Wednesday 31 July 2019

FAITHFUL KIWI PRIESTS FORCED TO FLEE

To comment, please open your gmail account, email me or use Facebook, Messenger or Twitter.
Scroll down for comments.


Ten Australian days and ten Australian churches have proved to me the utter awfulness of New Zealand's liturgical landscape.

In Melbourne in his fine church of St Philip's, Blackburn North, I met a Kiwi refugee, Fr Nicholas Dillon, who told me our late lamented Fr Brian Buenger is merely the tip of a clerical iceberg of orthodox seminarians and priests frozen out of their homeland by what we agreed is in essence a lack of Eucharistic faith. 

Fr Dillon is young, intelligent, a celebrated organist - and orthodox, like at least ten others he could name who have fled overseas to the FSSP (Priestly Fraternity of St Peter), Opus Dei and the Legion of Christ.

He knew I 'organdize' (my term for my bumbling efforts on the organ at my church - remember Winnie the Pooh?) and because I'd spent half an hour praying, instead of rubber-necking, in St Philip's before knocking on his presbytery door, he offered to show me the organ. And I could tell, simply by the way he slipped onto the seat, that he was an accomplished organist; and 'im indoors, 'umbly waiting in the car while we talked, was informed by his smartphone that Fr Dillon is actually celebrated internationally. 

I could have wept. Not only because Fr Dillon demonstrated a giftedness which is lost, perhaps forever, to the Church in New Zealand, but because I realized how I've squandered my own meagre talent, preferring to crawl on my hands and knees past Sister's door out of the music cells at Sacred Heart Wanganui, rather than practise the piano. 

We can only imagine the gifts that other Kiwi men called to the priesthood have taken with them overseas. Partly they've fled because of our seminaries' reputation for persecuting men who pray the Rosary, and for having books which had been banned and were spotted in the '80s on the library shelves by Sir Raymond de Souza, Knight of the Order of Malta. And partly it's our Kiwi egalitarianism, which bows down to the idol of community instead of Communion. 

Fr Dillon ( I do not call him Nicholas, not even Father Nicholas, or - heaven forfend - Nick) wears a cassock and a collar. He says young NZ men are put off the priesthood by "effeminate liturgies, the dreadful music, the folksy style, and the 'look at me' attitude of so many priests celebrating Mass". 

As an illustration, a Rad Trad friend tells me how after the notices at Mass in Taupo the Monsignor told a joke:

Two friends, one a Catholic the other a Jew, bought new cars and asked their holy men to bless them. The priest said a prayer and sprinkled holy water; the rabbi produced a hacksaw and cut off a short section of the exhaust pipe. 

The congregation, according to the Rad Trad, "went nuts". He didn't get it, but a lady in the pew behind explained. I didn't get it either, but a Proddy friend - not a churchgoer but educated at a Catholic school in Zimbabwe - did, and was not amused. She said it was "inappropriate. A priest told that joke in church?" 

I didn't think it was a particularly funny joke either, and I explained to the good Proddy that jokes, good bad or indifferent, have no place in the liturgy, especially not after the notices when, unless they were extraordinarily long, Jesus was still a guest in the souls of the congregation - and their Monsignor, who I myself have heard cracking jokes at Mass. 

The Mass is the unbloody re-enactment of Christ's unimaginable suffering, on our account, on Calvary. It's not funny. If Father wants to entertain, let him go to the pub and do karaoke.

To get back to priests and the lack of, you know how grateful lay people are, or should be, for the priests imported mostly from Asia by bishops who haven't managed to elicit indigenous (you can tell I've been in Orstrylia) vocations. But what our bishops are grateful for is their cultural, inbuilt deference to authority, which I guess must pretty well cancel out their equally inbuilt devotional piety. 


It suggests that importing deferential Asian priests is easier than inculcating vocations at home, in men who might buck the liberal 'progressive' line and take to Gregorian chant and wear the collar and cassock, and "say the black and do the red", and consequently are denied study opportunities overseas, or get buried in little country parishes - and even there, subjected by parishioners to the "we don't like the way you say Mass" line, like Fr Bryan Buenger, in at least one part of his rural parish.

The same priest has been Vocations Director for Dunedin Diocese, for example, for 20 years. It suggests he might be an example of the peter principle (by which people get promoted to their level of incompetence). 


Of course, orthodoxy, to be real, has to be inner faithfulness to Christ and the Magisterium of His Church, as well as outer adherence to rubrics and to traditional dress. But I have to wonder what our liberal Cardinal and Bishops - Palmerston North's, for instance, favours very open-neck shirts - are thinking about when they read the Scripture in the Divine Office for Pastors, which all priests are obliged to pray:

"Your light must shine in the sight of men, so that, seeing your good works, they may give the praise to your Father in heaven." 

Bob Gill says:

On retiring from working at one of New Zealand’s largest companies some four years ago and constantly wondering while there how such a large organisation could be so disorganized, promoting so many incompetent managers, I thought on retirement that I would never again encounter the Peter Principle you make reference to. I was so wrong.

It’s been such a different story since retiring to my wife’s home town of Dannevirke in the Palmerston North diocese, just over three years ago. I have been very disappointed at the liberal practices that are allowed in this diocese - for example, priests' blessings involving much touching for those coming forward in the Communion queue; lay persons giving blessings at the same time as the celebrant in adjoining Communion queues.

Hopefully, St Joseph's Dannevirke will shine forth at least in this from now on, as during Father Bryan’s recent visit he introduced a new method of blessing without touching which he learned from his orthodox Bishop, Thomas Olmsted. Philippa O'Neill says: So very, very true: I could name a few more that are treated like shite! ...
Bob Gill
Bob


Seen by Bob Gill at 1:26 PM
Julia


Anonymous (not him again!) says:


Its no use complaining about losing good priests.  If we don't fight for them effectively, we will continue to lose them. 

The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men (and Women) Do Nothing.

I say:

That line of Edmund Burke's was my mother's catch-cry. The trouble is, most Catholic laity don't recognize evil when it stares them in the face.
T

Moya says:

Loved your article on fleeing priests. I can add to that. The Catholic Church is lucky to have the few traditional priests we have, and not just those who celebrate the Latin Mass. A very good priest friend of mine in Dunedin has found it a closed shop, when you spoke about priests being sent to country parishes you could have been describing him … at the other end of the spectrum is a YouTube video, a parish apart, describing a priest who seems to run an alternative liturgy. Where is our leadership? Good on you for your blog.


Thursday 18 July 2019

OF MANTRAS, MARY, MASS - AND MELBOURNE

To comment please open your gmail account, email me, use Facebook, Twitter or Messenger.
Scroll down for other comments.



"Ah, Julia, technology foils us again !"



Leo Leitch is nothing if not determined. It seems I overlooked or accidentally binned the following missive received from him God knows how long ago.

"As for “constant prayer” ", Leo continues, "you and I have been writing of petitioning prayer... What strikes me as perhaps a little irrational is (1) the idea that we should need to ask God to do or provide that which “accords with His will”.  

J: Do you mean, Leo, that God should automatically and always implement His will?
In that scenario, where is our human will? Should we not then be reduced to the status of puppets? 

What opportunity would we have for overcoming our innate weakness and doing good, and so coming closer to Christ? His will is that we become holy, and we can't become holy if we expect Him to do all the hard yards. 

God didn't create us to be automatons. He  created us human but with the potential to become divine. He gives us the immense privilege of becoming his children and as a Father he expects and wills our collaboration in establishing his kingdom. God has organized things so that some of the graces we need for our salvation depend on our prayer. 



L: Perhaps you are thinking in the sense that we pray in the Pater Noster that “Thy will be done on Earth”.  If so, His will is not being done on Earth, certainly not manifestly. 

J: It's not really my business that God's will isn't manifestly being done on earth. My business is to do God's will myself.

L: If you shall ask Me anything in My name, that I will do” – not apparent.

J: Unfortunately for 'extremely opinionated' people like myself, the first condition of the granting of prayer made in Jesus' name is humility. We are "unprofitable servants" and the only good we can achieve, for all our striving and self-congratulation, has been achieved already by Jesus crucified. He's beaten us to it.

The second condition for having prayer granted is complete confidence in Jesus' achievement on the Cross, through which we can be granted all good.  

L: And (2) the notion that we need to be petitioning God constantly to get anything done.  

J: Hardly. It's just that the more we pray to God, the more we love him, and the more effective our prayer will be.

L: Is He hard of hearing ? 

J: No.   

L: Or is He just getting old and slow ? 

J: No.   

L: Or is He just being difficult ? 

J: No. It's we who are difficult. 

L: As I’ve written before, any loving human father would quickly respond to a (i.e., one) reasonable request from his child.    If his child asked for a loaf of bread, he would not give her a stone.

J: And as I've written before (see above) God wills our collaboration in our sanctification. Otherwise we couldn't be sanctified. 

The unpalatable truth is that suffering is necessary for our salvation. St Therese of the Child Jesus said, "We are here to suffer". Our model is Christ despised and rejected, Christ crucified, Christ abused in the Eucharist and abandoned in the tabernacle. To enter heaven we must be conformed to Christ. So why should we expect a perpetual picnic?

L: God set Adam and Eve down to enjoy Paradise (the Garden of Eden) forever.    There was no indication at that point that their lives were to be spent constantly praying.

J: God set them down to enjoy Paradise in the Divine Will. At that point they were indeed praying without ceasing, because they were filled with God. But they chucked the Divine Will and opted for their own miserable human will instead. 

To regain the Divine Will we should be 'constantly praying'. Not down-on-our-knees praying, but doing-everything-for-God's-glory praying.

 L: He made us to know Him, to love Him, to serve Him here on Earth, and to be happy with Him forever in Heaven.    Likewise, we have children.    And we don’t expect our children to be constantly praising us nor constantly having to beg us for their needs.

J: I should think not. Because unlike God we are not perfect and so not deserving of praise. And God doesn't want us begging for our needs. He wants us loving him, which means loving others, and so begging for their needs rather than our own.

L: For myself, I interpret God’s plan as not having changed. 

J: Of course not. God doesn't change and neither does his plan.   

L: He wants us to enjoy our lives, while never forgetting that we owe it to Him. 

J: And we enjoy our lives to the extent that we love him. And never forget that we are fixed for all eternity in the degree of love we have for God when we die. That is the degree of God we will enjoy for all eternity. If we have loved God little, our eternal joy will be little. If we have loved Him greatly, our happiness will be accordingly great.

L: Thus we serve Him, by honouring Him at all times (that’s not what most might call praying, certainly it’s not petitioning), and by striving to do and proclaim His will.

J: No, honouring Him at all times is not what most might call praying, but it's what He told us to do: "Pray always".

L: It can be easy sometimes to think that He’s not pulling His weight.

J: Because we're not pulling ours.

L: And, as for praying, I’m not at all inclined to follow Church recommendations as to, say, the Rosary.    By which I mean meditating on sundry “Mysteries” while reciting, almost unconsciously, the words.

J: Horses for courses. 

L: I get a wee bit annoyed at Mass when the Confiteor is recited, and my fellow congregants speak to me without making the least effort to look at me.  

J: I  see the Confiteor as proclaiming my Catholic faith to God and affirming my faith to the people around me.   

L: Well, I know that they are, in fact, not speaking to me at all.     They are simply reciting words while thinking of something else entirely – what they have to buy at the supermarket on the way home, etc.    The words of the Confiteor, “and you, my brothers and sisters”, might as well be “fly me to the moon”.

J: Now, now, Leo. You're not judging, are you? Or are you a mind-reader? 

L: Shakespeare had one of his characters lament “My words fly up, my thoughts remain below.   Words without thoughts never to Heaven go.”   On the button.

J: Words recited as a mantra in contemplation certainly do to Heaven go. Shakespeare may have been a genius but he wasn't a contemplative.

L: The celebrated convert, Scott Hahn, was asked how he dealt with the Rosary, relative to its quite unProtestant repetitive litany.     His response was along the lines that no woman ever got tired of being praised.

J: Scott Hahn sounds rather flippant to me. Not to say irreverent. 

L: But how flattering is it to a woman or anyone to have someone saying flattering things about her, to her, while the flatterer’s mind is manifestly on something else ?

J: Flattery is never flattering. The Blessed Virgin Mary is perfect. She has no need of flattery and in the Rosary she doesn't get it anyway.

L: Do you know anyone who recites the Rosary while carefully trying to think of what s/he is saying ?  

J: Yes I do. And I'm not counting the saints. Or myself.

L: Well, you do know me, in this cyberspace way.    But, because of my insistence on this, I change the words of the Hail Mary anyway.

Like the Pater Noster, the Hail Mary starts with praise/flattery so as, it seems, to butter up Our Lady and make her feel well-disposed towards the pray-er, then it follows up with asking her for a favour (and not even a “please”). 

J: To me, the first part of the Hail Mary is a statement of fact.  And a small child has no need of saying 'please' to their mother to get her to hear. 

L: The sort of pitch that an insurance salesman might use.    Surely, Our Lady is not fooled these days !

J: She never was. Being conceived without original sin, the BVM possesses divine intelligence. 

L: So, I’m quite against anything that distracts one from the words of any prayer.  

J: As I noted above, horses for courses. We pray as we can. (I forget who said that first. Certainly not I.) 

L: Perhaps Claudius’s lament explains why we see around us very little evidence that prayers are being answered.

J: I hope I might have done a little better than Claudius.

Enough !    Perhaps you will, unlike our bishops, respond to this missive.

As you see, Leo, I have. At last.

And as it's past eleven p m and I still have to wash my hair (aaaRGH!) and as at 8.30 in the morning we leave for Melbourne and I haven't finished packing the bag, and as 'im indoors is coming out and going with me to Melbourne, this is the last missive I'll respond to, and the last post and gratuitous insults I will make, for 10 days.

The beautiful reason for Melbourne, apart from being with our son, is to be with a dear Kiwi friend making her First Profession in the Order of Our Lady of Mt Carmel, on Sunday.

Please pray for Michele.






AN ANONYMOUS TAKES UMBRAGE

To comment please open your gmail account, email me, use Facebook Messenger or Twitter.
Please scroll down for comments.

"A quick whiparound reveals," says 'Anonymous', "that  I am only low to moderately opinionated!"

'Anonymous' had taken umbrage at my remark in A METHODIST SERMON AT ST PATRICK'S NAPIER, about 'Anonymous' getting about a bit and being extremely opinionated. Well yes, knowing this 'Anonymous' I have to say that compared with moi, 'Anonymous' is shy and retiring.

Before any other potential 'Anonymouses' shy off, let me explain that I was using 'Anonymous' as a group term: putting all my 'Anonymouses' together, one could surely say that as they come from all over they do put themselves about a bit, and putting all their opinions together they could fairly be described as extremely opinionated. 

Just a joke. My fault for not inserting a smiley face, but I refuse to lower myself thusly.


Wednesday 17 July 2019

IF YOUR PRIEST OR BISHOP SOUNDS LIKE A FREEMASON ...

To comment, please use open your gmail account, use my email address, Facebook Twitter or Messenger. Scroll down for comments.

 
"Around 1978 the Italian police  raided a Masonic Lodge in Rome and got a list of Masons in the Catholic Church at the Vatican ..

In response to Monday's post, A METHODIST SERMON AT ST PATRICK'S NAPIER, Tony Keenan has  reminded me of 'Pecorelli's List' of supposed Freemasons highly placed in the Catholic Church. 

Tony might be chiding me, I think, for saying I was 'in doubt' that the architect of Vatican II, Monsignor Annibale Bugnini, was a Freemason. 

It's not so much that I doubt it,  it's just that Freemasonry - up until Paul VI's papacy the avowed and oft-declared (by several popes) enemy of the Catholic Church - is so famously secretive, it's almost impossible to prove that Bugnini or anyone else is/was a Freemason.

Tony goes on:

"A journalist named Pecorelli got hold of the list and published it, and was riddled by machine gun fire in 1979. I have read, but I cannot verify, that all the police involved in the raid met untimely deaths. The list is known as "the Pecorelli List" and is on the internet. 

Cardinals were apparently named on a list which was left beside  the bed of Pope John Paul I, ready for him to act on it the following day, but he was murdered that night. 

Bugnini's name is on that list. He "wrote" the Novus Ordo Mass in collusion with Protestants and a Jew, as I have read. 

Cardinal (actually Monsignor) Pinto, one of the current  Pope's right hand men, is on that list and  has expressed vehement opposition to the "Dubia" (the five 'doubts' submitted by four cardinals to Pope Francis following the publication of Amoris Laetitia).

There are 120 names on the list, the date they were inducted as Freemasons, their code name and the position they hold in the Catholic Church. If you are not aware of the list, you will be quite shocked. If you have seen it you will not be surprised at the state of the Church, and it will get rapidly get worse until we arrive at the 'Abomination of Desolation'. 



Julia, are you aware of the Alto Vendita, the Masonic blueprint for the destruction of the Catholic Faith. They have certainly succeeded."


Yes Tony, thank you, I am aware of the Alto Vendita. But strange to say, not a lot of the faithful are, so for the benefit of the majority, it's a document written in the early 19th century which mapped out the subversion of the Catholic Church, and I quote:

"Our ultimate end is that of Voltaire and of the French Revolution - the final destruction of Catholicism, and even of the Christian idea." 

The Alto Vendita was regarded at the time as the powerhouse of Freemasonry in Europe, and their goal was modified from the destruction of the Church (because they knew that was impossible) to infiltrating it in order to obliterate its influence in society and use it by "renewal", "progress" and "enlightenment" to further Masonic ends.

Which were the election of a liberal Pope and hierarchy, an upheaval and updating; a new theology contradicting doctrine and dogma; equality of religions, the secular state and pluralism. 

Two Popes - Pius IX, who guaranteed its authenticity and Leo XIII - asked that the Alta Vendita be published. Way back in 1884 Leo XIII wanted the hierarchy to "tear off the mask from Freemasonry and make plain to all what it really is." So does it strike you as strange that Catholics now have never heard of it?

We've all heard of the Freemasons; they're in every town, advertised by their cute little insignia, usually alongside Rotary (with which its said, the Masons are tied up), but gosh, Masons are nice people who go around doing nice things in "the community". Mention Alta Vendita or Masonic designs on the Church to certain parties and it brings them out in boils; a reminder to Father that one of his  flock is a self-confessed Mason and so automatically excommunicated, is dismissed with a "there, there, diddums" sort of response.

However, Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan is on to it. He warns that Freemasonry is an "instrument of Satan seeking to destroy the Church". He says the goal of Freemasonry is to eliminate the entire doctrine of God, especially Catholic doctrine, the corruption of morality because they can't defeat the Church by logical arguments. 

'"The nature of Freemasonry is anti-Christian. They deny Christ. Freemasonry is another, anti-Christ religion. It is a mortal sin to become a Freemason - even Pope Francis has not changed this law. 

"It is difficult to demonstrate concretely, to identify, who is a member. It is very difficult and dangerous. The secrecy and esotericism of Freemasonry makes it very difficult.

"One can assume that a cleric, a priest, bishop, or cardinal, has some connections with the Masons by his speech. We hear clerics speaking like Freemasons, clearly, when they open their mouths they use terms and concepts that are typically masonic. Maybe he is not a formal member, but some bishops and cardinals speak clearly with a Masonic spirit."

Nearly 60 years ago St Padre Pio entreated one Fr Luigi Villa to devote his life to fighting Ecclesiastical Masonry. The saint met with Fr Villa three times, saying at the close of the second meeting, "Be brave now … for the Church has already been invaded by Freemasonry! Freemasonry has made it into the loafers (shoes) of the Pope!" That Pope was Paul VI.

By the bye, it's said that Fr Villa - who was given a Papal Mandate for his work by Pius XII - survived seven assassination attempts. And the newly-elected Pope John Paul I passed away in unknown circumstances before he had time to do anything about Pecorelli's List. Carmine Pecorelli, an investigative journalist and member of the elite P2 Lodge, was murdered.

Some of the bigwigs in the Church he named as Freemasons were Jean Cardinal Villo, Agostino Cardinal Casaroli, Ugi Cardinal Poletti, Sebastiano Cardinal Baggio, Joseph Cardinal Suenens, and Archbishop Paul Casimir Marcinkus. And Msgr Pinto.

Strange to say, Pecorelli's List passed without comment by the hierarchy. No one denied being on the list and no one was sacked for being on the list. Monsignor Bugnini was sent off to Iran as pro-Nuncio, but only after presentation to Paul VI of evidence that he was a Mason.

So I was wrong to have "doubt" about Bugnini.

I mentioned yesterday on the website 1 Peter 5 that at St Patrick's, the main city church in Napier, a Methodist minister had given the sermon at Sunday Mass while the PP was doing the same at the Anglican cathedral. Voila!" It's the "equality of religions" sought by the Freemasons 200 years ago. Hey people, here in the Church of Nice in New Zealand, Freemasonry has succeeded!

A chap responded to my comment from England, saying he lived in Wellington for a year. "It's a wasteland," he said. 

Has the Church in New Zealand been laid waste by Ecclesiastical Freemasonry? Are there priests and even bishops here who while not perhaps being formally members of a Lodge, sound like Freemasons? Like for example Pope Francis, who bandies Masonic terms about: "a family of broad horizons and fraternal loyalty … that Greater Fatherland …"

When Jorge Bergoglio was elected Pope the Freemasons were happy as sandboys: "The Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy expressed his joy regarding the election of Pope Francis: "With the election of Pope Francis nothing will ever be the same again. (emphasis in original). Can a Mason be a prophet? Sounds like it.

I'd say that given the impossibility of identifying Ecclesial Masons, we might well be guided by the duck test. If your priest or bishop sounds like a Mason and/or acts like a Mason, then he probably is a Mason.

Ergo, avoid him, his sermons, his newsletters, his retreats, and disavow his press statements. 

Pray for him. But never confess your sins to him. 

Monday 15 July 2019

A METHODIST SERMON AT ST PATRICK'S NAPIER


To comment please open your gmail account, email me or use Facebook, Twitter or Messenger. Scroll down for comments.


At the main Catholic church in the city of Napier yesterday, St Patrick's, the sermon was preached by a Methodist minister.

Yes, you read that correctly. Here's what 'Anonymous' (he/she obviously gets about a bit and is extremely opinionated) reports:

"You may be interested to know (well yes, I was) that we had a Methodist minister preach us the sermon yesterday at St. Patrick's. Apparently part of an ecumenical agreement made 30 years ago in Napier but only now reviving in "the sharing of pulpits" or some similar sounding thing.  

He talked long and boringly about nations and neighbourliness. Then he threw in that we can all share "in the breaking of bread and sharing of wine", with a nod towards the altar. 

The Mass was completely watered down (no organist, piss poor singing to piss poorly taped songs). 

In the newsletter Fr. Barry (Scannell, SM) was pleading  for us all to send our kids to Catholic schools. Why would we? They are pretty much the same as the others except they cost more! Just saying... 


P.S. Fr. Barry was preaching at another church. Anglican I think."


'Anonymous' was not highly edified. Highly mystified is what I'd like to say I am, but that would not be truthful.



Because this event seems the natural yet supernatural outcome of a couple of hundred years of Masonic infiltration of the Church and nearly one hundred years of Communist infiltration which had as its aim the downfall of the Mass. 


The spadework on top of those foundations was done by men like Mons Annibale Bugnini, the architect of the Novus Ordo (New Mass). Archbishop Lefebvre heard him say, when asked by the Benedictines' Superior General if Bugnini's "active participation" meant his order must discontinue private Masses, " We didn't think of that". 

And to another Superior General who objected to Bugnini's 15-minute Mass as "not respectful", Bugnini riposted, "We can always add something".


Archbishop Lefebvre was speechless. Later he managed to articulate something of his astonishment: "How could it be possible for this man to be entrusted with the entire reform of the Catholic Liturgy, the entire reform of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, of the sacraments, of the Breviary, and of all our prayers? Where are we going? Where is the Church going?"

Well, where the Church in New Zealand has arrived is the pitiful, disgraceful sell-out to heresy in the name of 'ecumenism' that my correspondent witnessed at St Patrick's Napier yesterday: a Protestant minister in the pulpit at Sunday Mass reducing the unbloody re-enactment of the Sacrifice of the Son of God on Calvary to 'breaking bread and sharing wine'.  

We could say that poor Rev Tony Franklin-Ross was utterly and totally out of his depth, but what could we say of the bishop who permits such a betrayal of our Lord? 

We'll probably never know if Bugnini was a Mason. Indeed, in a newish book, Annibale Bugnini: Reformer of the Liturgy, by Yves Chiron, Cardinal Stickler is quoted as saying, when asked if Bugnini were a Freemason and if that was the reason Pope Paul VI dismissed him, "No, it was something far worse." The mind boggles.

But we do know - if 'Anonymous' is correct - that this farcical 'pulpit-sharing' in Napier has been going on for thirty years, and that the bishop of Palmerston North Diocese thirty years ago was none other than +Peter Cullinane. It started on his watch; it would appear that we have him to thank for this adventure in spurious ecumenism.

I'm heartily sick and tired of 'ecumenism', the post-Vat2  idol which is twin to 'community'. Terrible twins, I say. 

True ecumenism is not cosying-up to the Protestants, the Jews or the Muslims, sharing pulpits and Advent wreaths and the 'Cross Walk' on Good Friday. Instead of dutifully turning up to these sad exercises in self-delusion ,and shoulder-tapping unwilling parishioners to do the same, Father should be sympathetically but clearly preaching, in his own church, on the elements of truth in these other religions while clearly explaining and rejecting their errors. 

As Pope Pius XI has stated, in Mortalium Animos, "The unity of Christians cannot be otherwise obtained than by securing the return of the separstated to the one true Church of CHrist, from which they unhappiy withdrew. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, that stands forth before all and that, by the will of its Founder, will remain forever the same as when he established for the salvation of all mankind."

It's what the SSPX priest told me in confession a couple of months ago: "You must leave your ecumenical group and explain why you are leaving, and invite them to become Catholics". 

The Good Thing which I hope and pray will come to pass in Napier as a result of the good Methodist minister's sermon and 'the piss-poor singing to piss-poor taped songs' is the realization for St Patrick's congregation of the treasure offered them a few blocks away, 5 p m every third Sunday of the month (4.30 p m for confessions) at Dunstall's Funeral Chapel: the Traditional Latin Mass* complete with cracker sermons.

And this Sunday is the third Sunday! Unfortunately I'll be in Melbourne - where I can attend the Latin Mass at St Colman's in Balaclava.


*Just be aware of the dress code for women: skirts to below the knee and veils (mantillas) or hats.