Friday, 31 December 2021

FAUCI, BIG PHARMA, UK GOVT ARRAIGNED FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address or Messenger. Significant comments on matters of faith and morals may also be posted on this page.


Angela and Jacinda: out of the Schwab Stable of not-so-young Global Leaders 



Poised on the brink of a new year, we are offered new hope - and called to intense prayer - as Dr Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III et al are at last arraigned in the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity.

They and twelve others - CEOs of leading vaccine corporations and those responsible for public health in the United Kingdom - are accused of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code, and war crimes.

Klaus Schwab, eminence gris of the WEF, responsible for foisting the young socialist Jacinda Ardern on an unsuspecting world, is among those charged. Let's pray his protege will meet the same fate.


In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on December 6, an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.

Peter Daszak of the WHO, said to be guilty of conflict of interest over involvement with the Wuhan Institute of VIrology 

https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/covid-19-pharmaceutical-giants-gates-fauci-uk-officials-accused-of-crimes-against-humanity-in-international-criminal-court-complaint/

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/10/uk-team-file-complaint-of-crimes-against-humanity-with-the-international-criminal-court/comment-page-1/

https://leohohmann.com/2021/12/17/whistleblower-activists-file-complaint-with-international-criminal-court-alleging-big-pharma-gates-fauci-uk-officials-committed-crimes-against-humanity/#more-8418

Besides the four kingpins, twelve others were named, including the CEOs of the leading vaccine corporations and the health leaders held accountable for the United Kingdom.

  • Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
  • Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
  • Pascal Soriot, CEO of Astra Zeneca
  • Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson and Johnson 
  • Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO
  • Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister
  • Christopher Whitty, UK Chief Medical Adviser 
  • Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
  • Sajid Javid, current UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 
  • June Raine, UK Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products 
  • Dr. Rajiv Shah, President of the Rockefeller Foundation
  • Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum

https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

Dr. Rajiv Shah, having worked for the Gates Foundation since 2001, was named a World Economic Forum “Young Global Leader” in 2007.

As was Jacinda Ardern. 

He now presides over the Rockefeller Foundation, a group funding ID2020 along with the Gates Foundation.

As Jacinda Ardern presides over the demise of democracy, the immolation of thousands of unborn infants and the capitulation of Kiwis to her poisoned apple, the Pfizer vaccine.  

https://norberthaering.de/en/power-control/id2020-immunization-passes/

https://youtu.be/r32OutVAPiw

Klaus Schwab, a wickedly intelligent, perhaps diabolical German with double doctorate degrees in Economics and Engineering, is the founder of the World Economic Forum, a club for the wealthiest percentile of the world’s corporate and political elite. He is a power broker who has groomed many presidents, prime ministers and tech CEOs who now view him with reverence and unswerving loyalty.

There you have it: NZ's Prime Minister is in the pocket of the evil Klaus Schwab and his globalist cronies, the so-called 'Pope Francis' being their religious figurehead. 

Schwab, an economist, and technocrat has befriended many nations, most significantly China’s Xi Jinping, who delivered a key speech at Davos. He praised his vision of a New World Order. On January 25, 2021, Klaus Schwab vowed his support for Xi Jinping with these words, “Mr. President (Xi Jinping) I believe this is the best time to reset our policies and to work, jointly, for a peaceful and prosperous world. We all welcome now, his excellency, Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China.” See mark 2:26.

 

Schwab and Xi Jinping

https://youtu.be/fp0HXMlStBA

Many consider Schwab the mastermind behind the current movement towards cryptocurrency, universal identification, and a one-world (fascist) government to be run jointly, in totalitarian fashion, with China.

https://conservapedia.com/Klaus_Schwab

Attorney Hannah Rose and seven applicants brought the Nuremberg action on behalf of the victims, the entire population of the United Kingdom. She filed the legal proceeding with the International Criminal Court located at The Hague. The Hague is notable for its long history in helping victims seek redress for war crimes and defining appropriate ethical guidelines for conduct during war.

Following the Nazi atrocities committed during World War II, the war crime trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany. Following these, a set of principles was developed, which ultimately led to the development of the Nuremberg Code.

These principles essentially meant that no one, no matter how wealthy or powerful, even a head of state, was above the law. The fact that the law of their home nation would permit their action would not relieve the person from justice under international law.

In particular, the medical experiments conducted by the Nazi doctors led to strict rules and ethical principles regarding future human scientific trials, including the doctrine of necessary informed consent and freedom from coercion or threat in submitting to experimental drugs.


Friedrich Hoffman holdis a stack of death records, testifiimg tp the murder of 324 Catholic priests exposed to malaria during Nazi medical experiments at Dachau. .

 

As we all know, before receiving a surgical procedure, there is a legal and ethical requirement that the patient be apprised of any significant potential risks, including infection, bleeding, nerve damage, or even death. The patient usually signs the consent form following this explanation. And as we all know, whenever we receive prescription medication, we are notified of the potential risks on a package insert and usually a discussion with the Pharmacist.

The vaccines should be no different, yet they are. A person about to receive the jab is rarely told that there are risks of blood clots, bleeding, cerebral thrombosis, myocarditis, and death, yet those risks exist. See mark 12:58 to 17:40.

https://rumble.com/vg6dcd-peter-mccullough-interview.html

https://ukfreedomproject.org/resources/open-letter-to-dr-june-raine-chief-executive-mhra/

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/beyond-ivermectin-censoring-medical-journals/article_b1089af2-4279-11ec-b491-5bcaf600d33c.html

https://www.totalhealth.co.uk/blog/are-people-getting-full-facts-covid-vaccine-risks

Attorney Hannah Rose notes in Point 40 of her brief that the ethical standards of the Nuremberg Code amount to an obligation on physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers to abide by its principles. Accordingly, any physician or research scientist found to have breached any of the ten principles of the Nuremberg Code would face criminal liability.

https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

She notes in Point 42, “The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is a willingness and informed consent by the person to receive treatment and participate in an experiment. The person is supposed to activate freedom of choice without the intervention, either through force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation, or any other type of binding or coercion.” 

And how could one describe the NZ Government's barrage of advertising for the Pfizer jab, other than as solicitation, fraud and deceit? Well there's propaganda, of course ...  

https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

In Point 43 she argues, “When the heads of the Ministry of Health as well as the Prime Minister presented the vaccine in the United Kingdom and began the vaccination of United Kingdom residents, the vaccinated  were not advised, that in practice, they would be taking part in a medical experiment and that their consent is required under the Nuremberg Code. This as a matter of fact is a genetic medical experiment on human beings performed without informed consent under a severe and blatant offense of the Nuremberg Code.”

In addition, Rose argues under Point 44 that there is an obligation for alternative treatments to be discussed, including the risks and benefits of such alternatives.  She notes that these were never discussed despite the fact alternative treatments have been proven to be safe and effective “with up to a 100% success rate.” 

https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout-secret-revealed

A key principle of the Nuremberg Code requires that a scientist must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-nuremberg-code#permissible-medical-experiments-1

In Point 46, she argues, “It is known that the mRNA ‘vaccination’ treatments have caused the death of many as well as injury and severe damage (including disablement and paralysis) after the ‘vaccine’ was administered. Despite this fact, the government did not instruct the initiation of an investigation into the matter. It is also questionable that given the experimental nature of these vaccinations, that there are not any full reports available of the numbers of dead or injured, as may be expected in such a medical process for the benefit of the public participating in the experiment.”

We may note in passing that the inventor of the mRNA technology and outspoken critic of the mRNA vaccines, Dr Robert Malone, has in the last 24 hours been arbitrarily banned from Twitter - a platform for the terminally left-wing, PC brigade since its inception.  


Dr Robert Malone, suspended from Twitter for publishing Pfizer's own data on the jab

 

https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

The reader is reminded that Nazi physicians conducted experiments on human beings in concentration camps without informed consent, leading to horrific suffering and death. 

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-medical-experiments

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/holocaust/experiside.html

To dramatically underscore the relevance of Nuremberg to the horrific deaths we now see related to theexperimental mRNA ‘vaccination’ program, Rose, in Point 34a, included a statement from a group of Holocaust survivors, those who experienced first-hand both the Nazi experiments and today the vaccine experiment. This is an excerpt from their unique perspective: 

We, the survivors of the atrocities committed against humanity during the Second World War, feel bound to follow our conscience…Another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place before our eyes. We call upon you to stop this ungodly medical experiment on humankind immediately. It is a medical experiment to which the Nuremberg Code must be applied.

https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav issued a statement in Points 34b and 34c:

The stark lesson of the Holocaust is that whenever doctors join forces with government and deviate from their personal, professional, clinical commitment to do no harm to the individual, medicine can then be perverted from a healing, humanitarian profession to a murderous apparatus…

What sets the Holocaust apart from all other mass genocides is the pivotal role played by the medical establishment, the entire medical establishment. Every step of the murderous process was endorsed by the academic, professional medical establishment.

 

Nazi physician Carl Clauberg (left), who performed medical experiments on prisoners at Auschwitz

https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

As a direct result of the Nuremberg World War II experience, the United Nations asked the International Law Commission to develop the Nuremberg Principles, the key standards  to avoid the Nazi doctors' atrocities. Unfortunately, as Hannah Rose pointed out, many of these ten principles of the Nuremberg Code were systematically violated by the United Kingdom and many other countries (including New Zealand - ed) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-nuremberg-code#permissible-medical-experiments-1

International Criminal Court, The Hague

In addition, a permanent international criminal court was established for investigation and enforcement - known as The International Criminal Court. The ICC began full-time operations in 2002 and currently has 123 member nations that have explicitly agreed to be bound by the Rome Statutes. 

The United Kingdom is a member while the United States is not.

New Zealand became a party to the Rome Statutes of the International Criminal Court in 2000.

However, under article 12(3) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, even a state that is NOT a member may exercise jurisdiction "by declaration lodged with the Registrar," meaning that any nation may be subject to the ICC depending upon the circumstances, member nation or not. Keep in mind that Nazi Germany had not consented to jurisdiction.

The ICC bills itself as a "court of last resort" meaning that claims should be decided in the perpetrator's home nation whenever possible. However, the core principle of impunity drives the ICC, the belief that no one who commits war crimes should enjoy freedom from criminal responsibility. Therefore, the ICC operates as an impartial and omnipotent arbiter of world human rights and will aggressively step in when it sees flagrant Nuremberg-type atrocities without consequence.

That is precisely what Hannah Rose has identified in her legal brief in Point 2,

"We have tried to raise this case through the English police and the English Court system without success, we have been unable even to get the case registered either with the police or with the court after several attempts...This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly."

Attorney Rose relied partly upon the expertise of Dr. Michael Yeadon, a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology and former Vice President and Chief Scientist at Pfizer.

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

In the background section of the brief, she writes in Point 5:

"The Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ do not meet the requirement to be categorized as vaccines and are in fact gene therapy (Appendix 8)...Dr. Mike Yeadon, a joint applicant on this request, asserts that claims calling the Covid-19 injections a 'vaccine' is public manipulation and misrepresentation of clinical treatment.

"It's not a vaccination. It's not prohibiting infection. It's not a prohibiting transmission device. It's a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then allegedly your body somehow gets used to dealing with it, but unlike a vaccine, which is to trigger the immune response, this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.' 

"MRNA uses the cell's machinery to synthesize proteins that are supposed to resemble the SPIKE protein of the virus, which is what it uses to enter cells via the ACE2 receptor. These proteins are then identified by the immune system, which builds antibodies against them. The real concern is that these proteins could accumulate in the body, especially in regions of high concentration of ACE2 receptors, such as the gonads. If the immune system then attacks the location where they accumulate, then you could be dealing with an auto-immune condition."

https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

Dr. Yeadon mentions, in an interview, that our governments have grossly exaggerated the entire threat of COVID-19. He notes that COVID-19 represents a slightly greater risk than influenza if you are older than age 70 but a much lower risk than the seasonal flu if you are younger. See mark 31:00.

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

"So it’s just absurd that you should be happy or willing to let your economy and civil society be smashed for something which represents for almost everyone working a lower risk than influenza - but that’s true," Yeadon said in the interview.

"Given this virus represents at worst a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than does influenza, and a less risk than for almost everyone else who’s younger and fit, it was NEVER NECESSARY for us to have done anything.

Are you receiving, Catholic Bishops of New Zealand?  

"We didn't need to do anything, lockdowns, masks, mass testing, vaccines

- closing churches, cancelling the Eucharist,  refusing Catholics access to the Blessed Sacrament -   

there are multiple therapeutic drugs that are at least as effective as vaccines are...an off-patent drug called Ivermectin, one of the most widely used drugs in the world, is also able to reduce symptoms at any stage of the disease including lethality by about 90%. 

https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-Freedom-Justus-R-Hope-ebook/dp/B09M95F8NF

https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-World-Justus-R-Hope/dp/1737415909

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/SUMMARY-OF-THE-EVIDENCE-BASE.pdf

"So you don't need vaccines and you don't need any of the measures that have been introduced at all," Yeadon concluded. See mark 31:15. 

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

For any reader still under the illusion that these mRNA covid vaccines have helped, please read the following article comparing the countries without vaccination to those with it. The most vaccinated nations have deaths per million up to 100 x greater than the least. Always question what the government tells you.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/vaccines-work---for-smallpox-and-measles/article_978543f2-56c2-11ec-af20-5ff179ad7b93.html

Yeadon goes on to explain that people need not worry about variants. He explains that our immune system is easily able to deal with ALL mutations of SARS-CoV-2 and explains that 18 years after the first SARS, those people are still protected by their immunity - and this immunity even extends to immunity against SARS-CoV-2, a virus 80% similar but 20% different than the original SARS.

Yeadon's major point is that if survivors of SARS some 18 years later have immunity against the new virus, which is 20% different, why would we believe that a current viral mutant only 0.3% different would be a threat? See mark 35:40.

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

"So when your government scientists say that a variant that’s 0.3% different from SARS could masquerade as a new virus and be a threat to your health, you should know, and I'm telling you, THEY ARE LYING. If they're lying and they are, why is the pharmaceutical industry making top-up vaccines? They are making them," Yeadon said. See mark 35:55 

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

"You should be terrified at this point. I am, because there is absolutely no possible justification for their manufacture. But they're being made, and the world's medicine regulators have said...we won't be asking them to do any clinical safety studies. Let me just say again, the variants are not different enough to represent a threat to you so you do not need top-up vaccines..., Yeadon said.

"The regulators have waved them through. I'm very frightened of that - there's no possible benign interpretation of this. I believe they are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. Seriously. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation.

This will provide the tools to do it and plausible deniability - because they will create another story about some sort of biological threat, you'll line up and get your top-up vaccines, and a few months or a year or so later, you'll die of some peculiar, inexplicable syndrome, and they won't be able to associate it with the top-up vaccines." See mark 36:05 to 37:15.

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

Yeadon follows this up with his conclusion, "This system (mandatory vaccine passports) is being put in place using lies, and it's being put in place for some purpose, and I believe that purpose is complete totalitarian control, and I think the purpose of that is going to be mass depopulation." See mark 45:40.

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

"Do not allow it to be an interoperable global fixed-format database because that will be the end of human freedom, and I see no way of recovering from that once the system's up and running." See mark 46:30

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

Yeadon explained that few people will hear his words and that this fraud was perpetrated on the world's population through censorship, fear and propaganda. Dr. Yeadon, an insightful man, notes that the perpetrators have exhaustively planned this all, and they have considered how people might respond. Yeadon notes that if we all respond as expected, we will lose.

"Collectively, we need to do something unexpected." See mark 48:43.

What would be very unexpected, in this post-Christian world, would be a global campaign of intense prayer. 

https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html

However, it is likely they didn't plan on the International Criminal Court coming after them. They also didn't plan on Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, an experienced trial lawyer licensed in Germany and California who founded the Berlin Corona Committee, which heads a group of attorneys with global reach dedicated to dragging this deadly conspiracy into the open and suing it into oblivion.

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e

Fuellmich does an excellent job in this interview of exposing the actions of Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, WEF, also known as Davos. The WEF has as its goal the establishment of a New World Order, with the globe to be run by self-selected technocrats like Bill Gates, himself, and other members of Davos.

With Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the 'Pope' as its religious figurehead to give the NWO some 'spiritual' authenticity.  

In 1971 Schwab founded what was to become the WEF in 1987. It has 1,000 members. In general, qualification requires a business to have more than 5 billion dollars per year in revenue. The theme of WEF and Klaus Schwab has recently been "The Great Reset," which essentially means a new world order. In the following video, Klaus Schwab can be heard discussing this with Henry Kissinger. We hear Dr. Kissinger praising China’s Xi Jinping's speech and the formation of a new international order. See mark 2:50 to 4:00.

https://youtu.be/Apjzjsa8AIg

Schwab himself sums up the 2017 Davos Meeting with the following statement, "What  a wonderful opportunity to conclude our week here with such concrete proposals and ideas of how we can really create a New World Order." See mark 26:40.

https://youtu.be/Apjzjsa8AIg

Professor Andreas Oehler aptly describes the agenda of Schwab and the WEF, "The World Economic Forum seems to be the driver behind and organizer of the global population control operations, be it pandemics, biometric IDs, Great Reset, or public-private partnerships in the name of the "common good" (fascist corporatism)."

Jorge Mario Bergoglio and his once-were-Catholic bishops in New Zealand are devotees of this thing they call 'the common good', hijacked we believe from the NO catechism. 

See the following article,  "The Four Horseman of the Apocalypse identified, along with the Apocalypse itself."

https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/

Professor Oehler of the University of Bamberg is widely published in credit, banking, finance, and investor protection. He believes that Klaus Schwab and his WEF members, including Bill Gates, planned the COVID-19 pandemic by sponsoring Event 201, a coronavirus pandemic simulation exercise held in New York City on October 18, 2019. WEF has been a proponent of digital biometric identity systems to make societies "more efficient and productive" (and easier to control).

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/

Oehler wrote, "WEF collaborates with the ID2020 alliance, funded by the Gates and Rockefeller foundations to run a program to 'provide digital ID with vaccines.' In particular, ID2020 sees the vaccination of children as 'an entry point for digital identity.' In reality, this means that anything a person does or is allowed to do (employment, travel, commerce, health care...) will be linked to the person's digital ID. This will remove any privacy and take total control over each and every activity of any individual on earth."

https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/

For readers who may doubt this, read Klaus Schwab's book, The Great Reset. One of his chief goals is to have perfect monitoring ability of every human being and to be able to regulate all behavior, even to the point of complete totalitarian control.

https://www.amazon.com/COVID-19-Great-Reset-Klaus-Schwab/dp/2940631123

The WEF sees times of great turmoil or catastrophes as ideal opportunities to implement this reset, such as during the financial crisis of 2008, and now the COVID-19 pandemic, which Dr. Reiner Fuellmich feels created a perfect opportunity for the WEF to execute its plan. Fuellmich, a world-renowned trial attorney, refers to Schwab and his henchmen collectively as “Mr. Global.”

"Klaus Schwab spells this out in his book, The Great Reset, and demands… a World Government under the UN, which has been brought under control by the WEF. This is to be achieved by creating as much worldwide chaos as possible in the form of pandemics, wars including civil wars and natural disasters so that the world population becomes convinced that the national governments are overwhelmed, and only a world government can help. 

At the same time, Schwab calls for the shifting of all wealth to Mr. Global so that in 2030, no one, except Mr. Global, will still own anything, and we will supposedly be happy with that. Cash is to be abolished and replaced by a digital currency.  This will be allocated to or taken away from every person in the world who can then also be found anywhere and at any time by various tracking systems. This is to be done by a single central world bank." See mark 32:45 to 33:56.

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e

Fuellmich and Oehler both describe a series of puppets that the WEF has trained to help carry out these missions under the WEF "Young Global Leader" program, which started in 1993. Such people have gone on to become Presidents, Prime Ministers, and CEOs. These include some of the key players in this pandemic and vaccination effort: 

  • Microsoft founder Bill Gates (1993)
  • California Governor Gavin Newsom (selected in 2005)
  • Pete Buttigieg (selected in 2019, candidate for US President in 2020, US secretary of transportation since 2021)
  • Stéphane Bancel (Moderna CEO; selected in 2009)
  • Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg (2009)
  • Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg (2007)
  • Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page (2002/2005)
  • Covid Twitter personality Eric Feigl-Ding (a ‘WEF Global Shaper‘ since 2013)
  • New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (since 2017, selected in 2014)
  • Australian Health Minister Greg Hunt (selected in 2003; former WEF strategy director)
  • Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland (selected in 2001; former managing director of Reuters)
  • Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is a WEF participant but is not a confirmed Young Global Leader 
  • German Chancellor Angela Merkel (selected in 1993, 12 years before becoming Chancellor)
  • Current German Health Minister Jens Spahn and former Health Ministers Philipp Roesler and Daniel Bahr
  • EU Commission Presidents Jose Manuel Barroso (2004-2014, selected in 1993) and Jean-Claude Juncker (2014-2019, selected in 1995)
  • French President Emanuel Macron (since 2017, selected in 2016), 
  • Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy (2007-2012, selected in 1993), 
  • Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz
  • Former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi (2014-2016, selected in 2012), 
  • Former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar (1996-2004, selected in 1993)
  • Dr. Rajiv Shah, President of the Rockefeller Foundation

Fuellmich and Oehler both describe a series of puppets that the WEF has trained to help carry out these missions under the WEF "Young Global Leader" program, which started in 1993. Such people have gone on to become Presidents, Prime Ministers, and CEOs. These include some of the key players in this pandemic and vaccination effort: 

  • Microsoft founder Bill Gates (1993)
  • California Governor Gavin Newsom (selected in 2005)
  • Pete Buttigieg (selected in 2019, candidate for US President in 2020, US secretary of transportation since 2021)
  • Stéphane Bancel (Moderna CEO; selected in 2009)
  • Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg (2009)
  • Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg (2007)
  • Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page (2002/2005)
  • Covid Twitter personality Eric Feigl-Ding (a ‘WEF Global Shaper‘ since 2013)
  • New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (since 2017, selected in 2014)
  • Australian Health Minister Greg Hunt (selected in 2003; former WEF strategy director)
  • Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland (selected in 2001; former managing director of Reuters)
  • Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is a WEF participant but is not a confirmed Young Global Leader 
  • German Chancellor Angela Merkel (selected in 1993, 12 years before becoming Chancellor)
  • Current German Health Minister Jens Spahn and former Health Ministers Philipp Roesler and Daniel Bahr
  • EU Commission Presidents Jose Manuel Barroso (2004-2014, selected in 1993) and Jean-Claude Juncker (2014-2019, selected in 1995)
  • French President Emanuel Macron (since 2017, selected in 2016), 
  • Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy (2007-2012, selected in 1993), 
  • Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz
  • Former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi (2014-2016, selected in 2012), 
  • Former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar (1996-2004, selected in 1993)
  • Dr. Rajiv Shah, President of the Rockefeller Foundation

 


                   https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/



               When we notice the harsh authoritarian and mandatory lockdowns of Australia,                         Austria, and Canada (and New Zealand - ed), perhaps it begins to make better                         sense when we factor in the                   names of those in the WEF Young Global                     Leadership program. See mark 34:25 to                   34:58.

  • https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e

    Now, against our seemingly hopeless situation, Reiner Fuellmich gives us all every reason to be optimistic:

    "Against this background, which increasingly more people are recognizing, very large legal disputes have been set in motion in India, South Africa, the US, Canada, and France. Their goal is to hold those responsible accountable under both civil and criminal law. This also includes that the assets that have been taken away by Mr. Global from the world's population...are returned...In particular, Anglo-American Law with its powerful tools of class action, pre-trial discovery, punitive damages...provides the tools for very effective justice." See mark 35:00.

    https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e

    Reiner mentions that he has developed very good evidence that the PCR test was fraudulently used to grossly exaggerate the number of true COVID cases and the courts in Portugal, Austria and Germany, have set excellent precedents in their rulings to that effect.

    Fuellmich concludes, "The Berlin Corona Committee already now has extremely incriminating  evidence proving that this Corona ‘plandemic’ NEVER had anything to do with health; rather Mr. Global’s actions are aimed solely at these goals:

    #1. Destruction of regional economies to make the population dependent on Mr. Global's global supply chains.

    #2. Shifting the wealth of the world's populations from the bottom to the top - to the super-rich - to Mr. Global.

    #3. Population reduction - you can call it genocide.

    #4. The installation of a World Government under the UN which is now under the control of the WEF." See mark 36:13 to 36:56.

    https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e

    He reminds us that we are dealing with megalomaniacs and sociopaths (e.g. Ardern and Daniel Andrews - ed), those who lack a conscience. Fuellmich reminds us that while the mainstream media may censor, hundreds of thousands of people hear the message anyway; they are taking to the streets in protest in England, Germany, Australia, Brazil, etc. Civil servants, medical doctors, lawyers, politicians, nurses, and police officers are refusing the jab. 

    Key elements include those of compassion and spirituality, as this has indeed become an epic struggle between right versus wrong. Reiner tells the story of a doctor who walked into a bank and was accosted by a person afraid because he was not wearing a mask. He hugged the individual who began to weep because they had not been held in more than a year. Fuellmich reminds us that we can all laugh, cry, and feel while they (the sociopaths) cannot.

    Attorney Rose, now a heroic icon, asked the ICC to take immediate action by way of legal injunction in Points 128 and 153: 

    It is of the utmost urgency, that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of covid vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction.

    https://docdro.id/WUjv6iw

    In closing, Reiner Fuellmich asked us to remember spirituality. We must celebrate our humanity. Like those in the Nazi concentration camps, who remembered to sing and praise God in the face of the most extreme adversity, we too must cling to our roots in religion and love for one another. Fuellmich is confident that we will prevail. See mark 38:40.

  • https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Reiner-Fuellmich-Introduction-English_BestCut:e

    That’s what this is all about, humanity versus inhumanity. We are human. We can laugh, cry, sing, dance and hug. The other side, Mr. Global and his puppets can’t do that. They can only fake feelings and have no empathy at all. This is because the other side has no access to the spiritual side. The US Constitution starts with the words, ‘We the People.’ And when the wall came down between East and West Berlin, 33 years ago, it was the East German people chanting – We the people – that brought it down. Mr. Global’s house of cards will come crashing down the very same way. Without a doubt in my mind, Mr. Global and his puppets will lose this war of good against evil – they will lose their insane war against life and creation itselfThere is no other way.

    After hearing him speak, I am confident as well. Dr. Pierre Kory once told me, "This situation seems backward. The doctors were the corrupt people who caused this mess, but the lawyers are those with ethics who will save us."

    Pierre Kory, as usual, is correct. Some day, today's youth will become senior citizens. They will remind their society of today’s Nuremberg II trials, and how they helped stop the largest con job ever perpetrated on the world. It is time to end the lockdowns, the vaccination mandates, the censorship, and the propaganda.

  • The media will resume reporting real news and cease fear-mongering. Then, journalists will return to what they do best – proper investigative reporting. And the International Criminal Court will most assuredly continue what it does best – bringing cold-blooded mass murderers to justice.

    https://famous-trials.com/nuremberg/1903-doctortrial

    Here is a change.org petition on the article. 

    Dr. Justus R. Hope, writer’s pseudonym, graduated summa cum laude from Wabash College where he was named a Lilly Scholar. He attended Baylor College of Medicine where he was awarded the M.D. degree. He completed a residency in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation at The University of California Irvine Medical Center. He is board-certified and has taught at The University of California Davis Medical Center in the departments of Family Practice and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. He has practiced medicine for over 35 years and maintains a private practice in Northern California.

 It's not just New Year's Eve. It's also the Vigil of the Solemnity of Mary, the Mother of God. She is our Mother too, and Mother of the Church. We must pray to her as Co-Redemptrix, Spouse of the Holy Spirit and Daughter of the Father. 

The Mother of God of Tenderness Towards Evil Hearts

    Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin 

Thursday, 30 December 2021

EX-ASHHURST LATIN MASSGOERS SENT TO OLOL: THE NEW FAITH EXPLAINED

To comment please open your gmail account or use my email address or Messenger. Significant comments on matters of faith and morals may also be posted on this page.


Traditional Latin Mass altar in close-up


Just who is responsible for what looks like a calculated insult to the cancelled Latin Mass community of St Columba's Ashhurst, choosing Our Lady of Lourdes Palmerston North for the only Novus Ordo Missae they can now attend?

Traditional Latin Massgoers, at least in this neck of the woods, are overwhelmingly vaccine-free simply because the Mass of Ages teaches the doctrine of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church on the sanctity of life, an unchangeable dogma which has been tossed aside by the Novus Ordo mob in collaboration with the evil diktats of socialist, globalist regimes worldwide. 

So that now by their faithful adherence to Church teaching they are excluded not just from polite society but also by diktat of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, ably assisted by the Cupich of the Pacific Cardinal John Dew, from their Latin Mass parish of St Columba's.

They are expected to attend OLOL, run by Father Joe Grayland, a modernist of the first water who celebrates the NO circus-style, 'in the round' - on a table encircled by chairs rather than pews, with no kneelers, the crucifix afar off on the end wall and our Lord shunted sideways, right by a busy exterior door.


OLOL PN: all the charm of a school hall


For traditional Latin Mass Catholics used to kneeling in adoration facing an altar complete with tabernacle and crucifix (not to mention fresh flowers, candles and liturgical books), the choice of OLOL for Sunday Mass seems a slap in the face.


    Father Christopher Basden, the parish priest in Ramsgate, England, celebrating Mass in the shrine of St. Augustine (link

 

       A Question Has To Be Posed: What Are The Fruits of the Revolutionary Transformation of the Liturgy?

    By Fr Christopher Basden, Parish Priest of Ramsgate, England

    (First published on December 24, 2021, in Rorate Caeli, here)

    Since the Pope’s recent brutal and unmerciful constriction of the traditional Latin Mass, many have been shocked by its unusual severity and questioned what motivates it. Liberal Catholic friends respond that it lacks the inclusivity that a broad Church demands. Friends from beyond the confines of Catholicism scratch their heads; this is the classic Roman ritual which for 1 ½ millennia was the inspiration of countless works of music, literature and art.

    One of the loveliest personal memories I have was the infectiously charming and bubbly founder of the famous monastery of Le Barroux, Abbot Gerard Calvet OSB. Out of the chaos of the disintegration of religious life in the 1960s he had left his community and become a hermit. Sought out by young disciples he was urged to re-initiate traditional monastic life centred on the classical liturgy. This he accomplished with his foundation nestled beneath the majesty of Mt Ventoux (of Tour de France fame) in Provence.

    In 1988, feeling the Episcopal consecrations were a step too far, he sought canonical recognition from the Vatican. Despite the warm welcome of Pope John Paul this was not shared by the monastic establishment who excluded him from their associations.

    I found this shocking and sad and after a while I was relieved to hear he had at last been invited to the worldwide conference of Abbots in Rome. I hoped, I remarked to him, that they were welcoming. His response: “Oui ils etaient gentils mais c’est une autre religion.” ("Yes they were kind but it’s another religion.") I was quite startled and struck by what I then perceived to be an extreme assessment, but a quarter of a century later it bears further scrutiny.

    But let us get back to the question at hand. Why on earth does such a venerable ancient Rite with stellar accomplishments in the pantheon of saints, not to mention the huge cultural impact it has had within western civilisation, merit exclusion?

    Today its adherents represent a tiny percentage, largely unknown in the worldwide Catholic Church since the Rite’s termination in 1969.

    Despite the liberalisation of its use in 2007, and a remarkable flourishing of vocations and conversions in the limited confines in which it returned to use, why the draconian and fearful suffocation of newly ordained priests being permitted to use it? Why should the new young communities be subjected to hostile commissars bent on eradicating the old Rite as if it were a dangerous virus?

    The papal condemnation accuses these traditionalists of being divisive and of being ideologically opposed to the second Vatican Council. However that Council (of which most of the young devotees know little, having been born long after its closure in 1965!) was pastoral, not definitively doctrinal let alone ideological.

    The vast majority of the bishops at the Council, including Marcel Lefebvre, signed most of its decrees.

    It was largely what came afterwards, with the explosive and revolutionary ‘implementation’ of the Council.

    The vast majority of bishops had no say (let alone anyone else) in the promulgation of the reformed Mass.

    However, at the Synod of Bishops in 1967 it is on record that only a minority of bishops present approved the New Order of Mass.     

    Cardinal Heenan prophesied it would result in dwindling numbers. In spite of this, the Consilium pushed it through, calling on all to be a obedient to the “spirit of Vatican II.”

    Cardinal Ottaviani, then head of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, complained that the new Mass marked a “striking departure” from the solemnly defined Catholic Eucharistic theology of the Council of Trent. In many ways it can be demonstrated that the Consilium’s new Mass was in no way what was envisaged by the Fathers at Vatican II. For example, the Council asks that “Latin is to be retained in all the rites” (it totally disappeared) and “Gregorian chant is to have pride of place” (It sadly has had no place at all!)

    The Rubrics which uphold facing East during the Canon are still in print but almost universally ignored.

    Cardinal Suenens boasted that Vatican II was “1789 in the Church!” Fr Yves Congar said of the Council, “the Church has peacefully undergone its October Revolution.”

    Was that really in the minds of the bishops to assembled in 1962?

    Pope Benedict deplored the “Council of the Media” and promoted the notion of the “hermeneutic of continuity”. He resisted the idea that at Vatican II we had begun completely anew.

    The holy Bishop of Leeds, Gordon Wheeler, stressed that Vatican II can only be properly interpreted within the harmony of the preceding tradition.

    The studies of Father Anthony Cekada are very disturbing. The Council called for a return to the sources, but he amply demonstrated that 83% of the Collects of the traditional Mass were discarded.

    Archbishop Bugnini (architect of the New Rite) admits in his apologia (his full papers have yet to be divulged) that ‘negative theology’ was incompatible with the sensibilities of modern man. The concepts that were deleted included the very notion of the soul! The use of this word disappears in the New Mass!

    Other deletions include miracles, fasting, mortification, error, evils, enemies, the wrath of God and Hell.

    He is on record as saying that the New Rite should avoid anything that could be a stumbling block for Protestants.

    Jean Guitton, a personal friend of Pope Paul VI, confirms this, admitting that the revolutionary changes were set in place to more perfectly coincide with the Calvinist Eucharist.

    How naive to think unity with Protestantism could be achieved, especially as now the mainstream churches of the Reformation are in terminal decline. Only the Baptist, bible based and so-called fundamentalist denominations have much life left. As former Anglican Bishop Graham Leonard declared, “the future of the Church will belong to those of conviction.”

    Even more seriously is the New Rites’ deselection of holy scripture (ignoring the warning at the close of the book of Revelation!) For example, “Whoever receives the body of the Lord unworthily merits condemnation.” This line among several others is deleted.

    Today’s young clerics who stumble on the classical Roman liturgy discover a rich scriptural content with explicit priestly and sacrificial overtones. Fr. Hugh Simon-Thwaites, SJ remarked that, “the Old Rite is the greatest expression of the Eucharistic doctrine of the Catholic Church.”

    I find it amusing but sad, that after an appeal to the Pope against the termination of the Old Mass in the ‘London Times,’ in July 1971, from the greatest men and women of culture in Britain, he recognised but one, Agatha Christie, the writer of pop murder mysteries! Others included Vladimir Ashkenazy, Kenneth Clark, Robert Graves, Yehudi Menuhin, Iris Murdoch, Nancy Mitford, and R.C. Zaehner. Most were non-Catholics and even non-Christians, including two Anglican bishops. The Old Mass was universally terminated (save in England which allowed rare permissions due to Agatha Christie!)

    After two permissive indults under Pope John Paul in 1984 and 1988 (the second responding to the Episcopal consecrations of Archbishop Lefebvre), Pope Benedict attempted to give the classic Roman Rite a home back in the Catholic Church in 2007. In his Summorum Pontificum he confirmed the long held view of many canonists, including Count Nero Capponi and Cardinal Stickler, that the Old Rite had never been canonically abrogated.

    As Joseph Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI) said, “anyone who nowadays advocates the continuing existence of this (Old) Liturgy or takes part in it is treated as a leper; all tolerance ends here. There has never been anything like this in history; in doing so we are despising and proscribing the Church’s whole past. How can we trust her at present if things are that way? Pope Pius V had in 1570 declared that the traditional Roman Rite 'would be valid henceforth now and forever.'”

    I have two contrasting memories of the response that summer of 2007. The liberal London Tablet (financially supported by the Catholic hierarchy but read more by Anglicans) screamed in protest “but it (the Old Mass) WAS banned!” At Wonersh Seminary, on the other hand, at an Eastern Churches seminar, several Orthodox ecclesiastics enthused delightedly that Rome had no longer officially proscribed its ancient tradition which had further distanced us from the Churches of the East.

    A question has to be sincerely posed: “What are the fruits of the revolutionary transformation in the liturgy which heralded a huge plethora of changes in the Church?”

    Despite the continual denial of the aged ecclesiastics in power who suffer from the “Emperor’s new clothes syndrome”...

Notable among them being Palmerston North's Bishop Emeritus Peter Cullinane, who told the St Columba's TLM community that the bad fruits of the NO can be put down to societal change ...

one can truly say that the result is a huge devastation of the vineyard of the Lord. Every religious order, diocese and parish has drastically declined since 1965 in numbers.

    We have never seen such a abandonment of priestly and Religious vows in all our history.

    By 1978 40,000 priests had left the priesthood; the sad, sweeping departures have never stopped since that time. If we had kept the priests we had actually ordained there would not be the severe shortage of clergy.

    In 1985, with the celebration of 20 years since the Council, the then Cardinal Ratzinger dared to say that the results could never be described as positive. He was demonised, and his ‘Report’ was banned from several Seminary libraries!

    Eight years earlier, in 1977, an Archbishop in Italy, Arrigo Pintonelli wrote in an open letter to his fellow Bishops that the anarchy in the church was “a true scourge of God much more vast and destructive than the one by Atila, with consequences that ought to deprive of sleep those who are responsible for the life and governance of the church, who inexplicably remain silent.”

    This terrible decline has never subsided.

    Religious women have disappeared from our streets. Monasteries collapse and Seminaries close due to the utter collapse of vocations. In England over 95% of students from our Catholic schools (our pride and joy) do not persevere in the practice of the faith. Not only in the European heartlands does the decline in vocations and practising Catholics occur. For example even the powerful Nigerian Catholic Church is subject to a continual substantial haemorrhage to Pentecostal sects.

    The sex abuse scandals have disgraced the Church and destroyed much of everything the priesthood stands for. Since 90% of the victims were teenage males we can see that pederasty and not paedophilia is the real problem. No one dares to ever speak about it, however, lest they be considered ‘homophobic.’ This has infected the highest echelons of the hierarchy as evidenced in the sordid affair of Cardinal McCarrick. What a veritable dark night of the Church!

    In contrast, the tiny percentage of clerical Institutes, convents and monasteries, using the irresistibly attractive Traditional Latin Rite, have flourished. The revival, with seminarians and Novices and conversions, has been heart-warming for so many of us worn out and wearied priests. The large noncontraceptive families represent one of the only answers to the demographic timebomb affecting the western world. Sadly the very sight of these seminarians and novices in cassocks and full habits incur the contempt, derision and detestation of the Vatican commissars.

    It is not the adherents of the Old Mass who are ideological, it is the curial officials of the Vatican who display a paranoia in the face of reasonable dissent from the so-called liturgical reforms of Bugnini. They are the ones who respond with a unpastoral ferocity and ideological fanaticism. Now, years later after decades of reluctance, I realise the old Abbot was correct.

    They are the purveyors of a new, distinct and often subtle religion without any real substantial base in scripture and tradition. While holding to the divine corpus of truth as set out in the Creed and Catechism, their slippery interpretations renders many doctrinal and moral beliefs in a subjective and relativistic manner, leaving them devoid of the original content.

    As Fr George Tyrrell SJ predicted a century ago, “Rome cannot be destroyed in a day, but if it is necessary to make it fall into dust gradually and inoffensively, then we will have a new Religion and a new Decalogue.”

    Today Tyrrell is largely rehabilitated by his brother Jesuits. The new religion will dialogue with anyone except those who stand by Catholic Tradition.

    The mantra “the liturgical reform is irreversible” and the “New Order of Mass is the richest form of the Mass in history” is not dissimilar to the empty, ugly, untrue dogmas of the Chinese communist party which has the Vatican in its financial control.

    What are the hallmarks of this new ideological religion? They are all around us in this present moment of history. The new ideology promotes the idea that “God wills diversity of religion.”

    Excepting for His “permissive will” this goes against everything objectively stated in both the Gospel and the Koran of Islam.

    The new faith deplores proselytism, thus thrusting a dagger into the church’s missionary nature, destroying the real nature of evangelisation.

    Furthermore the new faith, by moral ambiguity, devalues marriage and family life by allowing access to the sacraments after divorce and remarriage. By confusing “loving the sinner and hating the sin”, it opens the door to betraying the long held Gospel belief in the indissolubility of marriage.

    Furthermore it welcomes recognition of homosexual unions, even denying that chastity is possible! This new approach has transformed the Pontifical Academy of Life into the Pontifical Academy of ‘Choice’, thus negating the remarkable contribution of Pope John Paul in his Encyclical Evangelium Vitae.

    The new religion is man-centred, humanist, with no seeming necessity for the Atonement of Christ whose Divinity is devalued.

    Finally the title used by many previous popes and even discussed by the second Vatican Council, of Our Lady ‘Mediatrix of graces’, is to be discarded. She is but a mother.

    Here we have the neo-Protestant, de-supernaturalised religion evident for all to see.

    The present situation reminds me of the scene in CS Lewis in his Last Battle, in which a baboon covers himself in the skin of a lion proclaiming himself to be Aslan, showing forth the age of the antichrist.

    The commissars see the extraordinary growth, potential and fruits of the Old Mass in just 14 years as a threat to their pseudo faith which patently does not work.

    Do not despair. In England the faith in the 16th century was abruptly cancelled, being replaced by a new Religion and Catholics persevered underground waiting for a second spring that happened ages later. In Egypt despite the rest of the whole of North Africa ceasing to be Christian, the Copts amazingly survive, despite continual persecution.



 

    Our Blessed Lady is the ‘Conqueror of all Heresies!’ She and Saint Joseph, the ‘Patron of Times of Crisis’, will see us through this diabolical incursion into the enfeebled Church of God today. He alone wins the Victory!