murr in his new book Murder in the 33rd Degree as rumoured for many years to have been involved with Bugnini in Freemasonry. The rumours were so rife that, informed of them by Cardinals Dino Staffa and Silvio Oddi in 1975, Pope Paul VI appointed Cardinal Giovanni Benelli to investigate. 

+Bugnini had already been proven by Cardinal Dino Staffa, Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura (the Vatican's "Supreme Court") through his contacts at Interpol and in Italian government intelligence, to be a Freemason of the Italian Lodge and his exposure resulted in a posting as nuncio to Iran. (Pretty cushy punishment, perhaps because devised by fellow Masons.) 

Having confirmed that Bugnini was indeed a Freemason, +Benelli then suggested the pope authorise an investigation of the entire Curia, to be led by French Canadian Archbishop Edouard Gagnon. And what did Gagnon conclude, after years of research, was its gravest message for the Church? That all the world's bishops from 1972 to 1984 were appointed  by Cardinal Baggio, named on page 4 of his summation as a Mason. 

Most importantly for the faithful of PN Diocese, some of whom who at the cathedral Mass today were worshipping the pagan gods Matariki, is the fact that Bishop 'Emeritus' Peter Cullinane, who officially ran PN Diocese for 32 years and since the resignation of his successor +Charles Drennan, still lurks, exerting influence, 'catechising', writing at length for Cathnews, was appointed by +Baggio the Freemason.

We have long since made the observation on this page that "if it speaks like a Mason, writes like a Mason and dresses like a Mason (open-necked shirt, a tiny cross), it probably is a Mason."   

Murder in the 33^rd Degree, The Gagnon Investigation into Vatican Freemasonry.

It’s an extraordinary document. In it Father Murr, now 72, recounts his direct experience with the investigation Paul VI commissioned after his mysterious remarks about the ‘Smoke of Satan’ had electrified the world. Father Murr also recounts the odyssey that followed, together with key events and personalities connected to it. 

As for the dossier itself, its contents were shocking: “I knew very well what this morning meant to the great man seated next to me,” Fr. Murr writes of Gagnon’s first attempt at placing his dangerous dossier on the state of the Catholic Church’s central Roman government into pontifical custody. It was May 16, 1978.

“After years of intense labour, investigations, research, interviews, organizing and one-on-one encounters with hundreds of people, mostly men, mostly clerics – some, venerable saints and scholars; others, some of the craftiest demons walking the earth – Archbishop Edouard Gagnon now held concrete answers for Pope Paul’s enigmatic and disturbing rhetorical questions …Yes, the unassuming French Canadian had identified quite a number of those nefarious ‘cracks in the wall’ – the ones through which ‘the smoke of Satan had entered’, and was continuing to enter,’ the Temple of God.”

The contents amounted to a black hole of subversion perpetrated by clerical Freemasons – each appearing to have used his powers for treacherous purposes.

Sitting alone with Gagnon in the Pontiff’s private study, the Holy Father was quick to proceed to the bottom line: What among the many itemized therein did Gagnon regard as the most urgent danger to the Church?

Without hesitation, the archbishop replied at once: “Page four of the summation. Cardinal Sebastiano Baggio … A Freemason. A Freemason naming every new bishop in the world! And every new archbishop, given a metropolitan See, and many of them guaranteed a cardinal’s hat and a vote in the next papal election. Your Holiness will forgive me for saying this, but a Freemason is orchestrating the next conclave. And for all intents and purposes, Cardinal Baggio is naming your successor.”

Gagnon also identified Cardinal Baggio’s greatest promoter and political ally. None other than Paul VI’s Secretary of State Cardinal Jean Villot who’d been promoting Baggio to be named Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for Bishops.

Archbishop Gagnon also told the Holy Father that he had it on impeccable authority that Archbishop Annibale Bugnini was also a Freemason placed in charge of the Commission on Liturgical Reform overseeing changes to the Roman Rite Mass and other liturgical practices before and after Vatican II and who is still considered a dominant force in these efforts. By the time of Gagnon’s meeting with Pope Paul, however, Bugnini had already been banished from Rome and sent as a papal nuncio to Iran. https://catholicinsight.com/murder-in-the-33rd-degree-the-gagnon-investigation-into-vatican-freemasonry/

But wait, there's more. Interviewed for the Remnant by Australian Kathy Clubb, Father Murr explains that after the death of Paul VI in 1978 there were three strong contenders for the papacy: Cardinals Benetti, Siri - and Baggio which is hardly surprising seeing he'd appointed all those bishops, some of whom by then had become cardinals with voting rights in the conclave.

At a turning point, Cardinal Siri refused to give up his votes to Benelli. So in order to stop Baggio from winning, Benelli lent all his support to Luciani (Pope John Paul I), giving him the papacy.

And what really happened to Pope John Paul I? Father Murr tells us he asked Cardinal Benelli to be his Secretary of State. Benelli agreed on condition that John Paul personally sack Baggio - who agreed to see the Pope after first insolently refusing. 

The meeting took place in the evening - something unheard of in the Vatican. Swiss guards stationed at the door testified to hearing Baggio shout at the Pope during the interview and Baggio was in fact the last person to see the Pope alive. So although Baggio didn't lift a hand against the Pope, the stress heaped on John Paul during the disastrous meeting led to a heart attack. Thus the Freemason Baggio was indirectly responsible for the Pope's death - Interview with Fr Murr, the Remnant, May 31. 

A charitable reconstruction of events, if we may say so. We've read worse. 

  

An explainer from American blogger AnnBarnhardt:

 The goal and purpose of Freemasonry since its inception in London in ARSH 1717 (Barnhardt has a unique way of saying A D - ed) has been the elimination of the Papacy, and then establishment of a dual-pronged One World Government and tandem One World Religion marketed under the name “Humanism.” Freemasons fomented, subsidized and profiteered off of almost every war in the Christian West with the goal of eliminating all monarchies, with the Papacy as the target. American Revolution, French Revolution, Italian Revolution, WWI, WWII.

The Papacy, instituted by Christ and unchangeable, is an Absolute Monarchy. In fact, it is totally unique in that it is a juridical office, in the form of an elected Absolute Monarchy which enjoys a Supernatural negative protection, and is Canonically protected from coercion, bribery and even from the juridical substantial error of the Pope himself, as we are now watching unfold in real time.

Here is the quote from Antipope Bergoglio on the Masonic infiltrators’ intention to destroy the Papacy:

“The Vatican City State as a form of government, the Curia, whatever it is, is the last European court of an absolute monarchy. The last. The others are now constitutional monarchies, the court is diluted. Here there are still court structures that must fall,” he said.

 

“People want to reform. For example, the palace of Castel Gandolfo, which comes from a Roman emperor, restored in the Renaissance, today is no longer a papal palace, “The scheme of the court is what has to disappear. And this was requested by all the cardinals, well, most, thanks be to God,” Pope Francis (sic) said.

 

self-explanatory 

As has been documented in this space, the discussion of “fundamentally transforming” the Papacy into a “collegial, synodal, shared ministry” has been discussed openly and at length for over 50 years, with the Miller Dissertation being a compendium of the discussion – a Rosetta Stone, if you will.

At the heart of this drive has been Cardinal Walter Kasper, who became the de facto leader of the Sankt Gallen Mafia with the death on August 30, ARSH 2012 of Cardinal Carlo Martini, with Kasper being the openly-acknowledged “king maker” at the Cardinals' Retreat and faux-conclave held in the Sistine Chapel March 10-13, ARSH 2013.

Chapter 8 of the Miller dissertation opens with a quote from Walter Kasper: “The present crisis of the Papacy is one of legitimation.” As in, the Papacy is no longer tenable in the modern, democratoday it is a museum, it is all a museum,” he said.

 

Pope Francis (sic) said that it is not his reform, but something “the cardinals have requested.” “The scheme of the court is what has to disappear. And this was requested by all the cardinals, well, most, thanks be to God,” Pope Francis (sic) said.

As has been documented in this space, the discussion of “fundamentally transforming” the Papacy into a “collegial, synodal, shared ministry” has been discussed openly and at length for over 50 years, with the Miller Dissertation being a compendium of the discussion – a Rosetta Stone, if you will.

At the heart of this drive has been Cardinal Walter Kasper, who became the de facto leader of the Sankt Gallen Mafia with the death on August 30, ARSH 2012 of Cardinal Carlo Martini, with Kasper being the openly-acknowledged “king maker” at the Cardinals Retreat and faux-conclave held in the Sistine Chapel March 10-13, ARSH 2013.

Chapter 8 of the Miller dissertation opens with a quote from Walter Kasper: “The present crisis of the Papacy is one of legitimation.” As in, the Papacy is no longer tenable in the modern, democratized world, and must be radically changed. This radical change, which would involve the dissolution of the Petrine Office in favor of a shared Petrine ministry or function, is also necessary in order to appease all schismatics, with Lutherans first among them, but also Anglicans, and even the Eastern Orthodox. This quote from Kasper is from a chapter that Kasper wrote for a book of collected essays on the future of the Papacy which was the project of and edited by Joseph Ratzinger, and published under Ratzinger’s banner in ARSH 1978, called “Dienst an der Einheit”. If any one man can be called Antipope Bergoglio’s puppetmaster, it is, without question, Walter Kasper.

The odious sacrilegious sodomite Bobby Mickens reported openly on this. Papal resignation must become the expectation, the monarchical Papacy must be totally eliminated- according to the enemies of Jesus Christ and his Holy Church.

I would add at this point that Antipope Bergoglio has become a massive liability to his LuciferianMasonicSodomite handlers. He is widely seen as the protector and enabler of sodomite sex predators that he is, and has lost most of whatever good will he enjoyed previously.

Unless Pope Benedict XVI is acknowledged as the one and only living Pope and the See occupied by him and him alone since April ARSH 2005, Antipope Bergoglio will be told to “resign”, another invalid, faux-conclave will be called (because Canon 359 clearly states that it is ontologically impossible for a valid conclave to be called while the See is occupied, no matter what) and then say hello to Antipope Tagle.

 We have to get this right. Quickly.

St. Peter and all the Saintly Popes, pray for us.

St. Michael the Archangel, guardian angel of the Vicar of Christ, pray for us.

Our Lady, Mother of Priests, pray for us.

Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us.