ASTOUNDING VID CLIP ON RUSSIA'S CONSECRATION: BRACE FOR WAR

 To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address FB or Messenger.

"It won't be Pope John Paul II and it won't be the one after him, but the pope after that will be the one to consecrate Russia", according to Antonio Ruffini, visible stigmatist and prophet "worthy of belief".

Right, you say. 'Pope Francis' has succeeded in consecrating Russia where three of his predecessors failed.

Wrong.  Jorge Mario Bergoglio is an antipope. So he is not the pope. It will take a true pope to consecrate Russia and that won't happen till Russia invades Western Europe and the secret (the third secret of Fatima) is revealed. It is "sensational, extraordinary". 

A video clip recorded in 2012 has Fr Nicholas Gruner, world-famous "Fatima Priest" and founding director of the Fatima Centre and his close collaborator Fr Paul Kramer shedding new light for many on the vexed question of the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Right now, while Antipope Bergoglio's appalling charade on the Feast of the Annunciation is horribly fresh in our minds seems a good time to do a transcript of the clip which is in Spanish with English subtitles.

Fr Paul Kramer - in fear for his life, they say (See his book above)

Fr Nicholas Gruner, the "Fatima Priest"

                                       

"According to the prophecy of Antonio Ruffini, a man who had the visible stigmata, whose biography  was written by Fr Guiseppe Tomaselli, a priest of a high level of sanctity, it wouldn't be Pope John Paul II and it wouldn't be the one after him (Benedict XVI) but the pope after that who would be the one to consecrate Russia. 

People who study prophecy ask, but after this pope (JP II) dies, won't the next one be a bad one? An antipope?

If he's an antipope he's not the pope. It's got to be a true pope. There's going to be a false pope. 

 

Stigmatist and prophet  Antonio Ruffini

This man's (Antonio Ruffini's) prophecies are worth of belief. Pope Pius XII authorised the construction of a chapel on the spot where he received the stigmata. I think that very fact confers a certain degree of credibility on the prophecies of this man, who was quite a miracle worker and known for his prophecies, and revealed the most hidden things to people whch helped them save their souls. 

 

So according to that prophecy it will be the legitimate successor to Benedict XVI who will consecrate Russia. Considering Pope Benedict's age and considering the prophecies that the pope who precedes the one who will consecrate Russia may most likely not die of natural causes, it would appear that the time for the consecration of Russia is very near.

 

If Antonio Ruffini is correct then Benedict is the pope of the assassination and I think that Michel (Frere Michel de la Sainte Trinite, author of The Whole Truth about Fatima) is most likely correct when he says that we will not have the consecration until we have the secret fully released. 

Michel told me in 1985 that Our Lady was insulted by the Vatican's refusal to obey the command to release the secret in 1960, and God will not give us the grace of the consecration until reparation is made for that disobedience, and the only reparation that can be made that will make it up is the release of the secret. 

 

The secret will be a cleansing of the Church and it will stop the disaster of Vatican II in its tracks. It will also be a call to repentance as Fr Malachi Martin said. He read the secret, and he announced on public radio a year before he died that when the secret is revealed the churches will be full. People will be on their knees and there'll be long lines at confession. That cleansing will be pounding their breasts and begging God for mercy. 

 

The secret is about the pope and the bishops in the hierarchy. It's also about every member of the faithful as well, and it is sensational, it is extraordinary. It will affect the salvation of many souls, just releasing the secret alone and it will lead to the consecration after that.

 

I think Benedict might end up giving us the secret before he goes into hiding, before he is killed. 

 

My source in Fatima who was very much in contact with the Carmelite sisters in May 1991 said Sr Lucia had received a message from Our Lady that the secret will be revealed during the course of a major war. 

 

We know from prophecy that when some major catastrophic event strikes Iran that the third world war is very near, and in Sister Lucia's revelation you see from Our Lady that iin the course of a major world war the third secret will be revealed. And the reason John Paul II gave for not revealing the secret in Germany in 1980, six months before he was shot, was because he didn't want the Russians to make certain moves. But that excuse will be completely gone when they actually make those moves, and that's why it would seem that all this ties together:

 

• Russia invades Western Europe

 

• The Pope releases the secret

 

•  He goes into hiding and is killed 

 

• You have disaster for 2 and a half years or whatever 

 

• A new pope is elected who consecrates Russia. (And we all live happily ever after - ed.) 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXDnJr6FiIY Fr Gruner and Frere Michel on consecration of russia

A reader says to check the Fatima Centre channel for many other videos like this, including the entire question-and-answer session of this very same clip (which came to us from Argentina via Ann Barnhardt). 

 

V*X PROVED AS ONLY PLAUSIBLE CAUSE OF EXCESS DEATHS AND INJURIES

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB or Messenger.

It's hideous reading and obviously wasted on the wilfully blind and head-stuck-in-the-sand set. 

But New Zealanders inspired by February's Occupation of Parliament will now stand up and call out, first of all, our treasonous Prime Minister, henchmen Hipkins and Bloomfield, all of Parliament and the MSM who are primarily responsible for a tragedy we cannot yet measure.

The WHO criteria to confirm AEFI causality have been met! Covid-19 v*ccines are the only plausible cause for the excess death and injury count. The rollout must stop and assistance for the injured and families of the dead begin.

Kasey Turner, a UK AstraVeneca casualty

The photograph above shows 18-year-old Kasey Turner, Yorkshire, a paramedic who died two weeks after her AstraZeneca vaccination. A blood clot caused a 'thunder clap' headache, found by an inquest this week to be the result of a thrombosis (blood clot). Her inquest found doctors had "missed opportunities" to diagnose the fatal clot.

Just like New Zealand's medical fraternity refuse, by and large, to acknowledge the injuries and deaths caused by the infamous Pfizer vax bought by this Government at a reduced price after wiser nations like India rejected it as an experiment.

Scroll down to find the petition calling for the resignation of PM Jacinda Ardern and even though you may well prefer to call for her head in a basket, if you haven't already done so, please sign.

For the evidence on vax deaths and injuries overseas, read on:

 

Causality is defined as the relationship between two events, whereby the second outcome cannot occur without the input of the first. The current major question is whether or not the covid-19 vaccines are causing the unprecedented excess deaths and rates of severe illness being seen internationally. We must not get the answer wrong!

Humans are complex creatures and our health and health outcomes are multifactorial; conclusions of cause and effect from vaccination for individual cases can sometimes be hard to draw. In the Philippines the FDA Pharmacovigilance team have received reports of nearly 100,000 Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI), and just over 2,000 deaths up to the 20th of March 20221. These weekly reports continue to state in their conclusions that the majority of the observed AEFI are either mild or coincidental.

It is possible to draw conclusions of cause and effect with the examination of cases, data, and outcomes on a population basis.

Worldwide, doctors, insurance companies, researchers, and population scientists are raising the alarms over their observations of considerable excess deaths, and greatly increased incidence of illness particularly clotting-related, cardiovascular, strokes, neurological, autoimmune, and cancers, among others. Officially, some of these are attributed to covid-19, others to lockdowns, others to stress, and some are ignored.

Certainly, the numbers of excess deaths greatly exceed the number of deaths that can be attributed directly to Covid-19. Further, these deaths and illness and are being seen among age cohorts which have not seen much of a death or injury toll from natural covid infection.

Here is what Covid-19 attributed deaths vs excess deaths looks like in the Philippines, using Department of Health (DOH) official Covid-19 deaths, Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA) reported deaths, and 2021 forecast deaths (using 2015-2019 historical data). Excess deaths by far exceed reported covid-19 deaths.

The Philippines Center for Population and Development discussed the unprecedented occurrence of soaring deaths and plunging births in the Philippines in 2021, in their seminar May Konek Ba? Births, Deaths, and the Pandemic last 25th February 2022. They could not identify any clear cause for the massive demographic changes, vaguely referred to covid-19 and lockdowns, and ignored the fact that during the first year of lockdowns in 2020 no excess deaths were seen at all. When questioned if there was link with the vaccination rollout, they stated resolutely that there was not and that any apparent relationship was certainly both coincidental and spurious.

It is curious though, that the excess deaths started and increased as the vaccine doses rollout increased. The currently available reported death data is only relatively complete up to October 2021, which is before the all-out push to inject every person in the Philippines got underway. Another PSA update is due within the next few days and should include relatively complete November 2021 data for evaluation.

The Bradford Hill Criteria are an accepted set of 9 criteria for assessing causality of an association in epidemiology [McCullough discussed this towards the end of a recent presentation2]. In 2019 the WHO provided an updated criteria3 specifically for use in determining causality of AEFI from vaccines. They state “Causality assessment usually will not prove or disprove an association between an event and the immunization. It is meant to assist in determining the level of certainty of such an association.”

For population level assessment of causality they list 6 criteria, of which only the first Temporal Relationship criterion is absolutely essential. I list and discuss these, and would argue that all are abundantly met.

1. Temporal relationship. The vaccine exposure must precede the occurrence of the event. This is the most critical of the criteria. I would argue that based simply on temporal relationships as discussed below, cause could already be concluded.

   There is both a temporal relationship between the start of excess deaths in the Philippines and the start of vaccination rollout and there is a magnitude effect whereby the more vaccines are given the higher are the excess deaths being seen. The Philippines had no excess deaths in 2020 during the first year of the pandemic when the entire population were under strict lockdowns. There were also no excess deaths in January 2021 when no vaccines were being given. A small excess deaths was seen in February, coincidental with when the early and unofficial vaccinations started. From March, with the formal rollout, a monthly escalation in excess deaths is observed. The chart below shows the excess deaths plotted by month (October 2021 and onwards data is still incomplete), and compared to 2019 and 2020.

This is what the current vaccine rollout in the Philippines looks like. If the link between rollout and vaccine doses follows the apparent trending, the coming months’ death data is going to be devastating. Booster rollout started in November 2021.

Cumulative Vaccine Doses and Cumulative Excess Deaths follow a disturbingly parallel upwards trajectory.

Internationally we can also see that there is a temporal relationship between the receipt of vaccines and deaths / injuries. Below are two plots extracted from the US AE reporting system VAERS4. The top one shows a massive death signal for 2021 and into 2022, concurrent with the vaccine rollout, vs. all the previous death reports to that system since 1986.

The second plot show the temporality of the deaths in days post-vaccination. The majority of deaths are occurring primarily within 48 hours, and then further within the first two weeks. We cannot assess such temporality in the Philippines yet (though it is abundantly clear from individual cases described to our team) because the DOH, FDA, and PSA have not made this information available.

Strength of association. The association should meet statistical significance to show that it was not just a chance occurrence. I have not done statistical significance evaluation. However, when excess deaths increase from a variance of +/- a few percentage points in all available historical data up to +44% (average for Jan - September 2021) with 110% excess in September 2021 (2.1 x the expected deaths), significance is beyond question.

Dose-response relationship: increasing exposure increases the risk of the AEFI occurring. This is being observed internationally (no data to assess here yet, aside from anecdotal cases). AEFIs increase with each dose given.

Consistency of evidence: similar or the same results are seen in different settings. Yes! The same patterns and types of injuries and deaths are being seen worldwide.

Specificity: the vaccine is the only cause of the event that can be shown.

Yes! This is being widely seen. Deaths, new illness, sudden worsening of health conditions, all occurring shortly after vaccination with no other changes or possible causes, or rational logical explanations.

Biological plausibility and coherence: the association between the receipt of the vaccine and the adverse event should be plausible and should be consistent with the current knowledge of the biology of the vaccine and the adverse event.

C-19 Vaccines, although their full composition have yet to be disclosed, contain varying contents and concentration of active ingredients. Originally it was thought that the vaccine would stay at the injection site. This is now proved untrue; the vaccine rapidly spreads throughout the body following injection, and has been found in all tissue types examined.

The body of research explaining the concerns and consequences continues to grow exponentially. Just a few of the areas of concern and biological plausibility are touched on below.

Viral vector and mRNA vaccines are designed to co-opt the recipient’s own cells to make spike proteins. These coded spike proteins are not exactly the same as the natural viral spike proteins; they have been stabilized to help them evade immune detection and to persist in the body. Unfortunately it is now known that the spike proteins are the key viral component causing sickness / pathogenicity in the natural infection. Vaccine-induced spike protein levels are known to exceed spike protein levels seen in the natural infection. They may then be expected to cause even more damage than seen during a natural illness and its recovery.

Duration of spike protein production by the body is unknown. It has been observed as ongoing for as long as any research study has yet lasted (that was 3 months), to date. Of course, each subsequent dose of vaccine will boost spike protein production, and may be expected to enhance possible damage.

The spikes are implicated in abnormal blood clotting and bleeding disorders, which have been clearly and widely identified and recognized as AEFIs.

The vaccine recipient’s body produces spikes in an uncontrolled manner from whichever cells the vaccine coopted. Those cells, be they blood vessel, brain, liver, kidney, heart, ovaries, testes, have all become spike producers and by this action enemies of the immune system to be destroyed. Too bad if function is destroyed as well. Heart attacks, strokes, dementias, kidney, liver, and multi-organ failures are all described.

The vaccines contain adjuvants which can be toxic and cause immune over reaction, some contain lipid nano-particles with toxic and allergenic fats. Allergic reactions, and autoimmunity is described.

Changes in DNA repair and suppression of immune system surveillance have been linked with recurrence of latent infections, and recurrence of old and development of new cancers. Discussions of VAIDS (vaccine-induced immune deficiency syndrome) and immune ‘exhaustion’ have been increasingly appearing in literature.

Pfizers’ data release provided 9 pages of possible and plausible conditions to be looked out for. Their clinical trial data showed more deaths and illness in the vaccine group vs. their control group.

There absolutely is biological plausibility for the types of injuries, and causes of deaths being reported.

By my assessment, these criteria to determine causality are all met, the vaccines are clearly implicated in the democide now in progress.

National and Globalist Luxon are at the very least accessories after the fact to the offence of murder

 

Our World in Data reports that to date 10.77 Billion Doses of Covid-19 vaccine have been injected, with 64.2% of the world’s population having received at least 1 dose. If there are serious problems with these products (there are!), the future of the human race is at stake!

Shouldn’t the WHO be responsible to call this out already? When will our governments / authorities act? If they will not or cannot, we need to call this out and act!

1

https://www.fda.gov.ph/wp-content/

uploads/2022/03/Reports-of-suspected-adverse-reaction-to-COVID-19-vaccines-as-of-20-March-2022.pdf

2

Covid Under Question, 25th March 2022, Discussion on Bradford Hill Criteria applicability to C19 Vaccines: Dr Peter McCullough https://ruumble.com/vyb162-covid-under-question-dr-peter-mccullough.html

3

Causality assessment of an adverse event following immunization (AEFI): user manual for the revised WHO classification second edition, 2019 update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/publications/CausalityAssessmentAEFI_EN.pdf

4

www.openvaers.com

https://supersally.substack.com/p/the-who-criteria-to-confirm-aefi?r=l1r7e&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

"AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND" - ARDERN PUSHES PIDGIN-SPEAK

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address, FB or Messenger.

Prime Sinister Ardern: buttering up the Government's electorate

"She's as cunning as a Maori dog," commented a reader of this blog today, on FB.  She was, of course, referring to Prime Sinister Jacinda Ardern.

Someone said the comment could get her banned  She replied that it was meant as a compliment. It's not hard to be suspected of racism in New Zealand today. We seem to have lost our sense of humour.

Having Maori language foisted upon us on every side certainly makes it harder to avoid the former and retain the latter. Don Brash complains about Radio New Zealand as "a particularly egregious offender" (Amen!):

"Over the last few years and especially since the current Government was elected late in 2020, there has been an increasing trend to use the Maori language where there are perfectly acceptable English alternatives.

Radio New Zealand is a particularly egregious offender: even though the taxpayer has provided many millions of dollars to support Maori-language radio stations, and a Maori TV channel, those of us who speak not a word of the Maori language and have not the slightest interest in learning it are forced to listen to Maori words and phrases with no translation. 

 

self-explanatory

 

Mr Brash almost certainly doesn't watch TvOne 'News' (why on earth would anyone of any  intelligence who holds the remote?) or he'd cite that platform as being as bad - or possibly worse - than RNZ. Their Te Reo usage seems to grow more extensive by the day. It's simply bad manners to talk to people in a language they don't understand, and a studied insult when the people who don't understand it are paying their wages.

 

And the use of Maori words is becoming more and more common throughout the public sector.

 

Victoria University of Wellington recently placed a large newspaper advertisement for a “Tumu Whakarae – Vice-Chancellor”. The ad had 10 paragraphs of text – five in English and five in Te Reo (Maori). Since it is inconceivable that the university would appoint as Vice Chancellor somebody who could speak Maori but could not speak English, half the ad was a total waste of money – expensive virtue signaling at the taxpayers’ expense.

 

Auckland Transport has recently spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to ensure that all announcements on the Auckland rail system are made in both Maori and English, while a little earlier Auckland Council had spent thousands of dollars to ensure that elevators in the Council Head Office announced the floor levels in both Maori and English.

We seem to remember noticing the same phenomenon in hospitals. Or are we imagining things? Surely with the parlous state of the "health" (sickness) sector, money wouldn't be thrown around proclaiming floor levels (and were ward names translated too - surely not) in Te Reo. Or is it an attempt to level the playing field, to make health outcomes more equitable, to help Maori feel more comfy in hospital, where the statistics say they spend an inordinate amount of time, which is highly regrettable? 

And this spending by a Council which claims that rates must be increased well above the inflation rate because of all its allegedly high priority projects.

 

Bay of Plenty DHB withdrew this cartoon, called by an Auckland University academic "a return to the Dark Ages"

Somebody has sent me a pamphlet received after she'd had a Covid test. One side of the page had instructions in the Maori language, just in case there are people who can read Maori but not English. On the side which was ostensibly in English, Maori words were scattered liberally, sometimes with translation into English but often not.

One column headed “Set the Tikanga” provided the following advice:

* “Decide what the tikanga is for your whare so everyone is clear.

 

* “Hold a whanau hui so everyone knows how to manaaki each other if someone gets  sick.

* “Communicate your expectations with your manuhiri e.g. text or message before they arrive, beep from the gate, wait in the waka.”

At another point, the English side of the advice continues “Prepare your pataka” and “Make sure your pataka has plenty of kai in case you need to isolate”.

Not to put too fine a point on it, this is pidgin English and if we carry on like this our great- grandchildren will be speaking not English or Te Reo, but pidgin.

And of course, without the slightest attempt to ascertain whether the public want to change our country’s name, the Government increasingly refers to our country as “Aotearoa”, or perhaps “Aotearoa New Zealand”. The report of the Climate Change Commission doesn’t use the words “New Zealand” anywhere in its several hundred pages. This is despite polls showing that the overwhelming majority of New Zealanders (some two-thirds) want our country’s name to remain “New Zealand”. And that the original Maori words for “New Zealand”, as used in the Treaty of Waitangi, were “Nu Tirani”.

And despite the millions of dollars it would cost to change our country's name. "Aotearoa" might be - it is - far more euphonious and poetic than "New Zealand" but as Don points out, there is no support for changing the name among the people who pay the bills - the taxpayers. Very evidently however, there is the political will to do it. "Let's do this! Yep yep!"    

It appears clear that the Government is hell-bent on encouraging all New Zealanders to learn the Maori language – a language which is of no practical value to the vast majority of New Zealanders – and that in a situation where far too many people going through our education system cannot read or write English – a language which is of fundamental value to all New Zealanders, vitally important for communicating with other New Zealanders and indeed of great value communicating with hundreds of millions of people around the world.

But the Maori language is of course of fundamental value to this Government, even though few of their supporters speak it. Its value to a socialist government lies in its destabilising influence on society, by the Communist staple strategy of divide and conquer, of lowering educational standards and income for the plebs. 

The last National Government, accepting advice that learning a second language may have some advantages for the development of young brains, had a plan to encourage schools to provide a second language, with schools being able to choose which of ten languages they wished to teach. Labour, apparently fearing that very few parents would want to have their children learn Maori if they instead could learn a language which would actually be useful for their future careers, vetoed that plan, and has devoted huge effort to ensure that every school provides some instruction in the Maori language.

The reality is that for the overwhelming majority of New Zealanders the Maori language has no practical value and that, despite heroic efforts to revive the language, it is spoken by a diminishing proportion of Maori.

 

The international evidence suggests that even making a dying language compulsory does not ensure its survival. After the formation of the Irish Free State in 1921, Irish was made compulsory. Not only did this fail to achieve the hoped-for revitalisation of Irish, the language is currently in near-terminal decline.

Like the Irish nation itself which (like Europe, and like New Zealand) is way below replacement rate. 

And the same is true of other languages where compulsion has been tried – Tamil among the Tamil-speaking population of Singapore, Luxembourgish in Luxembourg and so on.

Personally, I have always supported taxpayer resources being used to teach the Maori language to those who wish to learn it, but I strongly oppose foisting it on the rest of us.

We in New Zealand are extremely fortunate to have English as our predominant language, the language of science, the language of aviation, the language of finance, and the language which will get you understood in almost every country in the world.

Dr Don Brash, Former Governor of the Reserve Bank and Leader of the New Zealand National Party from 2003 to 2006 and ACT in 2011.https://breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com/2022/01/don-brash-why-is-maori-language-being.html